No thanks, but I read enough of the politicrap shitfest to know it's just their usual shenanigans, They say a ruling isn't significant because of the law, while ignoring that rulings are far more important, as they are the actual intersection of law where it hits real life. PF always pulls this crap, always in the same direction. They're always shit.
No, it's not. Right now right here what's being discussed is the value of posting politififact links as argument. You don't get to tell me or anyone what's "all that's being discussed." Holy shit, the entitlement.
edit: also, read these fucking things. Even according to politicrap, the 2018 ruling is real. What they balance against it is "sparked backlash" and "In 2019, after thousands signed a petition calling for sexual offense legislation to be revamped, Finland announced it was strengthening its laws"
but
No actual change in law or contrary rulings. There may be, but those aren't featured here.
WHICH IS WHY POLITFACT IS CRAP. They say true things are false with silly arcane linguistic torture. They also frequently say false things are true, and both ways they go only ever serve the Blue Longhouse. PF is some hardcore boomer facebook-level bluesky-fodder reddit-"well ackshually" bullshit, and you should know this.
Not knowing this is a problem. Wanna try Snopes nexr? Where you from, boy?
Anyone have a link to the article on the right? Tried looking it up and came up empty
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts. Finland has not ruled that sex with a minor is permitted lol.
Also don't try to pull rank on me, young fuck-stick. I've almost certainly been enmeshed in this mess a lot longer than you. This account is young because all mods suck dick.
Also also, mark your fuckin edits. Observe:
edit: Don't cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was there when Chris Raygun was still a good guy. Hell, I was there when David Pakman was still acting like a person.
It's not quite real. It's at best an exaggeration of a case where a man was convicted of sexual assault against a minor for 3 years instead of rape for 10 years because there was no evidence of violence or an attempt to intimidate the child. However unreasonable you may think that outcome is (I certainly find it questionable and would want a far harsher punishment), it doesn't mean sex with children is permitted in Finland based on culture.
But, I think you could very legitimately argue that the "no violence / intimidation" element is difficult to square with a child's understanding and potential consent in the first place. IMO, this somewhat weak conviction is based on an unwarranted technicality and seems like a potential relaxation of how their justice system handles statutory rape.
If you interfere with the development of a child you should be executed. I don't care if you used violence, candy, or just pure sociopathy, but you're a dead man walking.
Good Lord, that headline has some of the worst resting bitch faces I’ve ever seen.
The women down here in New Zealand are equally high on their own fart supply. The entitlement and arrogance I see every day is off the charts, downright disgusting. 5 minutes in conversation with some of them and it’s immediately obvious that they can never be fixed.
I have a son who’s only 4, and I genuinely worry for his future every day of my life.
Too many women subverting the country:
https://x.com/KenraalitSuomi/status/2036791031904035086
What's the WEF status of the non blonde non blurred femoid. Nevermind. Already know.
a cabal of baby-eating witches preach for feminism while muslims rape children freely
I was here at the moment Chukna finally admitted Finland is a country.
Anyone have a link to the article on the right? Tried looking it up and came up empty u/chukna
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/apr/26/instagram-posts/viral-claim-distorts-finnish-law-child-sex-abuse/
Hate agreeing with you, because you're a liberal faggot. But when you're right you're right. Still downvoted you.
Downvotes don't do anything currently.
They really don't do anything when working properly as well
People are posting Politicrap "fact-checks" here unironically? Wtf is going on with the standards here of late.
Find the article, if it's real. Your account is 4 months old the only thing you know is of late.
No thanks, but I read enough of the politicrap shitfest to know it's just their usual shenanigans, They say a ruling isn't significant because of the law, while ignoring that rulings are far more important, as they are the actual intersection of law where it hits real life. PF always pulls this crap, always in the same direction. They're always shit.
The ruling in the article from OP’s image is fake. That’s all that’s being discussed
No, it's not. Right now right here what's being discussed is the value of posting politififact links as argument. You don't get to tell me or anyone what's "all that's being discussed." Holy shit, the entitlement.
edit: also, read these fucking things. Even according to politicrap, the 2018 ruling is real. What they balance against it is "sparked backlash" and "In 2019, after thousands signed a petition calling for sexual offense legislation to be revamped, Finland announced it was strengthening its laws"
but
No actual change in law or contrary rulings. There may be, but those aren't featured here.
WHICH IS WHY POLITFACT IS CRAP. They say true things are false with silly arcane linguistic torture. They also frequently say false things are true, and both ways they go only ever serve the Blue Longhouse. PF is some hardcore boomer facebook-level bluesky-fodder reddit-"well ackshually" bullshit, and you should know this.
Not knowing this is a problem. Wanna try Snopes nexr? Where you from, boy?
Yes, it is lol. I started the thread.
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts. Finland has not ruled that sex with a minor is permitted lol.
I'm from the US. How about you?
Also don't try to pull rank on me, young fuck-stick. I've almost certainly been enmeshed in this mess a lot longer than you. This account is young because all mods suck dick.
Also also, mark your fuckin edits. Observe:
edit: Don't cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was there when Chris Raygun was still a good guy. Hell, I was there when David Pakman was still acting like a person.
I'm probably older than you, you weirdo. And I'm sure no one is more rank than you, stinky 😉
It has nothing to do with age, you just tried to pull some kind of rank on me, and I rebuffed it.
You need to read slower or grow brighter.
lol "you're right and I'm mad about it"
Thanks for the laugh man
I don't care you are right, I hate you. You are a piece of shit so you get downvoted.
I'm just admitting you are right, you dummy
Okay, sounds great! Still got a good chuckle.
Let go of your anger man. It's holding you down.
Ride a cactus cock a develope sepsis you ignorant commie fuck. Nothing was funny, you're laughing because you're a retard
Aw, cute!
I love your rage. It's just delicious.
It's not quite real. It's at best an exaggeration of a case where a man was convicted of sexual assault against a minor for 3 years instead of rape for 10 years because there was no evidence of violence or an attempt to intimidate the child. However unreasonable you may think that outcome is (I certainly find it questionable and would want a far harsher punishment), it doesn't mean sex with children is permitted in Finland based on culture.
But, I think you could very legitimately argue that the "no violence / intimidation" element is difficult to square with a child's understanding and potential consent in the first place. IMO, this somewhat weak conviction is based on an unwarranted technicality and seems like a potential relaxation of how their justice system handles statutory rape.
If you interfere with the development of a child you should be executed. I don't care if you used violence, candy, or just pure sociopathy, but you're a dead man walking.
Cool. I think it would be more effective to share actual articles instead of fake/sensationalism
You get the leaders you deserve. Women are incapable of taking power by force.
That’s also not exactly a recent article. They booted that bitch out in 2023 and are still feeling the pain. That bitch nearly destroyed them
So, is the culture in question often called Mohammed? Or is it Patel? Ah who are we kidding it’s both.
Good Lord, that headline has some of the worst resting bitch faces I’ve ever seen.
The women down here in New Zealand are equally high on their own fart supply. The entitlement and arrogance I see every day is off the charts, downright disgusting. 5 minutes in conversation with some of them and it’s immediately obvious that they can never be fixed.
I have a son who’s only 4, and I genuinely worry for his future every day of my life.
Yeeessa... obey your new masters...