i don't feel that i have anything to gain from defending those following the footsteps of the likes of Al Goldstein. defending people to the death, people who would see me and my kids addicted to their pornography, over some forgotten notion of free speech is what got us in this mess.
So cool seeing democrats defending their nigger-in-chief's Operation Chokepoint here. Firearms should also be banned by credit card companies according to you.
Firearms should also be banned by credit card companies according to you.
kind of a retarded jump to make. by this logic, you are in favor of letting jews do whatever they want so we can all be free. surely we can both avoid jumping to these dumb conclusions and realize that the payment processors accidentally eating their own pornographers, who ultimately make media that psychologically castrates people and lowers testosterone in young boys and men, is a mistake that benefits us.
as for the "but it's a power grab and gets us used to jewish corporations controlling what we buy" argument that inevitably fuels your side of the debate, i think it's completely invalidated by the fact that corporations and govts already do that. they can already close your bank account, even in America many types of guns are illegal, buying large amounts of fertilizer in the middle of an urban city is going to get you a knock at the door, etc... you already aren't free. porn ending up banned, if anything, is a step towards us being freer, not more restricted.
no, i am. and i say banning porn is good. if a jew, like one running a credit card company, does it, then i say he is retarded and didn't get the memo that porn keeps us docile, but i'm also happy it happened because i would have done the same were i in charge of the banks.
your way of thinking is basically letting anyone who knows how you work reverse psychology you into doing anything they want... tomorrow if jews want you to support the degenerate weed-and-prostitutes clubs in Amsterdam all they have to do is film a feminist sperging out about how it's a sign of the patriarchy and get you triggered and basically arguing against yourself just because a "feminist" angered you, am i wrong? what other complete degeneracies and pits of depravity oould i get you to agree with just because you've decided you're all butthurt about my posts online?
payment processors accidentally eating their own pornographers
But they're not. They're eating a handful of individual artists while happily processing payments for Only Fans. They're not "banning phonography," they're removing competition.
Squashing fictional, 2D, relatively socially-harmless pornography so they can keep the degeneracy focused on convincing your little sister that she can get rich being fucked online.
You want to make drug analogies? This is a multinational fent cartel cracking down on a guy growing weed in a flowerpot. And you're going, "based, drugs are bad." Sure, maybe they are. But you would have to be an absolute retard to think this was actually being done to decrease the quantity or negative impact of porn. Or that it would result in one.
i don't see porn as something anyone should compete in, same as who can produce the best recreational narcotic. forget about me specifically for a moment and think about any random person who is categorically against both porn and hard drugs - given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity? his hope would be that OnlyFans and the fent cartel both burn down next, although i get what you mean and it's obviously unlikely they won't.
still, the existence of fent doesn't make weed better and the existence of interracial gangbangs doesn't make japanese hentai better. any comparisons like that lead to that old libertarian argument of defending gays on weed farms who can own cannons, at which point you stand for nothing and will defend anybody as long as he can fit into a "first they came for the jews" saying.
I do not recommend that anyone playor watch anything that leads to cooming due to health risks. However Japanese coomer stuff is made by independent creators, not jews.
If anything it is the canary in the coal mine on the tools that will be used to control markets in the very near future.
i don't feel that i have anything to gain from defending those following the footsteps of the likes of Al Goldstein. defending people to the death, people who would see me and my kids addicted to their pornography, over some forgotten notion of free speech is what got us in this mess.
So cool seeing democrats defending their nigger-in-chief's Operation Chokepoint here. Firearms should also be banned by credit card companies according to you.
kind of a retarded jump to make. by this logic, you are in favor of letting jews do whatever they want so we can all be free. surely we can both avoid jumping to these dumb conclusions and realize that the payment processors accidentally eating their own pornographers, who ultimately make media that psychologically castrates people and lowers testosterone in young boys and men, is a mistake that benefits us.
as for the "but it's a power grab and gets us used to jewish corporations controlling what we buy" argument that inevitably fuels your side of the debate, i think it's completely invalidated by the fact that corporations and govts already do that. they can already close your bank account, even in America many types of guns are illegal, buying large amounts of fertilizer in the middle of an urban city is going to get you a knock at the door, etc... you already aren't free. porn ending up banned, if anything, is a step towards us being freer, not more restricted.
. you are in favor of letting jews do whatever they want so we can all be free
Says the guy arguing that (((credit card))) companies are the correct arbiter of morality.
no, i am. and i say banning porn is good. if a jew, like one running a credit card company, does it, then i say he is retarded and didn't get the memo that porn keeps us docile, but i'm also happy it happened because i would have done the same were i in charge of the banks.
your way of thinking is basically letting anyone who knows how you work reverse psychology you into doing anything they want... tomorrow if jews want you to support the degenerate weed-and-prostitutes clubs in Amsterdam all they have to do is film a feminist sperging out about how it's a sign of the patriarchy and get you triggered and basically arguing against yourself just because a "feminist" angered you, am i wrong? what other complete degeneracies and pits of depravity oould i get you to agree with just because you've decided you're all butthurt about my posts online?
But they're not. They're eating a handful of individual artists while happily processing payments for Only Fans. They're not "banning phonography," they're removing competition.
Squashing fictional, 2D, relatively socially-harmless pornography so they can keep the degeneracy focused on convincing your little sister that she can get rich being fucked online.
You want to make drug analogies? This is a multinational fent cartel cracking down on a guy growing weed in a flowerpot. And you're going, "based, drugs are bad." Sure, maybe they are. But you would have to be an absolute retard to think this was actually being done to decrease the quantity or negative impact of porn. Or that it would result in one.
i don't see porn as something anyone should compete in, same as who can produce the best recreational narcotic. forget about me specifically for a moment and think about any random person who is categorically against both porn and hard drugs - given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity? his hope would be that OnlyFans and the fent cartel both burn down next, although i get what you mean and it's obviously unlikely they won't.
still, the existence of fent doesn't make weed better and the existence of interracial gangbangs doesn't make japanese hentai better. any comparisons like that lead to that old libertarian argument of defending gays on weed farms who can own cannons, at which point you stand for nothing and will defend anybody as long as he can fit into a "first they came for the jews" saying.
I do not recommend that anyone playor watch anything that leads to cooming due to health risks. However Japanese coomer stuff is made by independent creators, not jews.
If anything it is the canary in the coal mine on the tools that will be used to control markets in the very near future.