The Human Rights Tribunal ultimately ordered the Township to pay $10,000 to Borderland Pride, and for McQuaker to personally pay them another $5,000. This was lower than what Borderland Pride had been seeking; they wanted $15,000 from the township and $10,000 each from the three councillors who voted no.
These predators aren't just after kids either. They're trolling for your bank account too, so they can buy more poppers and afford more STD treatment.
The course is offered by the Ontario Human Rights Commission, and their latest edition opens with an animated video telling viewers that the Human Rights Code “is not meant to punish.”
Literally three paragraphs above this one:
The Human Rights Tribunal ultimately ordered the Township to pay $10,000 to Borderland Pride, and for McQuaker to personally pay them another $5,000.
They do not punish, they just fine when you do not do what they want when they want in the way they want.
“As a lawyer who does this work that means I’m going to start taking people’s houses and their vehicles and their toys and draining their bank accounts and garnishing their wages because no one is going to stop behaving this way until there are real consequences,” he said.
Using the Human Rights Code for "consequences", not "punishment"! Very different! Not petty or vindictive at all! Thank you for the clarification Borderland Pride director Douglas Judson.
What is the terrible human rights violation they're totally not punishing, you might ask?
The claim of discrimination ultimately hinged on a single line uttered by Emo Mayor Harold McQuaker. When the proclamation came up for consideration, McQuaker was heard to say in a recording of the meeting, “There’s no flag being flown for the other side of the coin … there’s no flags being flown for the straight people.”
As Human Rights Tribunal vice-chair Karen Dawson wrote in her decision, “I find this remark was demeaning and disparaging of the LGBTQ2 community of which Borderland Pride is a member and therefore constituted discrimination under the Code.”
Literal fucking Karens. I swear to god, allowing women into the judiciary was even worse than their universal suffrage. Most women's idea of fairness hinges entirely on subjective popularity rather than any form of principles or objectivity.
There's nothing demeaning about that. They are literally applying a bureaucratic equal standard. They would be told: "If you have a Catholic flag up, you'll need to make sure you're not excluding a Muslim flag". They know that already, so he's literally just saying, "if I need to abide by the law, I need to find a straight flag. Does anyone know where I can find them?"
Canada has it written in their dogshit Charter of Rights & Freedoms that it is perfectly legal to discriminate against whites, males and the old stock majority.
Using the Human Rights Code for "consequences", not "punishment"! Very different! Not petty or vindictive at all! Thank you for the clarification Borderland Pride director Douglas Judson.
They all (SJW lawyers) talk like this. The job of the rest of us is to make sure they're chumps.
So the party who leads by a wide margin in Quebec is the Bloc Quebecois, and most of its voters hate Trudeau for obvious reasons.
And since Pierre Poilievre is a very ''autonomy'' minded guy, only the media would REEEE if the Bloc voted with the Conservatives in a minority government. The remaining problem is the Bloc leader is easily manipulated by the media making alot of noise around him.
Anyway current voting trends would give the Conservatives a clear majority and Liberals would be decimated since most of his seats in Quebec would flip Bloc or Conservative.
Dream outcome would be Conservative majority, Bloc 40+ seats, Liberals dead third.
It might be due to the absolutely catastrophic invasion going on, but nationalist parties gained votes here. The two leading parties in Quebec election polls PQ and CAQ, score around 35% and 20% ( over 50% ), are nationalist.
Ideally Quebec would finally fuck-off Canada so the two linguistic groups have to stop pretending to function together ( it never worked. The bigger group swallows the smaller one, resistance = endless strife, and resist we will. ). Left to negociate would be the future of the Acadian part of New-Brunswick contiguous to Quebec.
The libs enshrined permanent bilingualism in the New-Brunswick constitution. You can also wait it out ( Acadians assimilate at 15%+ per generation, which will accelerate exponentially the more they shrink ).
P.S. : To give you an idea of how successfull the media brainwashing about Orange Man being Bad in Quebec, 70% of the population here is unhappy about Trump winning (... or would only dare answer that when asked ). Personally I know Trump winning will end-up having a positive impact on our economy medium and long term. Cheap energy will push costs down. Nationalist policies is good for local development. Last time Trump ran your country, we ended-up benefiting too.
Quebec had some of the harshest covid restrictions of the entire world, under the CAQ leadership. Certainly nowhere near as bad as Australia, but they were planning on building covid gulags, just like them. The only reason they refrained was because of the trucker convoy in Ottawa, and the discussions of doing the same thing to the parliament in Quebec City. People voted for the CAQ in order to have more Right-leaning leadership, to have fewer taxes and overall to be left alone, and François Legault went and fucked over all of his people with tyrannical and nonsensical rules based on the flimsiest of evidence. Just like with Trudeau, I'm also flabbergasted that he managed to win an election after his horrible mismanagement of the "pandemic".
The covid years have proven that expecting the majority of people to exert the most basic of logical scrutiny over media and government claims, was already asking for far too much. My faith in humanity had never been lower, but at least Trump's election is helping to improve it a bit.
A ''comfortable majority'' supported the government's lockdowns here, similar to how the New-Zealand electorate did.
It was quite distressing. But it was as bad, or worse in many provinces of Canada. Saskatchewan was the least offensively retarded, with the provincial Prime Minister even half-apologizing for the passports when scrapping them first in Canada.
Here no apology, only doubling-down and claiming the lockdowns and masks ''worked'' ( neither did ).
Trudeau was worse than Legault. Except Trudeau broke quarantine laws on top of draconian mesures.
However to give you an idea of the difference between ''when asked about it'' vs ''what people do'', something like 70% of people in polls said they would still wear masks the week before the mandate was lifted. The day the mandate ended mask wearing fell to under 20%.
And thank God now I can go days without seeing one.
I have low understanding why many people who voted CAQ want to go back to the Parti Quebecois. The corruption in the CAQ started quickly after they got elected ( blatantly incestuous friendships with ''Trudeau-level'' ethics codes violations between economic ministers and companies that benefit from their policies ). Yet people voted for them again in large majority.
Lockdowns didn't seem to bother most people ( those who were bothered voted Conservative Party of Quebec and didn't win one seat ). Corruption seemed to bother people very little for 2 mandates while it was a growing problem. So why the drop.
I can only assume it's because people who witnessed the CAQ being totally powerless to pressure Trudeau into securing the border want to add the threat of independance to pressure further. ( I want independance, but most Quebecois rather suck Federal transfer money and complain. Embarassing. )
I was more referring to francophone voting blocs outside of Quebec around Ottawa, in Northern Ontario and New Brunswick.
Regional populations that will always support the Liberals because they vote as a bloc for gibs towards their parallel francophone institutions.
But even 22% support for Trudeau & the federal Liberals in Quebec is pretty close to my original spitball and still way too entrenched after a decade of faggotry.
There's many mob-level things going wrong here I'm not even sure where to begin.
When the proclamation came up for consideration, McQuaker was heard to say in a recording of the meeting, “There’s no flag being flown for the other side of the coin … there’s no flags being flown for the straight people.”
As Human Rights Tribunal vice-chair Karen Dawson wrote in her decision, “I find this remark was demeaning and disparaging of the LGBTQ2 community of which Borderland Pride is a member and therefore constituted discrimination under the Code.”
Pure sadistic bullying by the so-called "human rights commission" which is itself committing human rights violations.
The Human Rights Tribunal ultimately ordered the Township to pay $10,000 to Borderland Pride, *and for McQuaker to personally pay them another $5,000".
Seriously, it's a mob protection racket. In what world can you target government employees personal bank accounts for not voting how you want them to?
In a statement to Dougall Media at the time, Borderland Pride director Douglas Judson outlined his intention to continue imposing “consequences” on anyone else who attacked them.“As a lawyer who does this work that means I’m going to start taking people’s houses and their vehicles and their toys and draining their bank accounts and garnishing their wages because no one is going to stop behaving this way until there are real consequences,” he said.
no one is going to stop behaving this way until there are real consequences
Indeed. Faggoty lawyers will continue behaving this way until someone introduces them to real, physical consequences. As they continue to ruin people's lives for not celebrating their perversions, it will inevitably happen.
They talk openly about destroying our lives and property. Why can’t we talk openly about destroying theirs? Order of events matters. They threatened us first. We have a god-given right to self-defense. It isn’t a rules violation to say that someone should destroy that lawyer’s place of business and home before he can harm others.
Emo ontario has less than a thousand people. a 10k fine is more than a thousand dollars per person.
I'm sure the town could invent charges that are 3x what they got for not having a flag pole to stick a gay flag on.
Doesn't really matter what it's for. Just invent some reason that can be dropped the second the town no longer has to pay. Like say, to purchase and have installed a flag pole for the flag they don't have.
Remember, that fine isn't meant to punish the human rights or borderland pride. They (the town) just need that money to buy and install a flagpole to put the flag on they got fined for not having.
Emo ontario has less than a thousand people. a 10k fine is more than a thousand dollars per person.
My good brother, I think you got the arithmetic flipped in the rush. For a population of 1000 that would be $10 each. You'd need a population of <10 for that to be more than $1000 each.
Perverts by definition are in constant search of more victims. They are inherently and inextricably predatory, and this is a perfect example.
These predators aren't just after kids either. They're trolling for your bank account too, so they can buy more poppers and afford more STD treatment.
This kind of thing is why I say human rights are a punchline.
Literally three paragraphs above this one:
They do not punish, they just fine when you do not do what they want when they want in the way they want.
Using the Human Rights Code for "consequences", not "punishment"! Very different! Not petty or vindictive at all! Thank you for the clarification Borderland Pride director Douglas Judson.
What is the terrible human rights violation they're totally not punishing, you might ask?
Literal fucking Karens. I swear to god, allowing women into the judiciary was even worse than their universal suffrage. Most women's idea of fairness hinges entirely on subjective popularity rather than any form of principles or objectivity.
They are, indeed, fucking insane. You're not even allowed to point-out their hypocrisy and double-standarts.
There's nothing demeaning about that. They are literally applying a bureaucratic equal standard. They would be told: "If you have a Catholic flag up, you'll need to make sure you're not excluding a Muslim flag". They know that already, so he's literally just saying, "if I need to abide by the law, I need to find a straight flag. Does anyone know where I can find them?"
Canada has it written in their dogshit Charter of Rights & Freedoms that it is perfectly legal to discriminate against whites, males and the old stock majority.
They all (SJW lawyers) talk like this. The job of the rest of us is to make sure they're chumps.
Whenever the trannies cry about how right-wingers just want to wipe them out, I have to regularly stop myself from saying "Well, not at first..."
It's a state religion.
At least that "Legal Weed" and "Not Harper" is paying off right Canada?
I still find it unbelievable that this twat has been Prime Minister for this long.
There's still 25% of the country that still would re-elect Trudeau despite the decade of abuse.
Though there's a not-insignficant portion of francophones doing identity politics in there.
There is a very large portion of national identity politics among Quebec French speakers, but it's not backing Trudeau anymore. ''We'' want him out.
The Bloc Quebecois scores at 35%, Federal Conservatives 24%, and Federal Liberals are at 22% in the last poll asking about Federal elections in Quebec.
So the party who leads by a wide margin in Quebec is the Bloc Quebecois, and most of its voters hate Trudeau for obvious reasons.
And since Pierre Poilievre is a very ''autonomy'' minded guy, only the media would REEEE if the Bloc voted with the Conservatives in a minority government. The remaining problem is the Bloc leader is easily manipulated by the media making alot of noise around him.
Anyway current voting trends would give the Conservatives a clear majority and Liberals would be decimated since most of his seats in Quebec would flip Bloc or Conservative.
Dream outcome would be Conservative majority, Bloc 40+ seats, Liberals dead third.
It might be due to the absolutely catastrophic invasion going on, but nationalist parties gained votes here. The two leading parties in Quebec election polls PQ and CAQ, score around 35% and 20% ( over 50% ), are nationalist.
Ideally Quebec would finally fuck-off Canada so the two linguistic groups have to stop pretending to function together ( it never worked. The bigger group swallows the smaller one, resistance = endless strife, and resist we will. ). Left to negociate would be the future of the Acadian part of New-Brunswick contiguous to Quebec.
The libs enshrined permanent bilingualism in the New-Brunswick constitution. You can also wait it out ( Acadians assimilate at 15%+ per generation, which will accelerate exponentially the more they shrink ).
P.S. : To give you an idea of how successfull the media brainwashing about Orange Man being Bad in Quebec, 70% of the population here is unhappy about Trump winning (... or would only dare answer that when asked ). Personally I know Trump winning will end-up having a positive impact on our economy medium and long term. Cheap energy will push costs down. Nationalist policies is good for local development. Last time Trump ran your country, we ended-up benefiting too.
Quebec had some of the harshest covid restrictions of the entire world, under the CAQ leadership. Certainly nowhere near as bad as Australia, but they were planning on building covid gulags, just like them. The only reason they refrained was because of the trucker convoy in Ottawa, and the discussions of doing the same thing to the parliament in Quebec City. People voted for the CAQ in order to have more Right-leaning leadership, to have fewer taxes and overall to be left alone, and François Legault went and fucked over all of his people with tyrannical and nonsensical rules based on the flimsiest of evidence. Just like with Trudeau, I'm also flabbergasted that he managed to win an election after his horrible mismanagement of the "pandemic".
The covid years have proven that expecting the majority of people to exert the most basic of logical scrutiny over media and government claims, was already asking for far too much. My faith in humanity had never been lower, but at least Trump's election is helping to improve it a bit.
A ''comfortable majority'' supported the government's lockdowns here, similar to how the New-Zealand electorate did.
It was quite distressing. But it was as bad, or worse in many provinces of Canada. Saskatchewan was the least offensively retarded, with the provincial Prime Minister even half-apologizing for the passports when scrapping them first in Canada.
Here no apology, only doubling-down and claiming the lockdowns and masks ''worked'' ( neither did ).
Trudeau was worse than Legault. Except Trudeau broke quarantine laws on top of draconian mesures.
However to give you an idea of the difference between ''when asked about it'' vs ''what people do'', something like 70% of people in polls said they would still wear masks the week before the mandate was lifted. The day the mandate ended mask wearing fell to under 20%.
And thank God now I can go days without seeing one.
I have low understanding why many people who voted CAQ want to go back to the Parti Quebecois. The corruption in the CAQ started quickly after they got elected ( blatantly incestuous friendships with ''Trudeau-level'' ethics codes violations between economic ministers and companies that benefit from their policies ). Yet people voted for them again in large majority.
Lockdowns didn't seem to bother most people ( those who were bothered voted Conservative Party of Quebec and didn't win one seat ). Corruption seemed to bother people very little for 2 mandates while it was a growing problem. So why the drop.
I can only assume it's because people who witnessed the CAQ being totally powerless to pressure Trudeau into securing the border want to add the threat of independance to pressure further. ( I want independance, but most Quebecois rather suck Federal transfer money and complain. Embarassing. )
I was more referring to francophone voting blocs outside of Quebec around Ottawa, in Northern Ontario and New Brunswick.
Regional populations that will always support the Liberals because they vote as a bloc for gibs towards their parallel francophone institutions.
But even 22% support for Trudeau & the federal Liberals in Quebec is pretty close to my original spitball and still way too entrenched after a decade of faggotry.
State-enforced homosexuality. Just like the conspiracy theorists said would happen.
There's many mob-level things going wrong here I'm not even sure where to begin.
Pure sadistic bullying by the so-called "human rights commission" which is itself committing human rights violations.
Seriously, it's a mob protection racket. In what world can you target government employees personal bank accounts for not voting how you want them to?
Unbelievable. Mafia-level stuff.
Indeed. Faggoty lawyers will continue behaving this way until someone introduces them to real, physical consequences. As they continue to ruin people's lives for not celebrating their perversions, it will inevitably happen.
They talk openly about destroying our lives and property. Why can’t we talk openly about destroying theirs? Order of events matters. They threatened us first. We have a god-given right to self-defense. It isn’t a rules violation to say that someone should destroy that lawyer’s place of business and home before he can harm others.
And appealing all the way to the Canadian Supreme Court is likely a waste of time since Trudeau packed it with Diversity Hires.
Went real quick from ''there is no gay agenda, they just want to be left alone'' to ''fly our flag or be fined $15 000''.
Quebec's kangoroo court of ''human rights'' persecuted Mike Ward for making jokes about a public figure child celebrity.
Because ''muh dignity of handicapped children''.
That same court was later found-out to be packed with pedos.
These courts need to be dismantled and its judges and proponents investigated.
This is a little dramatic I know, but that faggot flag is almost at the level of the mark of the beast.
Emo ontario has less than a thousand people. a 10k fine is more than a thousand dollars per person.
I'm sure the town could invent charges that are 3x what they got for not having a flag pole to stick a gay flag on.
Doesn't really matter what it's for. Just invent some reason that can be dropped the second the town no longer has to pay. Like say, to purchase and have installed a flag pole for the flag they don't have.
Remember, that fine isn't meant to punish the human rights or borderland pride. They (the town) just need that money to buy and install a flagpole to put the flag on they got fined for not having.
My good brother, I think you got the arithmetic flipped in the rush. For a population of 1000 that would be $10 each. You'd need a population of <10 for that to be more than $1000 each.
I used leftist math. It was backward intentionally when you thought about it like a normal person.
But yes. I fucked up. :)
Rule 2 violation.