No thanks, but I read enough of the politicrap shitfest to know it's just their usual shenanigans, They say a ruling isn't significant because of the law, while ignoring that rulings are far more important, as they are the actual intersection of law where it hits real life. PF always pulls this crap, always in the same direction. They're always shit.
No, it's not. Right now right here what's being discussed is the value of posting politififact links as argument. You don't get to tell me or anyone what's "all that's being discussed." Holy shit, the entitlement.
edit: also, read these fucking things. Even according to politicrap, the 2018 ruling is real. What they balance against it is "sparked backlash" and "In 2019, after thousands signed a petition calling for sexual offense legislation to be revamped, Finland announced it was strengthening its laws"
but
No actual change in law or contrary rulings. There may be, but those aren't featured here.
WHICH IS WHY POLITFACT IS CRAP. They say true things are false with silly arcane linguistic torture. They also frequently say false things are true, and both ways they go only ever serve the Blue Longhouse. PF is some hardcore boomer facebook-level bluesky-fodder reddit-"well ackshually" bullshit, and you should know this.
Not knowing this is a problem. Wanna try Snopes nexr? Where you from, boy?
Anyone have a link to the article on the right? Tried looking it up and came up empty
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts. Finland has not ruled that sex with a minor is permitted lol.
LOL as if "starting the thread" gave you some kind of authority as to what people are allowed to talk about. Like I said, holy shit levels of delusional entitlement.
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts.
And you've still not demonstrated that even a little bit, because that position relies entirely on a completely terrible source, that doesn't even agree with its own thrust.
Which is what all this is about.
You should have reasons for thinking things, and for saying them. If you want to "confirm (or disconfirm) its veracity," you're still going to have to go ahead and do that, because you sure as fuck haven't taken even baby-steps toward that as it is.
Is the original thesis sensationalized? Probably. Is it untrue? Well, so far, from what's been presented, no. De facto, due to rulings (which is real, as even PF admits) the post's thesis appears to be correct. Right now it's the ruling on one hand, versus some kind of "feeling" and a handful of signatures that Finland probably won't generally go in the direction of said ruling.
Which we don't know, because we don't have that information. But we don't have anything tangible that says otherwise, either. All we have is politifact being awful and untrustworthy, as usual.
Also don't try to pull rank on me, young fuck-stick. I've almost certainly been enmeshed in this mess a lot longer than you. This account is young because all mods suck dick.
Also also, mark your fuckin edits. Observe:
edit: Don't cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was there when Chris Raygun was still a good guy. Hell, I was there when David Pakman was still acting like a person.
No thanks, but I read enough of the politicrap shitfest to know it's just their usual shenanigans, They say a ruling isn't significant because of the law, while ignoring that rulings are far more important, as they are the actual intersection of law where it hits real life. PF always pulls this crap, always in the same direction. They're always shit.
The ruling in the article from OP’s image is fake. That’s all that’s being discussed
No, it's not. Right now right here what's being discussed is the value of posting politififact links as argument. You don't get to tell me or anyone what's "all that's being discussed." Holy shit, the entitlement.
edit: also, read these fucking things. Even according to politicrap, the 2018 ruling is real. What they balance against it is "sparked backlash" and "In 2019, after thousands signed a petition calling for sexual offense legislation to be revamped, Finland announced it was strengthening its laws"
but
No actual change in law or contrary rulings. There may be, but those aren't featured here.
WHICH IS WHY POLITFACT IS CRAP. They say true things are false with silly arcane linguistic torture. They also frequently say false things are true, and both ways they go only ever serve the Blue Longhouse. PF is some hardcore boomer facebook-level bluesky-fodder reddit-"well ackshually" bullshit, and you should know this.
Not knowing this is a problem. Wanna try Snopes nexr? Where you from, boy?
Yes, it is lol. I started the thread.
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts. Finland has not ruled that sex with a minor is permitted lol.
I'm from the US. How about you?
LOL as if "starting the thread" gave you some kind of authority as to what people are allowed to talk about. Like I said, holy shit levels of delusional entitlement.
And you've still not demonstrated that even a little bit, because that position relies entirely on a completely terrible source, that doesn't even agree with its own thrust.
Which is what all this is about.
You should have reasons for thinking things, and for saying them. If you want to "confirm (or disconfirm) its veracity," you're still going to have to go ahead and do that, because you sure as fuck haven't taken even baby-steps toward that as it is.
Is the original thesis sensationalized? Probably. Is it untrue? Well, so far, from what's been presented, no. De facto, due to rulings (which is real, as even PF admits) the post's thesis appears to be correct. Right now it's the ruling on one hand, versus some kind of "feeling" and a handful of signatures that Finland probably won't generally go in the direction of said ruling.
Which we don't know, because we don't have that information. But we don't have anything tangible that says otherwise, either. All we have is politifact being awful and untrustworthy, as usual.
Also don't try to pull rank on me, young fuck-stick. I've almost certainly been enmeshed in this mess a lot longer than you. This account is young because all mods suck dick.
Also also, mark your fuckin edits. Observe:
edit: Don't cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was there when Chris Raygun was still a good guy. Hell, I was there when David Pakman was still acting like a person.
I'm probably older than you, you weirdo. And I'm sure no one is more rank than you, stinky 😉
It has nothing to do with age, you just tried to pull some kind of rank on me, and I rebuffed it.
You need to read slower or grow brighter.
No one tried "pulling rank" on you, you're just being over sensitive and looking for an argument.
Edit - I erased name calling because I'm looking to end interaction with you. Since you want edits