Just do the same as alcohol and smoking and put age restrictions.
Just not as retarded as alcohol as 21 in places to drink is too high. If you are old enough to be sent to die for your country, you should be allowed to drink at that age too!
I think if we're going to legalize it we should compromise by making it socially unacceptable. I really want to ban it just so I don't have to smell it out in public, but I'm also not willing to die on this hill. Just keep that shit at home and we can have a truce.
While true, I think this is a case of picking and choosing one's battles. There are more important things to be addressing at the moment and we can revisit this one later when our civilization isn't about to fucking collapse under the weight of infinity third worlders.
Problem is, Colorado and Oregon were once purple-leaning-red, but then all the dudeweedlmaos voted for faggotry and mass migration because it was on the ballot (or they just smoked themselves retarded idk). Now they've been irreversibly Californized.
I don't really have a strong opinion on it either way. It's probably not the most harmful form of goyslop. But I can't see it doing too much good either.
prohibition was intentional to help jews make more money by selling it under the table
Trump's grandfather (the one who fled Germany to avoid military service in WW1) was one of those jews who profited from the Prohibition by selling it under the table in his house of ill repute (yep he also ran a whorehouse)
a lot of people profited from the prohibition, mainly criminals (i.e Italian Mafia) so its pretty much the same shit with drugs today where its mostly criminals who profit from said "illicit" substances that our ancestors consumed with their morning coffee
Who cares if someone smokes it, vapes it or ingests it as an edible/oil? You need to heat up THC for it to become active in the first place and smoking is the quickest and easiest way to do it.
What the fuck are you even on about. If I drink a beer, nobody pays for it but me. If I smoke a joint, nobody pays for it but me.
Perhaps you shouldn't let your view on cannabis be defined by Seth Rogen and niggers. Hemp is one of the oldest and most important agricultural plants in human history even if a bunch industrials decided to lobby to ban it to increase their profit margins. The prohibition of cannabis is a recent thing in human history.
lol, medical problems. lol, lowered social cohesion. lol, drunk driving.
If I smoke a joint, nobody pays for it but me.
lol, medical problems. lol, lowered social cohesion. lol, stoned driving.
Perhaps you shouldn't let your view on cannabis be defined by Seth Rogen and niggers.
You cannot achieve any health benefits from the plant from smoking it. Period. Bar none. No one, anywhere, benefits from your degeneracy. Not even you.
Hemp is one of the oldest and most important agricultural plants in human history
You can drink without driving. You can drink and still have strong social cohesion. You can even drink and it not affect any significant medical problems. Same with weed.
I refuse to blame a substance for the poor decisions of an individual. If you drive while impaired it's not the fault of whatever drug you consumed but entirely your own.
But while we're at it let's ban mobile phones. And talking. And listening to music. Because all of that distracts drivers which regularly leads to accidents.
Also sleep deprivation is a big cause of accidents. Better just ban driving all together considering how many sober retards are driving and causing accidents through sheer stupidity. Ban guns while we're at it too.
lol, lowered social cohesion.
Let's go for alcohol prohibition again. Worked so well for improving 'social cohesion' the last time that was tried.
But thinking that social drinking lowers social cohesion is one very bold claim.
but muh addiction
You can literally get addicted to anything and it'll ruin your life. Just be a responsible adult instead of shifting blame.
You cannot achieve any health benefits from the plant from smoking it.
You can only achieve health benefits of THC by heating it up first to activate it. Otherwise it has no effect whatsoever. Smoking it is the quickest way to do it.
You obviously possess very little knowledge of cannabis and its effects.
I refuse to blame a substance for the poor decisions of an individual.
Imagine still shilling the “we are all equal” line, holy fuck.
Let's go for alcohol prohibition again.
Okay.
Worked so well for improving 'social cohesion' the last time that was tried.
It did, yeah.
But thinking that social drinking lowers social cohesion is one very bold claim.
Good thing no one made it.
You can literally get addicted to anything and it'll ruin your life.
Damn breathing. Just one more.
Just be a responsible adult
Imagine still shilling the “we are all equal” line, holy fuck.
You can only achieve health benefits of THC by heating it up first to activate it. Otherwise it has no effect whatsoever. Smoking it is the quickest way to do it.
Yes, please continue saying things that were disproven decades ago.
You obviously possess very little knowledge of cannabis and its effects.
Watch as a communist judge (correctly) rules this EO unconstitutional. And watch as the Democrats flail on TV by pretending that they never supported the thing their constituency worships.
”lol I’ll pull the words out of context and then lie about it ha ha now my inability to reply is covered up!”
Which is it? You hate weed because you’re paid to say the opposite of Drumpf. But I also hate weed for objective reasons. And you hate me because you’re a jew. So… what position are you taking here? Are you DUDE WEED LMAO? Or are you against Blump?
The change was made the correct way. When I looked it up to double check my opinion on your comment all the branches have a job to do in this situation. If you wanted to be more accurate you could say one branch will fuck up their role.
However this was done the way it was supposed to be done.
You guys realize medical pot has been available for DECADES, right? Literally everywhere. I knew people who had it prescribed in the fucking 90's; and it wasn't a fucking joint, it was a PILL.
All this does is make pot even more ubiquitous. You're gonna have pot heads smoking absolutely fucking everywhere.
So it's fine if its a pill that is probably stupidly expensive even though cannabis could actually be dirt cheap because it is a plant that literally grows everywhere if given the chance?
Generic dronabinol costs like $14 for 60 pills. Making thc and cbd in pill form is not expensive or difficult. Allowing ((big pharma)) to monopolize the market is expensive; just look at insulin prices.
I know it's not expensive. Most drugs aren't expensive to manufacture. But growing your own cannabis is even less expensive and you have complete control over what you consume. You can grow the exact strain of cannabis that has the best effects for your needs. And also naturally grown is generally better than synthesized.
I used to be a libertarian and didnt care if people smoked pot. I had never tried it. finally did in my mid twenties and smoked daily for over a year. I cant go to the grocery store without seeing several stoned slots shuffling their way through the store with glazed eyes. stoners should be enslaved
if it was universally applied, then okay. But ex post facto laws are unconstitutional in the U.S.
A law banning marijuana usage would have a period of several months after it had been passed before it would take effect, just like what has been done with other prohibitions. This would give current stones several months to get their shit together. if you aren't addicted then it shouldnt be any problem to stop.
I don't know anyone who consistently smokes pot who hasn't destroyed their own lives themselves. Many wouldn't consider their lives destroyed, but from the outside, it's hard to argue otherwise.
By that logic, let em have heroin, crack, fent, and meth too. If they're gonna ruin their own lives, they may as well go all out.
Individualism is a fallacy. No one stands alone and suffers the consequences of their own mistakes in a vacuum. Even the most introverted, isolated agoraphobe is part of a community, and their personal actions affect that community, whether they will it or not. Faggots being faggots in their bedrooms negatively affect their entire community.
It IS the governments job to foster the overall health and wellbeing of its people. A degenerate people creates a degenerate government.
Medical pot was everywhere for the same reason it is legal recreationally in so many states: because those states told the feds to go fuck themselves on the issue. This EO is the feds saying "OK, we will go fuck ourselves."
I don't care if people are smoking pot everywhere. The 10th amendment is still on the books and should still mean something.
it is important to note that marijuana is simply moved from schedule 1 to schedule 3. marijuana is still federally illegal. if you're in a state that requires background checks for firearms, it is still illegal to be "a user of" marijuana products when buying firearms.
Federally illegal unless you have a legit prescription. Like how tons of Americans have prescriptions for adderall or opioids, both of which are schedule two drugs, and haven't lost their right to bear arms. This also means that dispensaries handing out joints are going to start being replaced by pharmacies and THC pills.
While he's at it he should put troomer drugs on the controlled substances schedule. Using them to troon out should result in drug charges.
Selling them to minors should be the death penalty.
I like this idea
Trump would never tackle the tranny problem because a lot of (((groomers))) are part of the chosen elite...
Good, I've never done drugs but always viewed this as idiotic to make illegal. Too many ways to use it effectively in medicine.
Prohibition didn't work for alcohol after all. Still think it shouldn't be fully legalized.
Just do the same as alcohol and smoking and put age restrictions.
Just not as retarded as alcohol as 21 in places to drink is too high. If you are old enough to be sent to die for your country, you should be allowed to drink at that age too!
Israel's not my country. But I see your point.
Ah yes, the war with Venezuela is for Israel.
Dumbass.
Yeah, dogshit posted by a retard. Your point?
Smarter and better researched than anything you've ever posted.
It is, yeah. Drink bleach, jewish woman.
It was impossible for me to tell you were trying to be ironic here
Raise the enlistment and voting ages to 21, then.
I think if we're going to legalize it we should compromise by making it socially unacceptable. I really want to ban it just so I don't have to smell it out in public, but I'm also not willing to die on this hill. Just keep that shit at home and we can have a truce.
That hasn't worked out once so far. We said the same about faggotry.
While true, I think this is a case of picking and choosing one's battles. There are more important things to be addressing at the moment and we can revisit this one later when our civilization isn't about to fucking collapse under the weight of infinity third worlders.
Problem is, Colorado and Oregon were once purple-leaning-red, but then all the dudeweedlmaos voted for faggotry and mass migration because it was on the ballot (or they just smoked themselves retarded idk). Now they've been irreversibly Californized.
I don't really have a strong opinion on it either way. It's probably not the most harmful form of goyslop. But I can't see it doing too much good either.
America.
It should. There is no reason for it not to be fully legalized.
prohibition was intentional to help jews make more money by selling it under the table
Trump's grandfather (the one who fled Germany to avoid military service in WW1) was one of those jews who profited from the Prohibition by selling it under the table in his house of ill repute (yep he also ran a whorehouse)
a lot of people profited from the prohibition, mainly criminals (i.e Italian Mafia) so its pretty much the same shit with drugs today where its mostly criminals who profit from said "illicit" substances that our ancestors consumed with their morning coffee
Agreed.
Yes. None of which involve smoking it, so what exactly is the idiotic part?
Who cares if someone smokes it, vapes it or ingests it as an edible/oil? You need to heat up THC for it to become active in the first place and smoking is the quickest and easiest way to do it.
As I said earlier, “DUDE WEED LMAO.”
Society cares. Go be a degenerate somewhere else, and don’t expect us to pay for your sins.
Mainly because tradcucks are all broke and leech off the childless' tax dollars.
What the fuck are you even on about. If I drink a beer, nobody pays for it but me. If I smoke a joint, nobody pays for it but me.
Perhaps you shouldn't let your view on cannabis be defined by Seth Rogen and niggers. Hemp is one of the oldest and most important agricultural plants in human history even if a bunch industrials decided to lobby to ban it to increase their profit margins. The prohibition of cannabis is a recent thing in human history.
Well, I know where your brain cells went.
lol, medical problems. lol, lowered social cohesion. lol, drunk driving.
lol, medical problems. lol, lowered social cohesion. lol, stoned driving.
You cannot achieve any health benefits from the plant from smoking it. Period. Bar none. No one, anywhere, benefits from your degeneracy. Not even you.
Cool; no one’s denying this.
Hey, I'll let you in on a really fun secret:
You can drink without driving. You can drink and still have strong social cohesion. You can even drink and it not affect any significant medical problems. Same with weed.
Cool. Guess we better allow niggers, spics, slants, and dune coons to live among us because sometimes they don’t harm us, right?
I refuse to blame a substance for the poor decisions of an individual. If you drive while impaired it's not the fault of whatever drug you consumed but entirely your own.
But while we're at it let's ban mobile phones. And talking. And listening to music. Because all of that distracts drivers which regularly leads to accidents.
Also sleep deprivation is a big cause of accidents. Better just ban driving all together considering how many sober retards are driving and causing accidents through sheer stupidity. Ban guns while we're at it too.
Let's go for alcohol prohibition again. Worked so well for improving 'social cohesion' the last time that was tried.
But thinking that social drinking lowers social cohesion is one very bold claim.
You can literally get addicted to anything and it'll ruin your life. Just be a responsible adult instead of shifting blame.
You can only achieve health benefits of THC by heating it up first to activate it. Otherwise it has no effect whatsoever. Smoking it is the quickest way to do it.
You obviously possess very little knowledge of cannabis and its effects.
Imagine still shilling the “we are all equal” line, holy fuck.
Okay.
It did, yeah.
Good thing no one made it.
Damn breathing. Just one more.
Imagine still shilling the “we are all equal” line, holy fuck.
Yes, please continue saying things that were disproven decades ago.
Cool, enjoy your mental illness.
Marijuana tea is a suprisingly effective sleep pill
i wish all of Europe decided to say no to the pharma jews and legalized it (fully, that way you can grow the medicine in your own garden)
Watch as a communist judge (correctly) rules this EO unconstitutional. And watch as the Democrats flail on TV by pretending that they never supported the thing their constituency worships.
The Executive Branch of government is in charge of the schedule list. You do know who's in charge of that branch don't you?
For the purpose of the statement being made, I don’t give a shit about objective reality. New to American policies, are you?
Yeah, that's why you're a stormfaggot.
Which is it? You hate weed because you’re paid to say the opposite of Drumpf. But I also hate weed for objective reasons. And you hate me because you’re a jew. So… what position are you taking here? Are you DUDE WEED LMAO? Or are you against Blump?
The change was made the correct way. When I looked it up to double check my opinion on your comment all the branches have a job to do in this situation. If you wanted to be more accurate you could say one branch will fuck up their role.
However this was done the way it was supposed to be done.
If this happens I'll give you $5000.
Save this comment so that you can cash in later!
Where’s my jew confetti.
It’s for you when you have a link to someone who used to support weed suddenly against it after this EO.
Also, the whole article isn't available due to a paywall. What's the risk that's being discussed here?
K, did.
Hate that, yeah. Here you go.
Cool! Was this guy a big pro weed advocate before?
You guys realize medical pot has been available for DECADES, right? Literally everywhere. I knew people who had it prescribed in the fucking 90's; and it wasn't a fucking joint, it was a PILL.
All this does is make pot even more ubiquitous. You're gonna have pot heads smoking absolutely fucking everywhere.
So it's fine if its a pill that is probably stupidly expensive even though cannabis could actually be dirt cheap because it is a plant that literally grows everywhere if given the chance?
Generic dronabinol costs like $14 for 60 pills. Making thc and cbd in pill form is not expensive or difficult. Allowing ((big pharma)) to monopolize the market is expensive; just look at insulin prices.
I know it's not expensive. Most drugs aren't expensive to manufacture. But growing your own cannabis is even less expensive and you have complete control over what you consume. You can grow the exact strain of cannabis that has the best effects for your needs. And also naturally grown is generally better than synthesized.
I used to be a libertarian and didnt care if people smoked pot. I had never tried it. finally did in my mid twenties and smoked daily for over a year. I cant go to the grocery store without seeing several stoned slots shuffling their way through the store with glazed eyes. stoners should be enslaved
Boy howdy, wait till you meet beaners.
Including you?
well, since I am no longer a stoner, no. but I should have been. a term of a few years of forced labor would be beneficial to many.
You still should be. You haven’t served your punishment. Would you accept those terms and serve years of forced labor because you were once a stoner?
if it was universally applied, then okay. But ex post facto laws are unconstitutional in the U.S.
A law banning marijuana usage would have a period of several months after it had been passed before it would take effect, just like what has been done with other prohibitions. This would give current stones several months to get their shit together. if you aren't addicted then it shouldnt be any problem to stop.
You think that makes sense? Being forced into hard labor just because you smoked weed?
yes
My mother had to get people to sneak weed to her while she was fighting cancer in TX.
I don't know anyone who consistently smokes pot who hasn't destroyed their own lives themselves. Many wouldn't consider their lives destroyed, but from the outside, it's hard to argue otherwise.
By that logic, let em have heroin, crack, fent, and meth too. If they're gonna ruin their own lives, they may as well go all out.
Individualism is a fallacy. No one stands alone and suffers the consequences of their own mistakes in a vacuum. Even the most introverted, isolated agoraphobe is part of a community, and their personal actions affect that community, whether they will it or not. Faggots being faggots in their bedrooms negatively affect their entire community.
It IS the governments job to foster the overall health and wellbeing of its people. A degenerate people creates a degenerate government.
Medical pot was everywhere for the same reason it is legal recreationally in so many states: because those states told the feds to go fuck themselves on the issue. This EO is the feds saying "OK, we will go fuck ourselves."
I don't care if people are smoking pot everywhere. The 10th amendment is still on the books and should still mean something.
Do you want more or less people high on marijuana when you walk down the street?
That desperate for votes? 🤣
It is absolutely no where close to being “effectively legalized”. I want what you’re smoking OP
Legalized for prescription medical use.
Well need a lawsuit, don't think he can just change the schedule of drugs with a pen swipe, pretty sure there are processes for these things
There is a process. If you read the article, you would see that the FDA review at the beginning of the process ended in 2023.
it is important to note that marijuana is simply moved from schedule 1 to schedule 3. marijuana is still federally illegal. if you're in a state that requires background checks for firearms, it is still illegal to be "a user of" marijuana products when buying firearms.
Federally illegal unless you have a legit prescription. Like how tons of Americans have prescriptions for adderall or opioids, both of which are schedule two drugs, and haven't lost their right to bear arms. This also means that dispensaries handing out joints are going to start being replaced by pharmacies and THC pills.