Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

127
Federal agents rebuffed while trying to question man about social media posts (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by AntonioOfVenice 1 year ago by AntonioOfVenice +127 / -0
35 comments share
35 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (35)
sorted by:
▲ 52 ▼
– Hullohoomans 52 points 1 year ago +52 / -0

If a federal agent ever refuses to identify themselves, you should call your sheriff and tell them you have people impersonating an officer of the law and trying to shake you down.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 36 ▼
– FourteenEightyFour 36 points 1 year ago +36 / -0

i saw a video of local police come and handcuff a fed that was snooping about some guys guns, exactly that scenario

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– deleted 26 points 1 year ago +26 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– Wizardslayer 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

Years back mobsters would do this on the regular because the Feds always refused to cooperate with local law enforcement thinking they were corrupt. The Feds would post up outside mob joints, a mobster would call the cops and be like "There are guys with guns in a car outside my cafe." Local cops would roll up and pull the Feds out of the car and toss them while the mobsters would all be laughing on the sidewalk.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Gizortnik 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

This is two armed gunman refusing to leave a property and being trespassed.

"You see our badges" as he taps it is not even close to enough for a sufficient form of identification. Real FBI agents have fucking ID's. Not a "boob inspector" badge they bought off of Amazon, don't show you, and carry next to their gun.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– I_Bent_My_Wookiee 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

And let the sheriff know that they are armed.
Nipple-head had a firearm behind his badge. You can see it when he turns towards the SUV.
Not sure if discount third-Krassenstein Brother is armed as well. He seemed too weak to carry.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 47 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 47 points 1 year ago +47 / -0

You need to treat ALL federal agents that act this way like this as otherwise if they feel emboldened, you end up with them acting like UK cops that drag an autistic girl away because she said you looked like her lesbian nan..

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

Later on, that same agent was wildly pepperspraying people for no reason.

No consequences.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 32 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 32 points 1 year ago +32 / -0

DON'T.

TALK.

to FEDS.

anything you say or do can be held against you in this kangaroo court of law. As soon as they refuse to give identification and failed to show any kind of warrant, he should have told them to fuck off and gone back inside.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– Kienan 31 points 1 year ago +31 / -0

DON'T. TALK. to FEDS.

But, if you do...be sure to call them faggots.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 22 points 1 year ago +22 / -0

and hide your dog

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Guy_Incognito76 20 points 1 year ago +20 / -0

Even if they do show id's, even if they have a warrant, even if they arrest you. Shut the fuck up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

make them think you're a non-psychic Pokemon called 'Lawyer'

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– CanuckElhead 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

Those overpaid Pinkerton's deserve worse.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Mpetey123 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

I hate to be that guy but I really don't think this is real.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– freedomlogic 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

I dont know. Seems legit to me.

Would it really surprise you? Man, I never really understood what made america so special, until I moved to a shit hole crown country like kanada.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/31/23004339/uk-twitter-user-sentenced-grossly-offensive-tweet-tom-moore-joseph-kelly

Kelly was found guilty in February last year and faced possible jail time. His case brought attention to an often-criticized piece of UK legislation that allows social media users to be prosecuted for sending “grossly offensive” messages.

As reported by The National, Kelly was sentenced on Wednesday. His defense argued that Kelly had few followers on Twitter at the time; that he had been drinking before writing the post; and that he deleted the tweet just 20 minutes after sending it.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/09/two-men-jailed-for-social-media-posts-that-stirred-up-far-right-violence

Parlour’s post said: “Every man and their dog should be smashing [the] fuck out [of] Britannia hotel.” More than 200 refugees and asylum seekers lived at the hotel. The initial post received six likes, but could be forwarded more widely owing to Parlour’s privacy settings.

Welcome to the new normal.

Now, I used to try not say anything to offensive. I definitely dont incite violence, or advocate to do illegal things.

But holy FUCK. I am fucking SALTY, about what nova scotia did to me. Get poisoned at a place called ARCA Canada. Get denied medical help, have a doctor lie about a medicaiton I was never given. Have wcb and the college of physciians try to paint me as im just imagining everything.

Society IS FUCKING BROKEN. IT HAS BROKEN DOWN.

Ill even spare you that for the last 4 fucking years ive suffered from low phosphorous either from kidney damage from being poisoned by arca, or its cancer.

Ive taken a hundred blood tests. No one will do anything, these people are the biggest faggots I have ever seen and thats fucking giving a bundle of sticks a bad fucking name.

May these people rot in the FIRES OF ETERNAL HELL.

Now that I know they are trying to pass this stupid hate legislation through in canada, i will call people retards, i will call them faggots, because thats exactly what they are, especially the people who work for daddy government doing whatever their master bids them to do.

They already have laws in place, and now they want more and a "tribunal" who is going to police all this shit and preemptively fine and jail people. Fucking Orwellian.

Our ancestors fought hard to make america what it is, and now instead of being ruled by churches and the crown, were owned by people like bill gates and jeff bezos.

This world deserves to be purged imo.

edit(bill im talking about)

https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2024/02/first-take-on-the-online-harms-act/

Second, there are at least three big red flags in the bill. The first involves the definitions for harms such as inciting violence, hatred, and bullying. As someone who comes from a community that has faced relentless antisemitism and real threats in recent months, I think we need some measures to combat online harms. However, the definitions are not without risks that they may be interpreted in an over broad manner and have implications for freedom of expression. Second – related to the first – is the incredible power vested in the Digital Safety Commission, which will have primary responsibility for enforcing the law. The breadth of powers is remarkable: rulings on making content inaccessible, investigation powers, hearings that under certain circumstances can be closed to the public, establishing regulations and codes of conduct, and the power to levy penalties up to 6% of global revenues of services caught by the law. There is an awful lot there and questions about Commission oversight and accountability will be essential. Third, the provisions involving the Criminal Code and Canadian Human Rights Act require careful study as they feature penalties that go as high as life in prison and open the door to a tidal wave of hate speech related complaints.

Get fucked trudeaus gestapo.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

The first involves the definitions for harms such as inciting violence, hatred, and bullying. As someone who comes from a community that has faced relentless antisemitism and real threats in recent months, I think we need some measures to combat online harms. However, the definitions are not without risks that they may be interpreted in an over broad manner and have implications for freedom of expression.

"Pls don't let someone use this against me."

Second – related to the first – is the incredible power vested in the Digital Safety Commission, which will have primary responsibility for enforcing the law. The breadth of powers is remarkable: rulings on making content inaccessible, investigation powers, hearings that under certain circumstances can be closed to the public, establishing regulations and codes of conduct, and the power to levy penalties up to 6% of global revenues of services caught by the law. There is an awful lot there and questions about Commission oversight and accountability will be essential.

"Pls don't let someone use this against me."

Third, the provisions involving the Criminal Code and Canadian Human Rights Act require careful study as they feature penalties that go as high as life in prison and open the door to a tidal wave of hate speech related complaints.

"Pls don't let someone use this against me."

tl;dr "Pls don't let someone use this against me."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Mpetey123 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

No it wouldn't surprise me if it's real. My initial reaction is it seems staged. It's not a big hill, and I'm not interested in dying on it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

I'm not entirely sure, I think it is. Some people say that the license plate isn't one for feds. But they did act like other plain-clothes FBI agents I've seen. They're polite and a bit timid.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– GloboHomoErectus 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Feds rent or lease cars all the time because it's not traceable back to them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mpetey123 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

How's that possible you have to provide everything shy of a blood test to rent a car? Rentals are the easiest thing in the world to track

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– CatoTheElder 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

The feds aren't trying to hide from feds. They are trying to hide from the peasants, who cannot deliver a warrant to the rental company demanding the information.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Mpetey123 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Yeah if they were on official business you'd figure they'd have a government vehicle. I guess it could be a rental car. And the plaid is a bit odd. And I couldn't tell you why exactly it screams weird to me but why park right in front of the house, and then walk across the street. If the filmer wanted to catch the feds why not record the moment they show up?

I dunno it could be I've seen too much reddit and "Inception" but it just doesn't scream sincerity to me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Kienan 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Rental cars are totally possible. Plaid just looks like basic dress shirts.

The walking across the street and then back, right as the video starts is a bit weird though, I'll definitely give you that.

We've seen this sort of thing before, though, and it's well within the FBI wheelhouse. I'm assuming it's real for now. But do wonder what they were doing across the street. Possibly trying to talk to a neighbor or something.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mpetey123 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Maybe with more context, like what did the guy post?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Kienan 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

if your kid calls you a faggot and you write an article about it, the kid was probably right

And the FBI took that personally. Kidding, kidding. Although that one is a banger too.

Some people are theorizing it was:

People are acting like Trump's reaction is so impressive but if someone shot at Joe Biden he wouldn't even flinch

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Ender910 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Could be just about anything almost, although one of the most recent things I can find that might get some feathers ruffled was his post about the average IQ of Haitians from 7 days ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PooperSnooperPrime 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

May have been looking through the windows of the citizens car, which brought his attention to their presence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Unknownsailor 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Don't talk to them at all, say "I don't talk to oath breakers" and leave it at that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– FourteenEightyFour 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

such a satisfying watch, but also scary and ever-eye opening

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MagnumLife 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Well said that man.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– bloodguard 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Names, badge numbers and warrant or I'm calling the Sheriff who loves humbling feckless feds. Especially if they're dressed in effete Mom jeans.

Truth be told I'm calling the Sheriff regardless. Just to watch them get in the SoccorMom-mobile and peddle away at full speed.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LinkR 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Am I having a hallucination? I feel like I saw this same video years ago.... Like, I remember seeing a vid at least very much like this with two dudes in civie attire going to somebody's house.... It played out exactly the same way.

Anyone else?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I've seen something like this before, and obviously with the guy telling the agents off or he wouldn't have posted it, but not his exact same scenario.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Universally, they try to get people to stop filming them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy