No thanks, but I read enough of the politicrap shitfest to know it's just their usual shenanigans, They say a ruling isn't significant because of the law, while ignoring that rulings are far more important, as they are the actual intersection of law where it hits real life. PF always pulls this crap, always in the same direction. They're always shit.
No, it's not. Right now right here what's being discussed is the value of posting politififact links as argument. You don't get to tell me or anyone what's "all that's being discussed." Holy shit, the entitlement.
edit: also, read these fucking things. Even according to politicrap, the 2018 ruling is real. What they balance against it is "sparked backlash" and "In 2019, after thousands signed a petition calling for sexual offense legislation to be revamped, Finland announced it was strengthening its laws"
but
No actual change in law or contrary rulings. There may be, but those aren't featured here.
WHICH IS WHY POLITFACT IS CRAP. They say true things are false with silly arcane linguistic torture. They also frequently say false things are true, and both ways they go only ever serve the Blue Longhouse. PF is some hardcore boomer facebook-level bluesky-fodder reddit-"well ackshually" bullshit, and you should know this.
Not knowing this is a problem. Wanna try Snopes nexr? Where you from, boy?
Also don't try to pull rank on me, young fuck-stick. I've almost certainly been enmeshed in this mess a lot longer than you. This account is young because all mods suck dick.
Also also, mark your fuckin edits. Observe:
edit: Don't cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was there when Chris Raygun was still a good guy. Hell, I was there when David Pakman was still acting like a person.
People are posting Politicrap "fact-checks" here unironically? Wtf is going on with the standards here of late.
Find the article, if it's real. Your account is 4 months old the only thing you know is of late.
No thanks, but I read enough of the politicrap shitfest to know it's just their usual shenanigans, They say a ruling isn't significant because of the law, while ignoring that rulings are far more important, as they are the actual intersection of law where it hits real life. PF always pulls this crap, always in the same direction. They're always shit.
The ruling in the article from OP’s image is fake. That’s all that’s being discussed
No, it's not. Right now right here what's being discussed is the value of posting politififact links as argument. You don't get to tell me or anyone what's "all that's being discussed." Holy shit, the entitlement.
edit: also, read these fucking things. Even according to politicrap, the 2018 ruling is real. What they balance against it is "sparked backlash" and "In 2019, after thousands signed a petition calling for sexual offense legislation to be revamped, Finland announced it was strengthening its laws"
but
No actual change in law or contrary rulings. There may be, but those aren't featured here.
WHICH IS WHY POLITFACT IS CRAP. They say true things are false with silly arcane linguistic torture. They also frequently say false things are true, and both ways they go only ever serve the Blue Longhouse. PF is some hardcore boomer facebook-level bluesky-fodder reddit-"well ackshually" bullshit, and you should know this.
Not knowing this is a problem. Wanna try Snopes nexr? Where you from, boy?
Also don't try to pull rank on me, young fuck-stick. I've almost certainly been enmeshed in this mess a lot longer than you. This account is young because all mods suck dick.
Also also, mark your fuckin edits. Observe:
edit: Don't cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was there when Chris Raygun was still a good guy. Hell, I was there when David Pakman was still acting like a person.
I'm probably older than you, you weirdo. And I'm sure no one is more rank than you, stinky 😉