The mainstream media all work in conjunction with each other. America's MSM is not "free" and honestly the Lügenpresse should all be persecuted for being lying scum bags
And that was only one of the assortment of illegal and unethical programs revealed by the Church Committee hearings, which were followed by zero prosecutions.
No he didn't. That change allowed the state department to broadcast in the US, whereas previously they were restricted to airing their news segments overseas.
The first amendment has always protected the media from publishing lies. It was never illegal.
I said nitpicking because you said the state dept.
"were restricted to airing their news segments overseas."
Instead of calling government produced 'news segments' what the people who had restricted them to overseas in the first place knew them to be, propaganda.
That's not what nitpicking means though. You were correcting my usage of the term of the "news" which is fair enough. I only referred to it that way for simplicity sake.
But to say I'm nitpicking without explaining clearly implies you're referring to my main point, which was that Obama didn't "make it legal for the media to lie."
the media are the people The emperor's New Clothes warned us about. they say something is true, and a good percentage of their readers believe it without question. even when the truth is staring them in the face.
The mainstream media all work in conjunction with each other. America's MSM is not "free" and honestly the Lügenpresse should all be persecuted for being lying scum bags
Operation Mockingbird was exposed but never truly stopped, and 70 years later it has been more successful than they ever imagined.
And that was only one of the assortment of illegal and unethical programs revealed by the Church Committee hearings, which were followed by zero prosecutions.
JournoList.
They were all caught coordinating these blitzes in private group chats 20 years ago.
The days of an unbiased media reporting the news and letting you decide was a fantasy, wasn't it.
Obama legalized news publishing overt lies and propaganda, but it definitely existed prior to his great allowance.
No he didn't. That change allowed the state department to broadcast in the US, whereas previously they were restricted to airing their news segments overseas.
The first amendment has always protected the media from publishing lies. It was never illegal.
Fuck Obama though.
Nitpick, it legalized the government broadcasting propaganda inside the US.
It isn't a nitpick.
That makes it sound like it used to be illegal for CNN to lie. That's not true and pointing that out isn't a nitpick.
I said nitpicking because you said the state dept.
"were restricted to airing their news segments overseas."
Instead of calling government produced 'news segments' what the people who had restricted them to overseas in the first place knew them to be, propaganda.
That's not what nitpicking means though. You were correcting my usage of the term of the "news" which is fair enough. I only referred to it that way for simplicity sake.
But to say I'm nitpicking without explaining clearly implies you're referring to my main point, which was that Obama didn't "make it legal for the media to lie."
I was claiming that I was nitpicking not you
Next from the media :
“and if they are being genocided - here is why it is good”
...how is it that NBC and ABC are the only ones acknowledging that trump brought receipts, even if they question them? o.O#
the media are the people The emperor's New Clothes warned us about. they say something is true, and a good percentage of their readers believe it without question. even when the truth is staring them in the face.
You're next, Bibi!!!!
Right?, righht?