Anyone have a link to the article on the right? Tried looking it up and came up empty
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts. Finland has not ruled that sex with a minor is permitted lol.
LOL as if "starting the thread" gave you some kind of authority as to what people are allowed to talk about. Like I said, holy shit levels of delusional entitlement.
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts.
And you've still not demonstrated that even a little bit, because that position relies entirely on a completely terrible source, that doesn't even agree with its own thrust.
Which is what all this is about.
You should have reasons for thinking things, and for saying them. If you want to "confirm (or disconfirm) its veracity," you're still going to have to go ahead and do that, because you sure as fuck haven't taken even baby-steps toward that as it is.
Is the original thesis sensationalized? Probably. Is it untrue? Well, so far, from what's been presented, no. De facto, due to rulings (which is real, as even PF admits) the post's thesis appears to be correct. Right now it's the ruling on one hand, versus some kind of "feeling" and a handful of signatures that Finland probably won't generally go in the direction of said ruling.
Which we don't know, because we don't have that information. But we don't have anything tangible that says otherwise, either. All we have is politifact being awful and untrustworthy, as usual.
It gives me the knowledge on what the topic at hand is. Nobody is saying anything about what is "allowed to talk about." Are you mixing up threads or something?
And you've still not demonstrated that even a little bit
Okay, then do you have a link to the article?
My reason for asking is because I see it in OP's image but I'm doubting even the existence of it. If you are able to provide a link to a place I can read about it that'd be great! As I said earlier, regular searching isn't providing much in terms of results.
Yes, it is lol. I started the thread.
I wanted to confirm its veracity and to read more on it, but the article is, at best, a sensationalized review of the facts. Finland has not ruled that sex with a minor is permitted lol.
I'm from the US. How about you?
LOL as if "starting the thread" gave you some kind of authority as to what people are allowed to talk about. Like I said, holy shit levels of delusional entitlement.
And you've still not demonstrated that even a little bit, because that position relies entirely on a completely terrible source, that doesn't even agree with its own thrust.
Which is what all this is about.
You should have reasons for thinking things, and for saying them. If you want to "confirm (or disconfirm) its veracity," you're still going to have to go ahead and do that, because you sure as fuck haven't taken even baby-steps toward that as it is.
Is the original thesis sensationalized? Probably. Is it untrue? Well, so far, from what's been presented, no. De facto, due to rulings (which is real, as even PF admits) the post's thesis appears to be correct. Right now it's the ruling on one hand, versus some kind of "feeling" and a handful of signatures that Finland probably won't generally go in the direction of said ruling.
Which we don't know, because we don't have that information. But we don't have anything tangible that says otherwise, either. All we have is politifact being awful and untrustworthy, as usual.
It gives me the knowledge on what the topic at hand is. Nobody is saying anything about what is "allowed to talk about." Are you mixing up threads or something?
Okay, then do you have a link to the article?
My reason for asking is because I see it in OP's image but I'm doubting even the existence of it. If you are able to provide a link to a place I can read about it that'd be great! As I said earlier, regular searching isn't providing much in terms of results.
Also you never mentioned where you were from