https://x.com/41NBC/status/2028881629758771481
A jury has found Colin Gray guilty on 27 felony counts tied to the September shooting at Apalachee High School carried out by his son that killed four people and injured nine others.
Georgia school shooting suspect’s father convicted of second-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter https://archive.is/whim5
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2028897549461917773
"This is a 12 year old boy. A black boy!! You gonna put him in jail?!?" Father of a 12-year-old r*pist
https://x.com/LASHYBILLS/status/2028798472145522973
One of the lil boys auntie who raped and put rocks in the little girl mouth went live defending their behavior
https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2028948000761078198
You cannot convince me that the father of the 12 year old rapist is any less responsible for his child’s crime than the dad in the school shooting case. In fact the 12 year old’s parents are worse. They’re actively defending their child’s actions after the fact.
Every conservative AG across the country should be filing the same charges to the parents of every black/latino gangbanger.
Why do you hate single minority mothers!? /s
At this point I unironically want them sterilized.
I think that's the idea. Get a trend established that parents will be facing criminal accountability for the actions of their child, and work towards doing that nationwide.
Bullshit. They will only do it to whites.
Yet it's only been done to white parents of school shooters...
Putting aside the issue of holding a separate person criminally liable for the actions of another, and instead focusing on race, have you considered the possibility that maybe the authorities have given up trying to help non whites have better outcomes in life? By not holding them to account, they are unlikely to ever change and improve, and will continue to be recidivists. Whereas other white families might actually see what happens, put down their devices, take the devices out of their childs hands, and actually parent them for the first time and eventually result in that kid not being a dumbass on their way to prison.
Incorrect strategy.
Sue the schools.
Kids spend more time there anyways.
If you don't destroy the schools this problem keeps going.
I kept dropping hints to the DA that they should charge this bitch for her grandson's actions because her constant interference in hiding him from his dad etc enabled his crime.
I was reading it took less than two hours for the jury to find him guilty on all counts. I wonder if it took them 10 minutes and they just waited around for the sake of propriety.
It's sad that you know this won't be applied equally. White parents are going to be disproportionately charged while POC parents won't be held to any standard
Well you have to understand liberal logic. The parents of white shooters are responsible for raising monsters. The parents of black shooters are not responsible for raising monsters; slavery caused that. And white people are responsible for slavery.
Yea.. because he kept the receipts.. has son who is known to have problems.. gives him a gun for Christmas.. leaves him unsupervised with the gun and ammo.
Unless they held the girl down or lured her over to be raped it's not really comparable.
To be clear, in both cases, the parents should NOT be sued unless they directly participated in the crime. I don't think either of these examples extend to that circumstance. This is the state inviting itself into co-parent with every child in their jurisdiction. It's exceedingly evil.
In this case, actually, sue the School, they also knew he had problems, they negligently kept him enrolled, endangering everyone. They had even had a monetary motive for doing so. They literally opened the door for him that morning.
Uh, I'm not sure exactly where you're going with that, but you might recall they put fucking rocks in her mouth to stop her screaming. That doesn't fit easily into whatever kind of bizarre sliding scale of culpability you're using, but it's in the neighborhood I would think.
The parents did this?
Or the kids?
Some kids, under either the tutelage or the active neglect of their parents, obviously. But let's return to what you said a moment. What's with that stuff about it being somehow different if she was restrained or lured?
If you don't want your kids beaten, tortured or disarmed then.. hey.. don't send them to public school, dipshit.
You can't have it both ways.
It's always an option. If it isn't it's because you're not willing to sacrifice enough for your children. Again, dude should not be in jail, but he made a bet. He bet incorrectly.
We had a White nation. What happened?
It really isn't.
CPS exists.
Then move.
You can't take the devils money and then pretend you're Godly.
"We can't move because of work. Or because of the house. Or because of some other made up bullshit."
Get real. You make excuses for the morally lazy. I wonder why?
Let me start by saying, I'd be 100% on board with the rapist being tried, convicted, and sentenced to euthanisia along with the people defending him.
But. Shooter's dad was "negligent" to the point of nearly being a co-conspirator. And yes; that same standard should applied to everyone at the ATF who armed the cartels.
"Aren't bank robberies awesome? Wouldn't it be a rush to rob a bank? I hate the people at our local branch."
"Merry Christmas bro. I got you a shotgun, balaklava, and a sack with a dollar sign on it."
I get your point, but there's a blurry line between when it becomes contributory in a reasonable person's eyes. It being a kid that he's responsible for ups the burden of responsibility. Assuming the prosecution's statement is accurate that is.
I don't disagree, but also wouldn't buy you a gun as a gift now.
Jury's don't work anymore. People convict on feelings.
Judges are equally corrupt and often emotional and agenda driven so judge only courtrooms wouldn't solve the problem either.
But basically if I was in a derek chauvin situation and there were a few black people and women, I'd be like, "good bye freedom."
As razorfist points out jury of your peers means they ought to be more inclined towards you and your general way than against.
If people who have no vested interest in convicting you still convict you over overwhelming evidence then the beyond a reasonable doubt criteria has been much closer to satisfied.
A conservative white guy should have conservative white guys as his peers.
The only problem is conservative white guys will be the only ones seeking justice regardless of any other factors.
If a ghetto black guy has a jury of ghetto black types, that gang banger is getting declared innocent every single time.
My opinion of a potential way that would have closer to blind justice.
Remove all names, remove the ability for lawyers to make emotion appeal based arguments, don't let anyone see or know who the accused is.
Prosecutors present "subject a is accused of perpetuating x crime against victims b. Remove the skin color and name and sex of victims.
The jury is only allowed to wrestle with the facts of the case.
They don't know if the perpetrator is white, black, Muslim, Asian, etc.
Only after they hand down the verdict do details of the case be revealed.
Now people could get pretty good at guessing based on the nature of the crimes but they could never be 100% sure.
And without emotional arguments being allowed to be used, the juries would just go "I guess this points to scenario a over scenario b so we'll declare innocent or guilty depending on what the facts say.
When you can be sentenced for being the wrong skin color or political alignment. And being at the wrong place at the wrong time, yeah activist juries are worse than a bad judge in some cases.
That's why all parties identification should be off the table. Hate crime was basically let's make white people have harsher sentences to "balance the scales". That's not blind justice.
If the crime is murder then follow the evidence, not the emotion or the narrative, likewise for every other crime.
I agree. 12-year-old rapists shouldn't be put in prison. Hell, neither should 52-year-old rapists.
Reported for rule 2 violation.
Edit:
I don't know what I expected. I figured it was pretty obvious that AoV was advocating for the death penalty for rapists and it went over peoples heads. My obviously sarcastic post clearly did as well.
Is it against the rules to support the death penalty? Honest question, because I haven't really seen that addressed.
It used to be. Then the site traffic died down, our old mod stopped getting his checks, and we got new ones that made more reasonable rules.
U rappin' AWFUL
Imagine being this jewish