The third amendment is interpreted in a strict manner regarding who it considers soldiers, and most precedent I could find shows it to be the military and national guard. Mitchell v. City of Henderson holds that police don't count as they're not soldiers, and I'd bet other kinds of agents wouldn't count either for similar reasons.
The third amendment is interpreted however the SC interprets it. There isn't enough case law on violations to confidently say that it doesn't apply here. I certainly wouldn't be betting that it doesn't apply.
They aren't immune to the third amendment though. The owner has a case, if she wants to push it.
The third amendment is interpreted in a strict manner regarding who it considers soldiers, and most precedent I could find shows it to be the military and national guard. Mitchell v. City of Henderson holds that police don't count as they're not soldiers, and I'd bet other kinds of agents wouldn't count either for similar reasons.
The third amendment is interpreted however the SC interprets it. There isn't enough case law on violations to confidently say that it doesn't apply here. I certainly wouldn't be betting that it doesn't apply.
It's definitely against the 4th Amendment
The fuck they don't. That needs to be fixed.