Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

58
Camel Harris ad: vote or you don't get pussy (cdn.videy.co)
posted 1 year ago by rattleS 1 year ago by rattleS +58 / -0
43 comments share
43 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (43)
sorted by:
▲ 33 ▼
– Kienan 33 points 1 year ago +33 / -0

This isn't even the first ad like this, targeting black men. Again, it's a really bad sign - for her - that she needs to target black men at all.

Moreover, what's the message here? Vote for me, or you can't date...black women?!

Your terms are...acceptable. *Gleefully pulls "Trump" lever.*

EDIT: Found the other ad. Same actors, different scene/ad. Also, if you take it at face value...it just looks like women are dumb and shouldn't be allowed to vote in the first place.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– BandageBandolier 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

They couldn't even get a properly attractive black woman, they got a mid basic and gave her a personality that will leave most black guys thinking "Sooo... Not voting might help me dodge bullets from psycho bitches? Alright."

Ain't no man sad to see her leave like that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

They can never see from other than their own eyes. I mean the wammin that created this. And then of course the Koomallah campaign isn't going to assign proper men for this job.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Adamrises 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

.it just looks like women are dumb and shouldn't be allowed to vote in the first place.

Literally every statistic and study on voting shows that women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Like, they are the primary demographic that puts "attractiveness" as a huge factor in someone being elected. Which is a huge reason for the famous "radio listeners think Nixon won" bit, because JFK was super attractive compared to sickly Nixon and the fucking words they were saying meant nothing next to that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– 1776ReasonsWhy 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

The channel 'Nerdrotic' has a podcast every weekish with an asian lady named 'X-Ray Girl," and she gets blasted every now and again when Canada comes up (her home country) because she voted for Trudeau because he was "handsome." It is truly a plague.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MegoThor 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

“Yes, but what about abortion?”

-Women Voters Everywhere Always

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Gizortnik 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

You know what will make a black man vote for a "black" woman? An angry, frustrated, intolerant, entitled black woman getting pissed off at him.

Name one time this has ever backfired.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Normal people: “oh you didn’t vote? Why is that? Did you not like the candidates?”

Women: “up and rudely leaves without saying a word”

Imagine if the dude did that, she’d be on r/datingadvice getting pats on the back from faggots and other retarded women validating her stupidity

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They've been sending texts and running ads trying to attack people who don't vote.

I like people who don't vote.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

To bad, thanks to Elon, sex robots can be here in 3 months if we put our mind to it.

Sure they lack all the comfort of a woman but come with one great feature, a mute button that doesn't result in legal issues. /s

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Gizortnik 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Genuinely: Sex Bots may be banned if it ever gets put into production because so many low-quality women will loose 100% of their status, that most women will come out and demand it be criminalized.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– RoulerBleu 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Some argued the same about pornography ( and violent videogames ). The fact is although those have their own problems, none of them cause an increase in rape or violence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Gizortnik 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

One of the strangest and most alarming things I saw was someone did make a kind of Robo-Slut, but it was really more like an advanced fleshlight. The creators of the device said they put out several, uh, into the consumer space, for testing purposes to see how the device would fare.

Each device came back nearly destroyed.

Now, to be clear, this was effectively a large robotic fleshlight. Most of it was made of steel and electronics, only with a soft outer skin for, uh, use.

However, in no more than 2 weeks, most of the devices were nearly physically destroyed and no longer able to operate normally. Some were almost torn to pieces. This came back as a surprise to the engineers in that it was clear the devices needed to withstand far more abuse than they expected, but some did chime up with a legit question of: "Exactly how violent is a human male capable of being during intercourse?" Which lead to other questions around, "How violent is sex among the general population?", "How much danger are women actually in during intercourse?", "Is this what it looks like if men treat women as objects?"

From a dispassionate psychological perspective, I actually think a better question is "How much are men tempering themselves with women?" because it seems like their behavior can go to extremes when they are interacting with something that is an inanimate object. It's very obvious that most men always temper themselves, or hold themselves back, around women for status, for the safety of those women, for many reasons that indicate a fundamental psychological difference between the sexes. But when it's not women, and they're not holding themselves back, their behavior seems to be much more extreme. Women seem to be a moderator of men's behavior in almost all forms.

I guess, to your point about "increasing violence against women", I think that would definitely be a line of argumentation if this evidence continued to emerge with an actual Sex Bot; but it would be a wrong headed belief. Yes, if men see something as an object they will treat it worse than a woman; but in the opposite direction, men will personify objects as feminine and treat them much better.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– rattleS [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

From a dispassionate psychological perspective, I actually think a better question is "How much are men tempering themselves with women?

If you are talking about modern women, I tamper myself so I don't go to jail.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Kienan 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Man, I get the appeal, but I think it's the last thing society needs. Well, unless you view it as part of a natural cycle of complete society breakdown. And, I mean, someone is going to do it; it's pretty much inevitable.

It's a shame we can't seem to learn from sci-fi.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– ernsithe 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

And this is why I kept telling him to prioritize the catgirl genetic engineering over the robots. But nooooo, "catgirls can't breath on Mars either," he says. That's not the point Elon.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kienan 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

100% 1000%.

Catgirls > Robosluts. Not even close.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ernsithe 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

How do you feel about the compromise: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRvf00NooN8&t=1464s

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Gizortnik 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Robosluts catgirls are still robosluts with cat ears. Obviously.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Listen, we use the sex bots so when we're outside we have the constant post sex clarity so that means we have less gooners and simps.

With men no longer as easily led astray by women tempting us with sex, we can ignore the rejects of the left and the thots and they will naturally fade away while stocks for cat products go up.

We may have a few gooners trapped in the basement unable to not have sex with the robot but it is a sacrifice I'm willing to make especially since I won't hear about it, they're trapped in their caves. /s

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kienan 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Listen, we use the sex bots so when we're outside we have the constant post sex clarity so that means we have less gooners and simps.

I mean, you could make similar arguments for porn. Hasn't worked out that way.

Simping is a force of nature, and will likely never get stopped. Sex robots will just increase that, and also further drive down births and such. Complete breakdown.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Well unless you want me to start turning gooners and simps into eniuchs, what's your solution?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Kienan 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Look, we're in agreement that sex robots will happen. I just don't think it's a good thing, is all. I don't have a solution, as it's a complicated issue, but sex robots certainly aren't the solution, is my point.

I won't try to stop you from having your sexbot though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Nah I'm on the dog-girl train, it's close to cat-girl research but easier to train, more loyal and more likely to make you happy. /s

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– kagetsuki23 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Wolf Girl better.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– kagetsuki23 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

We should just create a fusion of the VR tech of Matrix and the AI tech of Westworld, and keep the AIs in their VR world so they won't go Terminator.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– misogynegro 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

You can't dox who someone voted for, but you can dox whether they voted at all. So they're really threatening non-voters from groups that normally vote Dem but might sit this one out with ostracizing and harassment.

Lovely people.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Hairless sheboon. Lucky dude just dodged a bullet

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Gizortnik 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

God, we really are running against nagging feminist harpies trying to shame everyone into liking them.

Vance really did hit the nail on the head with his crazy cat ladies comment. I mean basically dropped a bomb on the Feminist Fuhrer Bunker and they've been shitting themselves ever since.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

The white feather campaign was an effort to shame men into signing up for serving in a worthless banker war and getting blown up or gassed for no good reason.

Compared to that, this is as mild as menthol salsa.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Adamrises 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Harris just keeps going on shows with and talking to the most unlikable cunts, and then a lot of the time the conversation is centered around how they need to appeal to men because she is losing them hard.

In what world has "two women talk about what attracts men" ever yielded productive anything?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Gizortnik 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

"Men need to shut up and get out of the way" seems to also be the primary conclusion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– blyat56 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Well lucky for you guys, I care enough about the future of this country to make the sacrifice of not dating bitchy black women with lesbian hair.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ParadigmShift2070 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

that's a rule 16 violation!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Well, fucking is how Kamala got to where she is, so ...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RoulerBleu 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Just another less direct way Kamala uses sex to advance her political career. /s

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Women Make an Argument that Doesn't Involve Their Vagina Challenge: Impossible.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy