that article
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
coomerism doesn't become okay just because some retards online say it's bad (while behind closed doors they fund it by the billions so you can get addicted to it and fuck up your brain)
Riddle me this. Why they "fund it behind closed doors" when they could openly promote it? Didn't they do it during the mid-2000's? Remember all the gamer gurls ads?
fine, let me rephrase:
when the libtards say coomerism is bad because it "objectifies women" they are LYING to you. they LIE to you for personal gain. they LIE to you to confuse you. they are LYING when they say they dont want you lusting over pixels. by lusting over pixels you are making the libtards very happy, because they have succeeded in TRICKING you.
If they wanted us lusting over pixels, why would they go to such great pains to make all of the female pixels ass-ugly?
It's because their goal is to push degeneracy everywhere in order to erode the pillars propping up western civilization. They mean to rule over the ashes after they bring it all down. Monogamous heterosexual relationships are one of those pillars, so anything that might appeal to heterosexual gamers (i.e. men) is verboten.
They don't want you lusting over pixels (hot vidya and anime women), they want you lusting over pixels (OF thots) and pixels (repulsive degenerate fetish shit).
Hot vidya and anime women are today's version of pin-up girls, you're not supposed to goon over them, but rather have them in the background of environments where male bonding occurs. They tell you to go masturbate because you're only supposed to appreciate a woman's beauty in the most detached, carnal, and yet also cuckolded manner (jerking it to another man banging a woman you're attracted to).
Male bonding over appreciating beautiful women bad, that might lead to men getting together to help each other get girlfriends. Can't have that. You're only allowed to be a cuckold (coomer), a fag, or someone with such a severe fetish that you're not even interested in real sex anymore, just weird disgusting shit like piss and scat or furries and vore etc.
Sexual liberalism is about centering sexual selection while eliminating natural selection, and men wanna spread their genes, but that also means men wanna help other men within their extended kinship network spread their genes too. Women have this instinct as well, they love being matchmakers for their friends, and the troon stuff subverts the ability of women to take up their traditional role as the social glue operating in the background.
My point being that whether they realize it or not, leftists are, to borrow hunger grandpa's terminology, building the "superstructure" of progressive sexual moralizing around the "base" of sexual capitalism. In the long run human sexuality will be managed by giant corporate pimps, as "sex work" is legalized and Tinder and such give women the opportunity to make some cash on the side in exchange for dipping down into the bottom 80%. The line between hookups and hooking will be blurred deliberately, every woman will be at least a potential prostitute, because the "yes model" of consent makes all sex into an explicit hedonic exchange at best.
Invasions, infiltrations, corruptions, propaganda, and genocides happen in stages. You don't jump to the end stage, or the frogs jump out of the pot. The initial advertising of sex in media was to get men hooked on porn. It worked. Now that men are hooked on porn (which is freely available all over the internet), they've shifted mainstream media to demoralization and normalization of ugliness. This is what the Soviets did to demoralize their people through architecture (brutalism).
So they lie about attacking things het men would find attractive to TRICK!!!1 them into liking those things they like anyway? Damn it, that's some nasty 5d chess
We got some real fucking Columbos on here, watch out Illuminati.
No one is lusting over pixels unless they are a) 13yo or b) surrounded by such a disastrous set of members of the opposite sex, that fucking pixels appear as a preferable alternative.
Its not hard: people just like having peak looking men and women to look at. Because its just nice to look at. Nicer than the blobs we have to deal with in real life, anyway. And maybe something we could aspire to become(those of the same sex as ourselves, presumably, but hey, you do you), if only we could get rid of all those responsibilities that tend to clog onto enery average human over 25(yeah, thats never going to happen lol. and thats ok.).
Exactly like people prefer listening to music instead of perlin noise, or worse, recordings of insults targeted at them(which is the sound equivalent of leftist character design).
So the modern dating scene?
i mean, for all the intelligence you claim here, they've still managed to get you to tolerate and accept autogynephilia under the guise of "individual freedom". if they can get you to shrug your shoulders at that they can absolutely figure out how to get you hooked on pixels while making you think that shoving cameras up girl's asses wearing skintight latex is "beauty".
the Sistine Chapel is beauty. the Venus de Milo is beauty. posts about how they gave the character in Stellar Blade a cameltoe, how 2B's ass has the most polygons ever that you can zoom in on, or how much the breasts in Dead or Alive bounce around are pornography, and Al Goldstein rubs his hands in glee from beyond the grave each time.
You're half right.
They do want you looking at porn, but only for it's degeneracy
They want women to be objectified but not by the viewer, only by themselves.
They don't want hot chicks in games because they know the reason they were put into games in the first place was male gamers and male game developers objectifying women, not women objectifying themselves.
Which is why they're against hot chicks in games, but not against similar looking real life women going on only fans.
They want you having sex, but not procreating because sex is about lust and not about creating life. If you do get pregnant, they want you to abort it. If you don't abort it they want you to abandon it (at daycare, preschool, school) as many days as possible for as many hours as possible for as many years as possible.
Everything the left pushes is an inversion of whatever is natural or good. If they are pushing it, it's the worst extreme of bad, unnatural, or both.