Reminder, epstein was mossad
(twitter.com)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Kind of weird for Mike Benz to post this since I think he's Jewish and avoids talking about Israel. It's good that he's reminding people about the facts though
Not to mention seemed to know intricate details of the democrats funding machine just as they shifted away from supporting Israel.
I'm wary of Benz ever since it came to light that he had an alter-ego as Frame Game, an alt-right ethnonationalist, which he eventually claimed was an elaborate deradicalisation op to make WN types hate Jews less.
Everything he says is usually true and insightful. In light of this history though, one always has to wonder when there's something more important that he's not saying.
What’s wrong with the work he did as Frame Game?
He said a lot of valuable stuff :
“the right always tries to win, but with keeping their ethical-hymen intact. The left has no concerns as long as they win”
Benz claims it was literally controlled opposition - a group psyop ran by jews for the purpose of cushioning against worsening anti-semitism. I don't have to believe his claims that Frames Games improved the world for jews, I only know that his current line is that he thinks it did and that it was the entire purpose. If he's telling the truth, it was the right being unethically psyopped in order to prevent them reaching anti-semitic conclusions. If he's lying now to cover his ass, it introduces at minimum the realisation he's a snaky jew who'll say any old bullshit when under pressure, even if 99% of the other stuff he says seems useful.
The post doesn't mention Israel or Mossad, at least not anywhere visible to me.
That connection can requires the additional information the Ghislaine's dad was a known Mossad double agent.
Before the Ted Cruz interview, I'd have asked: why would the American government be protecting a foreign intelligence agency.
BTW, I hate that people today can't be bothered to do any research and just post unadulterated AI slop.
Is this just a general rant or in reference to something in particular?
In the lower left image, you see "Thought for 1m 15s". So that's clearly ChatGPT's o3/o4.
People ask AI questions and then treat the response as Gospel.
Regardless of whether it's wrong in this case, and I see no reason to believe that it is.
Hmm. @grok is this true?
The Alexander Acosta quote is real at least, I had hunted it down yesterday for a comment in TheDonald, using what I had remembered of it from years ago.
I had, admittedly, misremembered it as "belongs to intelligence" rather than "belonged to intelligence", but found the right quote before this tweet was made, so I know it didn't come from him(also the article I found was dated to long ago)
If the first result is no good, maybe it's worse.
But the problem is that people seem to think that AI is reliable, when it's not. It's like Wikipedia in that respect.
Well right now that's literally the same thing, thanks to their useless new "feature."
"we don't aim to control content, just create context".
Except worse because it's not even real AI, it's a random number generator manipulated by faggots.
"People" that hand over their mental functions to this thing they're claiming to be AI are choosing to be subhumans.
Dicks out for Stonetear :`(
Some knew him as Paul Combetta, back before he topped himself by two shotgun cartridges to the back of his head while diving off of Obama's estate looking for oysters.
Literally the only thing that matters. We should just start loudly proclaiming everyone in government who defends Israel is on the list. It's probably true anyway