The Alexander Acosta quote is real at least, I had hunted it down yesterday for a comment in TheDonald, using what I had remembered of it from years ago.
I had, admittedly, misremembered it as "belongs to intelligence" rather than "belonged to intelligence", but found the right quote before this tweet was made, so I know it didn't come from him(also the article I found was dated to long ago)
Before the Ted Cruz interview, I'd have asked: why would the American government be protecting a foreign intelligence agency.
BTW, I hate that people today can't be bothered to do any research and just post unadulterated AI slop.
Is this just a general rant or in reference to something in particular?
In the lower left image, you see "Thought for 1m 15s". So that's clearly ChatGPT's o3/o4.
People ask AI questions and then treat the response as Gospel.
Regardless of whether it's wrong in this case, and I see no reason to believe that it is.
Hmm. @grok is this true?
The Alexander Acosta quote is real at least, I had hunted it down yesterday for a comment in TheDonald, using what I had remembered of it from years ago.
I had, admittedly, misremembered it as "belongs to intelligence" rather than "belonged to intelligence", but found the right quote before this tweet was made, so I know it didn't come from him(also the article I found was dated to long ago)
If the first result is no good, maybe it's worse.
But the problem is that people seem to think that AI is reliable, when it's not. It's like Wikipedia in that respect.
Well right now that's literally the same thing, thanks to their useless new "feature."