Lower gov spending by 80% while cutting all social programs
I was with you up until here. You'd need to overthrow the government and install a new one to make that happen. If that's actually the game plan then fair enough, but anything short of that is a complete non-starter on this bullet point. The rest is pretty on point.
I'm saying you're absolutely retarded if you think you're going to get the government to reduce either spending or taxes by 80% without violently overthrowing it and installing your own first. It's a child's fantasy to think that you can get the government to reduce its operations but such a large degree.
I was with you up until here. You'd need to overthrow the government and install a new one to make that happen. If that's actually the game plan then fair enough, but anything short of that is a complete non-starter on this bullet point. The rest is pretty on point.
Lowering taxes by 80% and not cutting spending would be a complete disaster. It's the spending that's the biggest problem.
Without cutting spending, nothing else matters. This is the most important point.
I'm saying you're absolutely retarded if you think you're going to get the government to reduce either spending or taxes by 80% without violently overthrowing it and installing your own first. It's a child's fantasy to think that you can get the government to reduce its operations but such a large degree.
I don't actually think anything will get better so yeah, you're right.