Lol. I want to know what that guy's thought process was like over the last few years. "Wow I married engaged Sydney Sweeney I'm a gigachad and the luckiest man in the world" to full Anakin Skywalker "I HATE YOU! WHORE! ALL IS LOST!"
The same situation happened to Mary Elizabeth Winstead's husband after she met Ewan Macgregor, and I know it broke that guy in half. You could read it all over his face on their announcement photo. If your wife is a tall, adorable brunette, never let her act with Ewan Macgregor.
Too many guys see women as investments, which is a mistake. A healthy thought process is "I got her free when she was submissive at her prime and the rest of the men are getting her in the decline. Haha, suckers." Then move on.
Thinking you own a woman cause of a ring and she's yours for life is feminine thinking. It's only your turn enjoy it while it's your turn.
It's only your turn enjoy it while it's your turn.
This state of affairs is the collapse of civilization.
If a man cannot reasonably expect to lock down a woman to form a stable family with then there is zero reason for him to get up in the morning and maintain civilization. This may be how things are at the moment but it cannot be allowed to continue like this or the consequences will be disastrous.
I dislike the nonchalant acceptance of it all that I see getting perpetuated in online discourse.
Give first rights for full custody of children to men
Lower taxes by 80%
Lower gov spending by 80% while cutting all social programs
Abolish the Civil Rights Act
Abolish the Immigration Act and only let White people immigrate
End 50/50 division of assets and make it what-you-bring-in-you-get-out
Give kids the default for inheritance of a parent not the spouse
This would start to change things in a positive manner.
I agree that this is not a great state of affairs but it's the correct one given the state we're in. Men cannot expect women to be in their lives any longer than the moment she gets up from his bed. We've given incentive for women to leave men in our society.
Lower gov spending by 80% while cutting all social programs
I was with you up until here. You'd need to overthrow the government and install a new one to make that happen. If that's actually the game plan then fair enough, but anything short of that is a complete non-starter on this bullet point. The rest is pretty on point.
I dislike the nonchalant acceptance of it all that I see getting perpetuated in online discourse.
Its literally the only option available to men short of forcefully removing rights from women. They aren't going to vote themselves back into the kitchen.
So unless you are ready to promote some extreme gender violence to buck break them back into the correct form, which I'm here for but I doubt you are, then the two choices men have are to accept reality as it is or drive themselves insane pretending its not.
I'm not opposed to in in principle, but I have serious misgivings about whether I'd actually have the stomach for it myself. However the larger issue of course is that if you do any of that then the government shows up at your doorstep and puts you in cage, so until that's addressed it doesn't really matter.
Problem is you're gonna be the one on the plantation if you get legally involved. Unless male authority is reestablished the smart move is to make sure your shit doesn't get fucked up by giving the walking disaster that is the woman a wide berth.
Legally it's all bad. I'm just talking about the human element. If you start with "I let her handle herself and our decisionmaking is 50/50," you're done for.
They fought for the right to engage in this destructive behavior and we're in the process of committing societal suicide at the altar of female choice. I don't think treating them like the sociopathic whores they are is unreasonable. If they don't like dealing with the consequences of their decisions we can always go back to the old system. You know, the one that works.
Nah. That would have been replying with, "who was joking?"
This is just Dealing With Journalists 101 stuff. Should be the bare minimum. Still puts her way beyond most celebrities.
Her media training person deserves a raise. She is a jiu-jitsu blackbelt against these journo hacks.
I could tell she is sharp as hell when I saw a clip of her reacting to comments about her, one of which was "Oh great, another dumb blonde with big tits." Her perfect response was to just laugh and say "I'm actually a brunette."
The only other female celebrity I can think of who is as good at dealing with the press is Dolly Parton.
Agree and amplify is almost always the right play when people are being ridiculous. Women are typically incapable of this strategy, however, because they can never ever agree with you. Not even in jest.
Crazy that the ad was controversial. I thought it was a nice play on words. Also a return to putting attractive people in ads. There is a reason companies don’t want me advertising their product
Acknowledging genetics as a positive thing about white people is blaspheme to the Left. Once you allow that line of thinking in whatsoever they are terrified people will recognize that certain genes are in fact "superior" by all objective measures that cannot be denied.
And once people can say "pretty skinny white girls are more attractive than Lizzo sized black shebeasts" then all their media control starts to crumble.
Keep in mind that this is the thot who was selling soap with her bathwater in it. It's fine to praise her refusal to kowtow to the usual suspects but let's not hold her up as some based trad type (no woman is).
She’s stupid hot…..what’s hilarious is how there was a concerted effort from the left to pretend she’s not hot AF. They wanted so badly to knock her down a peg or two because we all know she has great genes, and they’re White, the best kind.
She became a symbol of White superiority just because of how beautiful she is, they all knew it, and we knew it. So of course they want to destroy her, just like they want to destroy our monuments and our nation….the anti-White hate is deeply ingrained in all leftists, which is insane considering the vast majority of leftists are White.
Have to note that she
divorced her husbandbroke off her engagement when she got turbo-famous for her boobs, but other than that,based
They never married, it was an engagement.
And there are some hints it was for political reasons.
I want to believe
I mean she dumped him a week or so before the inauguration.
That's just female nature. Can't hold it against her for being a woman.
Lol. I want to know what that guy's thought process was like over the last few years. "Wow I
marriedengaged Sydney Sweeney I'm a gigachad and the luckiest man in the world" to full Anakin Skywalker "I HATE YOU! WHORE! ALL IS LOST!"The same situation happened to Mary Elizabeth Winstead's husband after she met Ewan Macgregor, and I know it broke that guy in half. You could read it all over his face on their announcement photo. If your wife is a tall, adorable brunette, never let her act with Ewan Macgregor.
Too many guys see women as investments, which is a mistake. A healthy thought process is "I got her free when she was submissive at her prime and the rest of the men are getting her in the decline. Haha, suckers." Then move on.
Thinking you own a woman cause of a ring and she's yours for life is feminine thinking. It's only your turn enjoy it while it's your turn.
This state of affairs is the collapse of civilization.
If a man cannot reasonably expect to lock down a woman to form a stable family with then there is zero reason for him to get up in the morning and maintain civilization. This may be how things are at the moment but it cannot be allowed to continue like this or the consequences will be disastrous.
I dislike the nonchalant acceptance of it all that I see getting perpetuated in online discourse.
This would start to change things in a positive manner.
I agree that this is not a great state of affairs but it's the correct one given the state we're in. Men cannot expect women to be in their lives any longer than the moment she gets up from his bed. We've given incentive for women to leave men in our society.
I was with you up until here. You'd need to overthrow the government and install a new one to make that happen. If that's actually the game plan then fair enough, but anything short of that is a complete non-starter on this bullet point. The rest is pretty on point.
Lowering taxes by 80% and not cutting spending would be a complete disaster. It's the spending that's the biggest problem.
Without cutting spending, nothing else matters. This is the most important point.
Its literally the only option available to men short of forcefully removing rights from women. They aren't going to vote themselves back into the kitchen.
So unless you are ready to promote some extreme gender violence to buck break them back into the correct form, which I'm here for but I doubt you are, then the two choices men have are to accept reality as it is or drive themselves insane pretending its not.
I'm not opposed to in in principle, but I have serious misgivings about whether I'd actually have the stomach for it myself. However the larger issue of course is that if you do any of that then the government shows up at your doorstep and puts you in cage, so until that's addressed it doesn't really matter.
Your view of women is much more modern redpill than mine. The way I think of it is "keep her on the plantation." Lol
Problem is you're gonna be the one on the plantation if you get legally involved. Unless male authority is reestablished the smart move is to make sure your shit doesn't get fucked up by giving the walking disaster that is the woman a wide berth.
Legally it's all bad. I'm just talking about the human element. If you start with "I let her handle herself and our decisionmaking is 50/50," you're done for.
Yup, if you're going to deal with them at all make sure you're in a position to make a clean break when your turn riding the whore comes to an end.
They fought for the right to engage in this destructive behavior and we're in the process of committing societal suicide at the altar of female choice. I don't think treating them like the sociopathic whores they are is unreasonable. If they don't like dealing with the consequences of their decisions we can always go back to the old system. You know, the one that works.
Nah. That would have been replying with, "who was joking?"
This is just Dealing With Journalists 101 stuff. Should be the bare minimum. Still puts her way beyond most celebrities.
Her media training person deserves a raise. She is a jiu-jitsu blackbelt against these journo hacks.
I could tell she is sharp as hell when I saw a clip of her reacting to comments about her, one of which was "Oh great, another dumb blonde with big tits." Her perfect response was to just laugh and say "I'm actually a brunette."
The only other female celebrity I can think of who is as good at dealing with the press is Dolly Parton.
Agree and amplify is almost always the right play when people are being ridiculous. Women are typically incapable of this strategy, however, because they can never ever agree with you. Not even in jest.
You definitely have a point, as Sydney and Dolly might be the only two I have ever seen do it.
If I had a penny for every time I joked about white supremacy, I'd have no pennies because it's not a joke.
We're not joking.
Crazy that the ad was controversial. I thought it was a nice play on words. Also a return to putting attractive people in ads. There is a reason companies don’t want me advertising their product
Acknowledging genetics as a positive thing about white people is blaspheme to the Left. Once you allow that line of thinking in whatsoever they are terrified people will recognize that certain genes are in fact "superior" by all objective measures that cannot be denied.
And once people can say "pretty skinny white girls are more attractive than Lizzo sized black shebeasts" then all their media control starts to crumble.
True. Just funny how many overweight women were trotted out with them demanding that we say they are the most beautiful
Keep in mind that this is the thot who was selling soap with her bathwater in it. It's fine to praise her refusal to kowtow to the usual suspects but let's not hold her up as some based trad type (no woman is).
Now why would the journos blurt out something like that? It's like those abhuman critters are compensating for something huehuehue
She’s stupid hot…..what’s hilarious is how there was a concerted effort from the left to pretend she’s not hot AF. They wanted so badly to knock her down a peg or two because we all know she has great genes, and they’re White, the best kind.
The left wants her raped or acid thrown on her face because of sheer jealous, envy, rage and insanity.
She became a symbol of White superiority just because of how beautiful she is, they all knew it, and we knew it. So of course they want to destroy her, just like they want to destroy our monuments and our nation….the anti-White hate is deeply ingrained in all leftists, which is insane considering the vast majority of leftists are White.
Self hatred is a powerful thing thst leaks out of people into the rest of society.
Just so you know she can be even sexier, here’s proof.
https://files.catbox.moe/gm98p4.MP4
Valve should put her in a commercial for their new set top box and how it's still PC master race
She handled that news bitch with remarkable calm