It's been proven (in mock trials) that black jurors are extremely biased depending on the race of the defendant. They're loathe to convict their own and eager to put whites away. Of course this was inconvenient to the authorities so the results were dismissed, but it proved what any white person with common sense already suspected. A single black juror increases conviction chances for whites by a large amount, regardless of circumstances or evidence.
That whole "jury of your peers" thing seems to be rather important and tragically overlooked as a core component of our justice system's ability to function in a just manner.
They always go to 'blacks were lynched' to cuck whites like they do Germany and WWII or women dying from 'coat hanger' abortions.
Massive red pill, I actually wondered how many there were so looked up the stats.
Turns out, at least in OK where I actually found historical data, the rate of lynchings of blacks/whites almost perfectly matched today's murder rate by race. Basically they didn't care what race you were, they lynched people who earned it.
As far as the KKK went, it was nearly 50-50%.
IDK about various other acts of vigilantism though. One would think it would lean highly White since Whites were 90% of the population when this was done.
Yeah, one would think violence should be 90% white if one believed in the blank slate theory that everybody is equally capable of incivility - you know the science deniers, flat earthers, adults that believe in Santa Claus.
One should base one's views on the most reliable data, which in this case is overall lynchings and race of victim. Generally there's a body and the race is recorded, but who did it and why is more nebulous. What one named group among others took credit for is not a solid foundation to work from.
I don’t see how Anthony could get off. The self defense argument is flimsier than paper mache. Now, that is me being logical. Let’s just say I’d be shocked if he got off or got some glorified slap in the wrist. Can the lady in the article file a civil lawsuit?
The local racial demographics are like 40% black, so the jury will have at least 4-5 blacks. This all but guarantees at least one juror who will refuse to convict, and you might even see a leftist coalition of 4+ blacks alongside 2-3 white female jurors. It’s gonna be OJ 2.0, complete with a bunch of confused white people refusing to acknowledge that justice in America is a racial referendum.
It's been proven (in mock trials) that black jurors are extremely biased depending on the race of the defendant. They're loathe to convict their own and eager to put whites away. Of course this was inconvenient to the authorities so the results were dismissed, but it proved what any white person with common sense already suspected. A single black juror increases conviction chances for whites by a large amount, regardless of circumstances or evidence.
Correct.
That whole "jury of your peers" thing seems to be rather important and tragically overlooked as a core component of our justice system's ability to function in a just manner.
If black murderers always got juries composed entirely of black people, then no black would ever go to jail for murdering a white person.
Well, guess we can't allow them to inhabit our civilization then. They're simply incompatible with it.
Yeah, but they'd only be murdering other blacks, so it's a self- correcting problem
a just society would have seen anthony hang the night of. he was caught red handed and a bunch of people saw him do it.
They always go to 'blacks were lynched' to cuck whites like they do Germany and WWII or women dying from 'coat hanger' abortions.
Massive red pill, I actually wondered how many there were so looked up the stats.
Turns out, at least in OK where I actually found historical data, the rate of lynchings of blacks/whites almost perfectly matched today's murder rate by race. Basically they didn't care what race you were, they lynched people who earned it.
But blacks earn it more, so...
As far as the KKK went, it was nearly 50-50%.
IDK about various other acts of vigilantism though. One would think it would lean highly White since Whites were 90% of the population when this was done.
Yeah, one would think violence should be 90% white if one believed in the blank slate theory that everybody is equally capable of incivility - you know the science deniers, flat earthers, adults that believe in Santa Claus.
One should base one's views on the most reliable data, which in this case is overall lynchings and race of victim. Generally there's a body and the race is recorded, but who did it and why is more nebulous. What one named group among others took credit for is not a solid foundation to work from.
A just society is one without any dindus in it.
My money is on being shot dead in some future altercation.
She's a tough lady though. Can't say the same for the piece of shit that attacked her. What a worthless coward.
Fooo man, He dindu nuffin. He's just an inocent lil boy
I don’t see how Anthony could get off. The self defense argument is flimsier than paper mache. Now, that is me being logical. Let’s just say I’d be shocked if he got off or got some glorified slap in the wrist. Can the lady in the article file a civil lawsuit?
All it takes is that one black who's tribal enough to refuse to convict.
The local racial demographics are like 40% black, so the jury will have at least 4-5 blacks. This all but guarantees at least one juror who will refuse to convict, and you might even see a leftist coalition of 4+ blacks alongside 2-3 white female jurors. It’s gonna be OJ 2.0, complete with a bunch of confused white people refusing to acknowledge that justice in America is a racial referendum.
Yea everything is a referendum apparently
>a civil lawsuit
Yeah, sure, his credit rating will never be the same after that.
Just makes me mad to see that happening to her