payment processors accidentally eating their own pornographers
But they're not. They're eating a handful of individual artists while happily processing payments for Only Fans. They're not "banning phonography," they're removing competition.
Squashing fictional, 2D, relatively socially-harmless pornography so they can keep the degeneracy focused on convincing your little sister that she can get rich being fucked online.
You want to make drug analogies? This is a multinational fent cartel cracking down on a guy growing weed in a flowerpot. And you're going, "based, drugs are bad." Sure, maybe they are. But you would have to be an absolute retard to think this was actually being done to decrease the quantity or negative impact of porn. Or that it would result in one.
i don't see porn as something anyone should compete in, same as who can produce the best recreational narcotic. forget about me specifically for a moment and think about any random person who is categorically against both porn and hard drugs - given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity? his hope would be that OnlyFans and the fent cartel both burn down next, although i get what you mean and it's obviously unlikely they won't.
still, the existence of fent doesn't make weed better and the existence of interracial gangbangs doesn't make japanese hentai better. any comparisons like that lead to that old libertarian argument of defending gays on weed farms who can own cannons, at which point you stand for nothing and will defend anybody as long as he can fit into a "first they came for the jews" saying.
given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity
I think you're misunderstanding our issue with your comments. It's not about defending porn. It's that it comes off as excusing the behavior of the payment processors because this time you approve of their target. Visa and Mastercard are not the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable to purchase.
If you think there should be a porn ban or whatever, that's fine. Just don't give a free pass to the hijacking of the economy and social standards by a small handful of bankers.
We're not suggesting you defend the guy growing weed at home. We're saying you should always condemn the cartels.
But they're not. They're eating a handful of individual artists while happily processing payments for Only Fans. They're not "banning phonography," they're removing competition.
Squashing fictional, 2D, relatively socially-harmless pornography so they can keep the degeneracy focused on convincing your little sister that she can get rich being fucked online.
You want to make drug analogies? This is a multinational fent cartel cracking down on a guy growing weed in a flowerpot. And you're going, "based, drugs are bad." Sure, maybe they are. But you would have to be an absolute retard to think this was actually being done to decrease the quantity or negative impact of porn. Or that it would result in one.
i don't see porn as something anyone should compete in, same as who can produce the best recreational narcotic. forget about me specifically for a moment and think about any random person who is categorically against both porn and hard drugs - given these news, why would he defend porn and weed, at all, in any capacity? his hope would be that OnlyFans and the fent cartel both burn down next, although i get what you mean and it's obviously unlikely they won't.
still, the existence of fent doesn't make weed better and the existence of interracial gangbangs doesn't make japanese hentai better. any comparisons like that lead to that old libertarian argument of defending gays on weed farms who can own cannons, at which point you stand for nothing and will defend anybody as long as he can fit into a "first they came for the jews" saying.
I think you're misunderstanding our issue with your comments. It's not about defending porn. It's that it comes off as excusing the behavior of the payment processors because this time you approve of their target. Visa and Mastercard are not the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable to purchase.
If you think there should be a porn ban or whatever, that's fine. Just don't give a free pass to the hijacking of the economy and social standards by a small handful of bankers.
We're not suggesting you defend the guy growing weed at home. We're saying you should always condemn the cartels.