They still need to get sued for breaking and entering at the very least. So what if they're immune to it; make it go through the courts and keep the light on those cockroaches.
The third amendment is interpreted in a strict manner regarding who it considers soldiers, and most precedent I could find shows it to be the military and national guard. Mitchell v. City of Henderson holds that police don't count as they're not soldiers, and I'd bet other kinds of agents wouldn't count either for similar reasons.
The third amendment is interpreted however the SC interprets it. There isn't enough case law on violations to confidently say that it doesn't apply here. I certainly wouldn't be betting that it doesn't apply.
Even if there was some sort of exigent circumstance that made them believe they had the right to enter (which there isn't in this case), there's still no legitimate purpose to concealing their actions in this way.
"We hold these relationships in the highest regard and our personnel would not enter, or instruct our partners to enter, a business without the owner’s permission."
Except you did. You got a caught on camera doing it, and you've admitted to doing it. So either you're lying, or you just admitted that you have absolutely no control over your employees.
No matter how much you hate law enforcement, you don't hate them enough.
pretty sure that only applies when executing your duties as a police officer, or in this case as a secret service agent. as far as I'm aware, the salon was not under investigation, there was no warrant, and breaking in was not a matter of security for their client.
The funny thing is they probably could have just asked and been allowed to. If I had to guess it's a raging leftist that would be happy to let them.
They are the highest powers of the government though, that would be far too respectful, they take what they want and fuck you for having a problem with it. If it wasn't in media, they would have told her to fuck off.
I'm beginning to think this is all just part of a plan to make the Secret Service seem extremely fallible and incompetent, after decades of propaganda to the opposite, to get more and more unhinged Lefties willing to try their luck.
Because the Deep State has been panicking since last October when not everyone fell in line to Defend Israel, so hoping to just get their opposition killed like that doesn't seem out of their wild playbook.
And of course they'd have the competent and surgical agents saved for themselves. Ol' Obama and his cronies don't have the dumpy women agents on their team.
It's not even that. They don't actually need us to pay taxes. They can (and do) print all the money they need. We're just serfs. They just want the power to control us.
It's no more complicated than this: telling people what to do gets their dicks hard. It bugs them to see people deciding what to do and when to do it, what to eat, what to say and think. They just want control.
because they are above the law apparently.
B-b-but no one is above the law in Our Democracy™!
I guess thugs are not under the third amendment, haha
What's the thing Biden likes to say, No right is absolute.
They apologized extremely quickly. They couldn't even do that for their shoddy performance protecting President Trump on July 13.
They still need to get sued for breaking and entering at the very least. So what if they're immune to it; make it go through the courts and keep the light on those cockroaches.
They aren't immune to the third amendment though. The owner has a case, if she wants to push it.
The third amendment is interpreted in a strict manner regarding who it considers soldiers, and most precedent I could find shows it to be the military and national guard. Mitchell v. City of Henderson holds that police don't count as they're not soldiers, and I'd bet other kinds of agents wouldn't count either for similar reasons.
The third amendment is interpreted however the SC interprets it. There isn't enough case law on violations to confidently say that it doesn't apply here. I certainly wouldn't be betting that it doesn't apply.
It's definitely against the 4th Amendment
The fuck they don't. That needs to be fixed.
B&E? This is fucking Bill of Rights level violations!
Even if there was some sort of exigent circumstance that made them believe they had the right to enter (which there isn't in this case), there's still no legitimate purpose to concealing their actions in this way.
Except you did. You got a caught on camera doing it, and you've admitted to doing it. So either you're lying, or you just admitted that you have absolutely no control over your employees.
No matter how much you hate law enforcement, you don't hate them enough.
The fact that Secret Service agents apparently carry tape with them at all times suggests covering cameras is standard operating procedure for them.
Good point. They also picked the lock. I'd love to hear their excuse for needing to regularly carry a lock picking kit with them.
how about a charge for fucking breaking and entering, as well as vandalism?
Qualified Immunity is fun.
pretty sure that only applies when executing your duties as a police officer, or in this case as a secret service agent. as far as I'm aware, the salon was not under investigation, there was no warrant, and breaking in was not a matter of security for their client.
They were on duty at the time. I'm not a lawyer so maybe they'll get charged and QI will be denied
The funny thing is they probably could have just asked and been allowed to. If I had to guess it's a raging leftist that would be happy to let them.
They are the highest powers of the government though, that would be far too respectful, they take what they want and fuck you for having a problem with it. If it wasn't in media, they would have told her to fuck off.
She said she would have let them in. She closed her store because of the rally nonsense.
Did Biden have a "poopy" moment?
No this was Harris' detail, probably trying to stop her shitting in the street
How dare they disrespect her culture!
As with most recent blatant unlawfulness, no deterrent and no consequence.
Welcome to the uniparty Kleptocracy:
I'm beginning to think this is all just part of a plan to make the Secret Service seem extremely fallible and incompetent, after decades of propaganda to the opposite, to get more and more unhinged Lefties willing to try their luck.
Because the Deep State has been panicking since last October when not everyone fell in line to Defend Israel, so hoping to just get their opposition killed like that doesn't seem out of their wild playbook.
And of course they'd have the competent and surgical agents saved for themselves. Ol' Obama and his cronies don't have the dumpy women agents on their team.
Israel took the Baby Hitler thought exercise too literally and think they can assassinate their way out of another holocaust.
At least they took the pile of crap with them when they left.
It's not even that. They don't actually need us to pay taxes. They can (and do) print all the money they need. We're just serfs. They just want the power to control us.
It's no more complicated than this: telling people what to do gets their dicks hard. It bugs them to see people deciding what to do and when to do it, what to eat, what to say and think. They just want control.