Every single person is different. Doesn't mean standards shouldn't be applied. It's the action that should be judged as punishable anyway, not the actor.
Homicide by man or homicide by woman, should those be treated differently just because men are different than women? Or is the unprovoked killing of a person wrong regardless of who does the killing? Similarly, is statutory rape wrong regardless of who does the raping since the crux of the issue is the inability of minors to give consent? That doesn't change whether the offender's a man or woman.
But hell, maybe women should get longer sentences than men for the same crimes because they live 10% longer.
Society pretends women are equal to men so let's give them equality. Equal rights and equal lefts. When society accepts men and women are different then I'll treat men and women differently.
She's doing this for the power she has over the kids. It's fucked up and deserves to be called out. The whole position of power she has over someone makes this especially fucked up. Doesn't matter that the kid was 17, what you gonna do? Say no to your teacher? Who's to say? Now, imagine the reverse, 20something male teacher and a 17 year old pupil would be called rape instantly and rightfully so.
Doesn't matter that the kid was 17, what you gonna do? Say no to your teacher?
Pervasive gender bias not withstanding, unironically yes. It's trivially easy to ignore your teachers in highschool, I saw kids ignoring legitimate uses of authority constantly for no reason at all other than they could and the teachers now are even bigger pushovers than back then. The incredibly favorable process of reporting inappropriate conduct because of the hair trigger they have for avoiding scandals like this will outweigh even the pro-female biases in education.
Coercion isn't the big concern in that age range, it's manipulation.
If a teacher is willing to break the law to sleep with a kid, they probably aren't willing to follow procedure and other rules in terms of not punishing that kid in every way possible for rejecting them. Double that for women, because they aren't used to rejection period.
Something regular teachers who get bullied by students wouldn't be willing to do. Like planting things in your desk or knocking your grades on a test down.
Even if they aren't going to do that, a teenager is the exact type of inexperienced and naive type to believe such a thing would happen and factor it into their answer. The same way that even a normal dude asking out his secretary might not have any ill intents but because he could punish her for it, the law often considers it abuse of power because she had reason to think he might if she said no.
"Power imbalances," as gay as feminists have made them sound, aren't usually about the explicit words and actions. But about the theoretical possibilities and if the "victim" has good reason to believe them possible.
Well yes. Paedophilia carries a stigma and rightfully so. It shouldn't matter if the perp is a man or a woman. She might find this offensive and kryptonite to her but as an adult, you have responsibility and accountability for your actions.
Also, you know the title of that article would not say "having sex with" if it was a male perp.
What’s even worse on these kinds of articles is all the men going “lucky kid, why couldn’t it ever have been me”. Idiots like that make it hard to effectively fight back against these cases of sexual abuse.
The same way men who've never been in a fight think they are the toughest fuckers around, men who never got much sex as a teen always think they'd be the ones who blew her mind and walked out of it a walking stud rather than an emotionally and mentally crippled mess.
Andrew Anglin is obsessed with these cases. He has posted them for many, many years. The women in these cases tend to be married or in a "relationship" with healthy dudes, usually tradesmen of some kind making good money. And they are usually preying on pre teen guys around the 13 year old range, although they can both be older (as in this case) or younger. The female teachers are usually sort of attractive to actually pretty hot, quite frequently former party girls. Oh, and to the macho men complaining about how the boys were totally asking for it they also prey on girls from time to time.
Edit: Also, there are occasions where they prey on special needs kids.
Hot female teachers subconsciously insert themselves into the female pecking order. They naturally compare and rank themselves among the female high school students, and this regresses those teachers socially and mentally. They typically target boys at the top of the male high school hierarchy - the quarterback, the drug dealer, etc.
Nah dude. I used to believe that too. But after years of reading Anglin I have noticed a different pattern from that boomer/ Gen X meme. The guys are usually just starting to develop sexually, their balls usually haven't dropped yet. 13 is the average age. The chicks are in their late 20s all the way to menopausal. The women are fucking boys they have control over, and sending 13 year old girl level texts to them. Funny thing is Anglin picks up on this, raging at the women in most of the cases and wondering what is wrong with them. Then he gets the one case that matches expectations and he immediately calms back down again, oblivious to his earlier cognitive dissonance.
One gal was married to a 6 and 1/2 ft tall construction manager. The man had chin that could split diamonds, was lean and athletic, was making six figures, and had to have a dick more than six inches considering his size. He had to lean down to put his chin on his hot blonde wife's forehead. She was fucking two, I shit you not, autistic YouTube minecrafters. 13 and 14 years old. Autistic YouTube minecrafters. Hot fucking blonde with a Chad of a husband.
Another party blonde openly bragged about fucking only 13 and 14-year-old boys. Another got caught treating the special needs class as her personal harem. And another, married for years with a former high school football athlete husband and had multiple kids with him, preyed exclusively on 11 year old girls.
The red pill/ Game bros and old Manosphere was wrong. They aren't going after super alpha males. They aren't fucking the best men available. They aren't producing an entire generation of Henry Cavilles and Tom Brady's. They are fucking what they have power over, chasing after Justin Bieber level "masculinity" and producing nothing but deeply androgenous/ effeminate boys.
Maybe the old red pill bros didn't factor in birth control and how it affected female psyche. Maybe all the drugs, obesity, propaganda, Til Tok, etc has altered women. Maybe having absolute power for so long has warped them and turned them into something that doesn't even remotely resemble their ancestors. Maybe the social theory that women only chase alpha males when times are tough and chase ever increasing degeneracy/ effeminacy when times get plentiful is correct. Maybe there is a lot more freak and deviant women than we all originally realized, they just hid themselves a lot better than their male counterparts for a long time. But for whatever reason, they were wrong.
She has since set up a charity called Next Chapter Scotland, which aims to “help anyone who has been involved with the criminal justice system to navigate the stigma and discrimination that they can face throughout their lives”.
aaannnddd there it is... the reason for the article...
Because I ain't subscribing to read from this shitty news site, most important question:
How old was the student?
Regardless of age, she should be stricken off because she can't do the bare minimum of keeping private and professional life seperate around those she has authority over.
The age just increases the amount of punishment depending on how low it goes..
If she is going to cross ethical lines to fuck a 17 year old student, how do we know she won't do something lesser like accept bribes to alter grades?
Males should get the same result but you have a lot more leaning on the rape conviction side even when it's a 17 year old with no force used and is more an ethical issue than criminal compared to cases like this.
In the UK for those in a position of trust such as teaching (as this woman was), the age of consent rises to 18 for those you are trusted with. She is a criminal in the eyes of the law.
Thanks hate these media sites being so subscription heavy to read more than a paragraph.
Also just noting this here, you can see the bias when she's getting all these 'flattering' photos in the article and you know the male equivalent would be mugshot galore.
Well, come on guys, this just isn't fair. If she'd known having sex with her 17-year-old student would have consequences she wouldn't have done it. Well, she probably still would, but at least she would have been more careful about it. We all know he wanted it, right? What 17-year-old doesn't want to bang his hot teacher? He's a guy, so it's totally fine, am I right, bros?
Cases like this are rarely "teacher is just unable to resist ultra Chad and his mega hotness." Its about them finding someone who is vulnerable in all the right ways that play into whatever delusions they are feeding, and the kid not recognizing a lot of the signs she is giving him. Which leads her to make them more direct and explicit, until its actually fucking.
So it didn't happen because you weren't a needy, pathetic simp as a teenager. At least not one for your teachers.
This. Exactly this. A good chunk of the time the chicks will offer the kids drugs, alcohol or even both.
The same thing happens in prison. The lady prison guards are choosing inmates they have control over. The men with pride and dignity refuse to play their games so they move on to men they can control.
Her quotes don't really reflect "complaining" so much as a sober recognition of how much it affected her life. Nothing she said there seems to indicate that she believes it is undeserved, just difficult to handle.
Just remember, no double standards, female pedos get the chipper like male pedos.
Because unfortunately even us men REALLY underplay the damage female on male rape can do, especially to a mind going through puberty.
This would imply that men and women aren’t different. They are.
Every single person is different. Doesn't mean standards shouldn't be applied. It's the action that should be judged as punishable anyway, not the actor.
Homicide by man or homicide by woman, should those be treated differently just because men are different than women? Or is the unprovoked killing of a person wrong regardless of who does the killing? Similarly, is statutory rape wrong regardless of who does the raping since the crux of the issue is the inability of minors to give consent? That doesn't change whether the offender's a man or woman.
But hell, maybe women should get longer sentences than men for the same crimes because they live 10% longer.
Society pretends women are equal to men so let's give them equality. Equal rights and equal lefts. When society accepts men and women are different then I'll treat men and women differently.
You literally just posted youd pounce on two "cute" little 5 y/o's "when they hit puberty" because they were dancing, you sick twisted gross retard.
Listen partner, shits whack, cut it out.
Honestly do you fucktard feds really think you can find a MAGA diddler you seriously are smoking your own shit.
She's doing this for the power she has over the kids. It's fucked up and deserves to be called out. The whole position of power she has over someone makes this especially fucked up. Doesn't matter that the kid was 17, what you gonna do? Say no to your teacher? Who's to say? Now, imagine the reverse, 20something male teacher and a 17 year old pupil would be called rape instantly and rightfully so.
Pervasive gender bias not withstanding, unironically yes. It's trivially easy to ignore your teachers in highschool, I saw kids ignoring legitimate uses of authority constantly for no reason at all other than they could and the teachers now are even bigger pushovers than back then. The incredibly favorable process of reporting inappropriate conduct because of the hair trigger they have for avoiding scandals like this will outweigh even the pro-female biases in education.
Coercion isn't the big concern in that age range, it's manipulation.
If a teacher is willing to break the law to sleep with a kid, they probably aren't willing to follow procedure and other rules in terms of not punishing that kid in every way possible for rejecting them. Double that for women, because they aren't used to rejection period.
Something regular teachers who get bullied by students wouldn't be willing to do. Like planting things in your desk or knocking your grades on a test down.
Even if they aren't going to do that, a teenager is the exact type of inexperienced and naive type to believe such a thing would happen and factor it into their answer. The same way that even a normal dude asking out his secretary might not have any ill intents but because he could punish her for it, the law often considers it abuse of power because she had reason to think he might if she said no.
"Power imbalances," as gay as feminists have made them sound, aren't usually about the explicit words and actions. But about the theoretical possibilities and if the "victim" has good reason to believe them possible.
That is the downest case of bad and she just wouldn't quit.
Well yes. Paedophilia carries a stigma and rightfully so. It shouldn't matter if the perp is a man or a woman. She might find this offensive and kryptonite to her but as an adult, you have responsibility and accountability for your actions.
Also, you know the title of that article would not say "having sex with" if it was a male perp.
What’s even worse on these kinds of articles is all the men going “lucky kid, why couldn’t it ever have been me”. Idiots like that make it hard to effectively fight back against these cases of sexual abuse.
Yeah, and those coombrain tards are even on this site.
The same way men who've never been in a fight think they are the toughest fuckers around, men who never got much sex as a teen always think they'd be the ones who blew her mind and walked out of it a walking stud rather than an emotionally and mentally crippled mess.
And the few that don't, they are just the weirdos, haha
Andrew Anglin is obsessed with these cases. He has posted them for many, many years. The women in these cases tend to be married or in a "relationship" with healthy dudes, usually tradesmen of some kind making good money. And they are usually preying on pre teen guys around the 13 year old range, although they can both be older (as in this case) or younger. The female teachers are usually sort of attractive to actually pretty hot, quite frequently former party girls. Oh, and to the macho men complaining about how the boys were totally asking for it they also prey on girls from time to time.
Edit: Also, there are occasions where they prey on special needs kids.
Hot female teachers subconsciously insert themselves into the female pecking order. They naturally compare and rank themselves among the female high school students, and this regresses those teachers socially and mentally. They typically target boys at the top of the male high school hierarchy - the quarterback, the drug dealer, etc.
Nah dude. I used to believe that too. But after years of reading Anglin I have noticed a different pattern from that boomer/ Gen X meme. The guys are usually just starting to develop sexually, their balls usually haven't dropped yet. 13 is the average age. The chicks are in their late 20s all the way to menopausal. The women are fucking boys they have control over, and sending 13 year old girl level texts to them. Funny thing is Anglin picks up on this, raging at the women in most of the cases and wondering what is wrong with them. Then he gets the one case that matches expectations and he immediately calms back down again, oblivious to his earlier cognitive dissonance.
One gal was married to a 6 and 1/2 ft tall construction manager. The man had chin that could split diamonds, was lean and athletic, was making six figures, and had to have a dick more than six inches considering his size. He had to lean down to put his chin on his hot blonde wife's forehead. She was fucking two, I shit you not, autistic YouTube minecrafters. 13 and 14 years old. Autistic YouTube minecrafters. Hot fucking blonde with a Chad of a husband.
Another party blonde openly bragged about fucking only 13 and 14-year-old boys. Another got caught treating the special needs class as her personal harem. And another, married for years with a former high school football athlete husband and had multiple kids with him, preyed exclusively on 11 year old girls.
The red pill/ Game bros and old Manosphere was wrong. They aren't going after super alpha males. They aren't fucking the best men available. They aren't producing an entire generation of Henry Cavilles and Tom Brady's. They are fucking what they have power over, chasing after Justin Bieber level "masculinity" and producing nothing but deeply androgenous/ effeminate boys.
Maybe the old red pill bros didn't factor in birth control and how it affected female psyche. Maybe all the drugs, obesity, propaganda, Til Tok, etc has altered women. Maybe having absolute power for so long has warped them and turned them into something that doesn't even remotely resemble their ancestors. Maybe the social theory that women only chase alpha males when times are tough and chase ever increasing degeneracy/ effeminacy when times get plentiful is correct. Maybe there is a lot more freak and deviant women than we all originally realized, they just hid themselves a lot better than their male counterparts for a long time. But for whatever reason, they were wrong.
Least shocking thing I've heard about Anglin
aaannnddd there it is... the reason for the article...
Because obviously the media wants to push for a charity that makes the predators look like victims of the justice system. They are evil.
nothing new under the sun...
Because I ain't subscribing to read from this shitty news site, most important question:
How old was the student?
Regardless of age, she should be stricken off because she can't do the bare minimum of keeping private and professional life seperate around those she has authority over.
The age just increases the amount of punishment depending on how low it goes..
Student was 17 years old
So get struck off from teaching for life, fair punishment.
Teaching of minors anyway. And naturally I expect male teachers convicted of the same crime to get the same fair punishment.
Should be all to be honest.
If she is going to cross ethical lines to fuck a 17 year old student, how do we know she won't do something lesser like accept bribes to alter grades?
Males should get the same result but you have a lot more leaning on the rape conviction side even when it's a 17 year old with no force used and is more an ethical issue than criminal compared to cases like this.
For the record, 16 is the age of consent in Canada, unless you hold a position of trust over them.
17
here: https://archive.ph/n4VW7
In the UK for those in a position of trust such as teaching (as this woman was), the age of consent rises to 18 for those you are trusted with. She is a criminal in the eyes of the law.
ah, thank you. I was answering the question, but without that context, the judge's statement sounds...sketchy...
Thanks hate these media sites being so subscription heavy to read more than a paragraph.
Also just noting this here, you can see the bias when she's getting all these 'flattering' photos in the article and you know the male equivalent would be mugshot galore.
not a problem, I too have an overflowing email inbox, lmao.
Well, come on guys, this just isn't fair. If she'd known having sex with her 17-year-old student would have consequences she wouldn't have done it. Well, she probably still would, but at least she would have been more careful about it. We all know he wanted it, right? What 17-year-old doesn't want to bang his hot teacher? He's a guy, so it's totally fine, am I right, bros?
And yet here you are, willingly giving an interview to the media...
Typical woman. The only thing worse than negative attention is not enough attention.
archive link for anyone who doesn't want to sign up for a "free" account..
A 17 and 26 year old isn't the best example of these issues even if they are right like asking why a married women's going after a teenager.
“Had it not been for the fact that you were this young man’s teacher, there would have been no criminality.”
I really wanna see the reverse and the media defending this. It would never happen.
Starting to question if something is wrong with me, because no hot teachers ever wanted to fuck me while i was in gradeschool..
More like something is right with you.
Cases like this are rarely "teacher is just unable to resist ultra Chad and his mega hotness." Its about them finding someone who is vulnerable in all the right ways that play into whatever delusions they are feeding, and the kid not recognizing a lot of the signs she is giving him. Which leads her to make them more direct and explicit, until its actually fucking.
So it didn't happen because you weren't a needy, pathetic simp as a teenager. At least not one for your teachers.
I was a skinny quiet kid who wanted to be riding my bike or running around in the woods. Lol
INDEPENDENCE?
Yeah that shit is anathema to pedo teachers.
LOL
This. Exactly this. A good chunk of the time the chicks will offer the kids drugs, alcohol or even both.
The same thing happens in prison. The lady prison guards are choosing inmates they have control over. The men with pride and dignity refuse to play their games so they move on to men they can control.
That's not necessarily true. For all you know they all wanted to, they didn't act on it
lol, maybe i should find them online, "miss x, did you ever wanna do me when i was in youre 7th grade class?"
Might make life less boring Barty boy.
LOL theyd be like 70 now, no thanks, im good.
They could have "kept it tight"
I prefer sex not smell like a retirement home.
I love the smell of Ben Gay, toffee candy, and tuna
:(
The stigma is that she can get away with it without being in a wooden box and buried (while still being alive.)
In another article the convicted registered sex offender complains about "not being invited to my daughter’s friends’ birthday parties."
🤡🤡🤡🤡
She keeps her maiden name and does an interview. Sounds like she revels in being a child molester.
Imagine if the sexes were reversed . . .
Her quotes don't really reflect "complaining" so much as a sober recognition of how much it affected her life. Nothing she said there seems to indicate that she believes it is undeserved, just difficult to handle.
...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vP6hWsLaYCIq