that article
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Most of a decade ago, in the midst of GG at its peak, Kotaku and many others posted a bunch of thirst articles about how hot Ryu was in the newest Street Fighter. This was usually sandwiched between articles crying about women's suffering.
Degeneracy will always be promoted, normalcy will always be hated. That's the simple way to remember this.
Openly horny women is degeneracy (both in polite society and their own minds, you can debate if you agree), gay is degenerate, bear/mindflayer sex is super degenerate. So its always a wonderful thing and they love it. Hot women is normal and so it must be torn down.
At least Bear/Druid - Mindflayer sex is consensual. These bitches are always into rape fantasies because they have an insatiable hunger for any kind of masculinity (including unhealthy kinds), which is why they are so into fetishizing The Handmaid's Tale, 50 Shades of Gray, and Andrew Cuomo (ye old "Cuomosexuals")
Mindflayer sex doesn't exist! Illithid reproduce by eating the brains of other sentients whilst implanting their tadpoles into the brains of yet more other sentients! When a mindflayer is old enough its brain gets removed and put into a large paddling pool where it then spawns the aforementioned tadpoles, there is no sex at any stage of this lifecycle, only mind rape and mind eating!
Based mindflayer scholar
This bugged the hell out of me in BG3.
You're not being inventive enough. If there are tentacles involved, then there can be sex.
Considering the backlash against DDLG or teen porn, and I suppose lolicon in general, there is a collective movement that "the trappings you wear make it illegal because what you are portraying cannot consent." Meaning that it is in fact uncouth and illegal for druids to become bears for sex, as bears cannot consent period. I don't make up these standards, I just like enforcing them.
The funny thing is women fantasize about monsterous, nightmarish creatures. Men fantasize about sexy or cute cat girls hehehe.
Women are simultaneously empowered and victims at any given moment.
Funny. Sexy outfit or.. even a conservatively clothed female with a pretty face and hourglass figure with big boobs or butt is considered "go watch porn".
But literal hardcore porn in tlou2 or baldurs gate is fine and dandy.
I bet if all those first descendant chars have some kinda disability or vitiligo or gayness.. itll be promoted like baldurs gate. First descendant aint ground breaking and its an okay game. But at least it is a niche game for a particular segment of gamers and its not losing money. Diversity of games is way more important than diversity in games. Only diversity in games i want are boob and ass sizes.
"Dragon Age 3 gets sex right"
"I murdered innocent refugees to support the Goblins, and for my blood lust, I was rewarded with sex from the crazy dark-elf that serves an evil God. But, I also have an insane hunger for murder so I broke her spine and killed her too. Weird that her murder got me off more than her vagina could have..."
I don't think they understand how sex works.
Being rewarded with sex for being a blood thirsty murderer? Seems pretty realistic to me.
I think we cracked the code on who's sending those love letters to serial killers and mass shooters.
If they didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards..
Meanwhile for us gamers, sort of related but came across this video using AI to improve Concord's character design. We're equal in that we want our guys dapper and our women hot.
Remember how much they raged at this comment?
"If sex with a druid in wild shape is not bestiality, then sex with a druid in child shape is not pedophilia."
Because they know it doesn't work both ways. And that makes them uncomfortable.
it begs repeating, these "people" cannot aesthetically appreciate human bodies, and perceive them only as means to masturbate with
Wtf...
coomerism doesn't become okay just because some retards online say it's bad (while behind closed doors they fund it by the billions so you can get addicted to it and fuck up your brain)
Riddle me this. Why they "fund it behind closed doors" when they could openly promote it? Didn't they do it during the mid-2000's? Remember all the gamer gurls ads?
fine, let me rephrase:
when the libtards say coomerism is bad because it "objectifies women" they are LYING to you. they LIE to you for personal gain. they LIE to you to confuse you. they are LYING when they say they dont want you lusting over pixels. by lusting over pixels you are making the libtards very happy, because they have succeeded in TRICKING you.
If they wanted us lusting over pixels, why would they go to such great pains to make all of the female pixels ass-ugly?
It's because their goal is to push degeneracy everywhere in order to erode the pillars propping up western civilization. They mean to rule over the ashes after they bring it all down. Monogamous heterosexual relationships are one of those pillars, so anything that might appeal to heterosexual gamers (i.e. men) is verboten.
They don't want you lusting over pixels (hot vidya and anime women), they want you lusting over pixels (OF thots) and pixels (repulsive degenerate fetish shit).
Hot vidya and anime women are today's version of pin-up girls, you're not supposed to goon over them, but rather have them in the background of environments where male bonding occurs. They tell you to go masturbate because you're only supposed to appreciate a woman's beauty in the most detached, carnal, and yet also cuckolded manner (jerking it to another man banging a woman you're attracted to).
Male bonding over appreciating beautiful women bad, that might lead to men getting together to help each other get girlfriends. Can't have that. You're only allowed to be a cuckold (coomer), a fag, or someone with such a severe fetish that you're not even interested in real sex anymore, just weird disgusting shit like piss and scat or furries and vore etc.
Sexual liberalism is about centering sexual selection while eliminating natural selection, and men wanna spread their genes, but that also means men wanna help other men within their extended kinship network spread their genes too. Women have this instinct as well, they love being matchmakers for their friends, and the troon stuff subverts the ability of women to take up their traditional role as the social glue operating in the background.
My point being that whether they realize it or not, leftists are, to borrow hunger grandpa's terminology, building the "superstructure" of progressive sexual moralizing around the "base" of sexual capitalism. In the long run human sexuality will be managed by giant corporate pimps, as "sex work" is legalized and Tinder and such give women the opportunity to make some cash on the side in exchange for dipping down into the bottom 80%. The line between hookups and hooking will be blurred deliberately, every woman will be at least a potential prostitute, because the "yes model" of consent makes all sex into an explicit hedonic exchange at best.
I would think for this to be profitable, they'd have to ban sexual/pornographic art too, right? Given all the Red Pill/Manosphere stuff and more men not falling for the current-year shit or sex market, I don't think they'd play along. Or I assume this requires mass social engineering and breeding men who'd push back out of existence. Some dystopia...
Invasions, infiltrations, corruptions, propaganda, and genocides happen in stages. You don't jump to the end stage, or the frogs jump out of the pot. The initial advertising of sex in media was to get men hooked on porn. It worked. Now that men are hooked on porn (which is freely available all over the internet), they've shifted mainstream media to demoralization and normalization of ugliness. This is what the Soviets did to demoralize their people through architecture (brutalism).
Boom. there are steps. It's a process. That's why the narrative always shifts on any given "controversial" issue.
For example: There is no inflation
Okay, there is inflation but it's minimal
Okay, the inflation isn't minimal but it's temporary (the word they used was transitory)
Okay, the inflation isn't temporary but inflation is actually a good thing
And finally....
Okay, inflation isnt a good thing, but it's actually Trump's fault.
They don't jump straight to blaming Trump because no one would believe it (yet). They need to be slowly led to that conclusion via a series of lies and gaslighting. So they start with a small lie and gradually grow it.
So they lie about attacking things het men would find attractive to TRICK!!!1 them into liking those things they like anyway? Damn it, that's some nasty 5d chess
We got some real fucking Columbos on here, watch out Illuminati.
No one is lusting over pixels unless they are a) 13yo or b) surrounded by such a disastrous set of members of the opposite sex, that fucking pixels appear as a preferable alternative.
Its not hard: people just like having peak looking men and women to look at. Because its just nice to look at. Nicer than the blobs we have to deal with in real life, anyway. And maybe something we could aspire to become(those of the same sex as ourselves, presumably, but hey, you do you), if only we could get rid of all those responsibilities that tend to clog onto enery average human over 25(yeah, thats never going to happen lol. and thats ok.).
Exactly like people prefer listening to music instead of perlin noise, or worse, recordings of insults targeted at them(which is the sound equivalent of leftist character design).
So the modern dating scene?
Pretty much. Nothing more fun than a date with a 6/10 that has the entitlement, cock count, and attitude of a 10/10 celebrity a generation ago.
i mean, for all the intelligence you claim here, they've still managed to get you to tolerate and accept autogynephilia under the guise of "individual freedom". if they can get you to shrug your shoulders at that they can absolutely figure out how to get you hooked on pixels while making you think that shoving cameras up girl's asses wearing skintight latex is "beauty".
the Sistine Chapel is beauty. the Venus de Milo is beauty. posts about how they gave the character in Stellar Blade a cameltoe, how 2B's ass has the most polygons ever that you can zoom in on, or how much the breasts in Dead or Alive bounce around are pornography, and Al Goldstein rubs his hands in glee from beyond the grave each time.
You're half right.
They do want you looking at porn, but only for it's degeneracy
They want women to be objectified but not by the viewer, only by themselves.
They don't want hot chicks in games because they know the reason they were put into games in the first place was male gamers and male game developers objectifying women, not women objectifying themselves.
Which is why they're against hot chicks in games, but not against similar looking real life women going on only fans.
They want you having sex, but not procreating because sex is about lust and not about creating life. If you do get pregnant, they want you to abort it. If you don't abort it they want you to abandon it (at daycare, preschool, school) as many days as possible for as many hours as possible for as many years as possible.
Everything the left pushes is an inversion of whatever is natural or good. If they are pushing it, it's the worst extreme of bad, unnatural, or both.