White people have allowed themselves to be battered to a point we have no in-group preference. Everyone else does. Black jurists admitted that OJ was guilty that he murdered two people but they let him go because of skin color. A white person would never defend a white person just because they are white.
This isn't true. The same much-touted study that showed White liberals as having a negative racial in group bias also showed White conservatives as having a positive one. I've also seen polls that show White Trump voters are more concerned about racism against Whites than racism against non-Whites.
What we lack is a viable public presence to express it because of institutional capture.
ETA: Tommy Robinson is a great example of how Whites get suppressed, actually. He is paid by Zionist to replace pro-White activists after they have been crushed by the system (i.e. Sam Melia). He plays the pied piper role and leads Whites to express our racial interests in ways that are only in service to Zionism and therefore ineffective.
One of Tommy Robinson's Canadian tour organizers exposed that the day after he landed he bought drugs from an Indian restauranteur, then disappeared on a coke-fueled The Hangover style binge while frequenting Montreal "massage parlours" while admitting he was about to have his own arrest staged after his next show.
I try to remind people of that at every opportunity. When a black person commits a heinous crime, all blacks everywhere claim he dindu nuffin, and the system is racist. White people look at white criminals and say fry the fucker, because we know criminals are bad for society as a whole. And this is why black cities always will be shitholes. They can't comprehend that the reason they're shitholes is because they refuse to hold their own accountable, whether it's murderers or politicians. Accountability is white supremacy, or something.
Actually people call him a shill because he's zionist and doesn't have a problem with immigrants as long as they aren't muslim. Which means he's not actually against immigrants . He's defended pajeet immigrants for example
Actually people call him a shill because he's zionist and doesn't have a problem with immigrants as long as they aren't muslim. Which means he's not actually against immigrants
Right….which makes him a zionist, pushing for whites to act like muslims, while still flooding the west with mass migration. Which loops back to “shill” lol
Of course it can. We're not mental children, we can grasp simple multi-contextual concepts.
Being an unthinking racial blob can be bad in the context of having a society of free and vibrant individualism. But also good in the context of living in a society where the systemic guards of individualism have already been crushed and unthinking racial blobs of a different flavor have invaded and are looking to force you into second class citizenship in the country your grandfathers built. When your only salvation is overpowering a people unified in their desire to enslave you, the coordinated strength of an unthinking racial blob might just be the right tool for the job.
Every non-white demo engages in ruthless tribalism, and every white nation and culture is in catastrophic decline. The evidence of the world around us proves you retarded.
There is nothing wrong with your statement. There are things to admire at Muslim communities while also realizing they are bad in other aspects.
I see no contradiction there.
This is one thing I hate about whites in general, they're the only group with an outside bias. I wished we had more of a community like every single other group out there.
This is one thing I hate about whites in general, they're the only group with an outside bias.
It’s not exactly “outside bias” though it can be thought of that way.
It’s our capacity for empathy.
Which is a big reason our countries aren’t fucking dogshit hellholes of overwhelming crime and suffering (compared to the rest of the world atleast)
If we lost this capacity, or trained ourselves to suppress it, I don’t see many good things resulting from that at all. I certainly don’t see it as our “only salvation” or some kind of foregone conclusion.
How about a thinking mob? Honestly, how do you see this play out? Do you think the anti-white racism, hatred and discrimination will end anytime soon?
Maybe when we are on reservations, although I doubt anyone would give us that luxury, they would have to acknowledge that we're natives in Europe.
I see no main stream movement among any large ethnic group that would even dare to say that maybe we should not demonize white people.
For all the "white privilege" we seem to have we're the only group that has no representation, no significant major party can acknowledge that maybe we should not be demonized or heaven forbid, say we need less immigration or that European culture is in any way good.
There's a fundamental misunderstanding of empathy there. Empathy is an innate and instinctual feeling. It's not something that is lost just because you don't enslave yourself to coddling that feeling 100% of the time. Disgust at unhygienic waste is also an innate and instinctual feeling that overall serves a good purpose in society, but parents must learn to temporarily suppress it to clean their children's mess and surgeons need to learn to suppress it to an even greater degree to operate. Empirically, that doesn't make parents of surgeons suddenly morph into disgusting pigs rolling in filth in the rest of their life. Learning to control your emotions and disregard unhelpful instincts for rational goals is part of becoming a healthy, productive adult. People who refuse to do so are just manchildren and liabilities only capable of living under the protective umbrella of others, not shining examples of moral character. People should aspire be higher beings standing on the foundation of their feelings, not a worm crushed under them.
It's not that empathy is bad, having an innate high empathy is good for cooperative societies and history has already proven the overall competitive edge cooperative societies gain. But it's just a crude instinct that gives false positives sometimes. Saying doing what empathy tells you to is always good is like saying shooting people is always bad. That's a path that leads to being the useless idiot trying to stop someone from shooting at someone attempting murder and saving lives. Having high empathy and an adult's emotional control and sense of responsibility is what lead to much of the world having it's first taste in centuries of someone strong enough to depose the marauding warlords not becoming the next marauding warlord. Having high empathy and a child's emotional control and sense of responsibility is what degenerated that into marauding rapists giving the west it's first taste in centuries of the visceral reality of a low trust society.
but parents must learn to temporarily suppress it to clean their children's mess and surgeons need to learn to suppress it to an even greater degree to operate.
This is an example of logical thought overpowering emotions, something I advocate and was in fact the driving motivation behind posting my original comment in this thread, if that wasn’t clear
People should aspire be higher beings standing on the foundation of their feelings, not a worm crushed under them.
Yes, precisely.
Here is some ancient wisdom:
People belong where they are born. Creatures belong where they are fed.
A logical person would realize that logic doesn’t dictate our reality. Rhetoric is infinitely more effective than dialectic. And racial politics are clearly defeating the whites who don’t practice them.
You’re a midwit. You think you’re high delusions are unassailable, but they don’t map onto our observable reality even a little bit.
Should we found an ADL for whites? Should we then use similar tactics as the ADL for similar goals? Why or why not? If you think we should, who will be our Leo Frank?
White people have allowed themselves to be battered to a point we have no in-group preference. Everyone else does. Black jurists admitted that OJ was guilty that he murdered two people but they let him go because of skin color. A white person would never defend a white person just because they are white.
This isn't true. The same much-touted study that showed White liberals as having a negative racial in group bias also showed White conservatives as having a positive one. I've also seen polls that show White Trump voters are more concerned about racism against Whites than racism against non-Whites.
What we lack is a viable public presence to express it because of institutional capture.
ETA: Tommy Robinson is a great example of how Whites get suppressed, actually. He is paid by Zionist to replace pro-White activists after they have been crushed by the system (i.e. Sam Melia). He plays the pied piper role and leads Whites to express our racial interests in ways that are only in service to Zionism and therefore ineffective.
One of Tommy Robinson's Canadian tour organizers exposed that the day after he landed he bought drugs from an Indian restauranteur, then disappeared on a coke-fueled The Hangover style binge while frequenting Montreal "massage parlours" while admitting he was about to have his own arrest staged after his next show.
That sounds about right. Ezra Levant is big on theatrical arrests.
I try to remind people of that at every opportunity. When a black person commits a heinous crime, all blacks everywhere claim he dindu nuffin, and the system is racist. White people look at white criminals and say fry the fucker, because we know criminals are bad for society as a whole. And this is why black cities always will be shitholes. They can't comprehend that the reason they're shitholes is because they refuse to hold their own accountable, whether it's murderers or politicians. Accountability is white supremacy, or something.
did he try the based pajeets he likes so much?
"We"? Does he think lawyers are white?
What is the Ummah?
What is the Ummah?
The guy who wants all Muslims gone….wants whites to act more like Muslims….
Clear why people call this guy a shill
Actually people call him a shill because he's zionist and doesn't have a problem with immigrants as long as they aren't muslim. Which means he's not actually against immigrants . He's defended pajeet immigrants for example
There’s only about 20 muslims calling for violence and the UK police are cowering inside?
https://x.com/trobinsonnewera/status/1816422239102718375
If this were anti-lockdown protesters then the police would bring out “stompy the horse” to crush the crowd.
https://youtu.be/NC63LTYCT1k
Right….which makes him a zionist, pushing for whites to act like muslims, while still flooding the west with mass migration. Which loops back to “shill” lol
i don't see how pushing for Whites to help each other is the same as "pushing for Whites to act like muslims"
Is acting as an unthinking racial blob a good thing or a bad thing? Can’t be both can it?
Of course it can. We're not mental children, we can grasp simple multi-contextual concepts.
Being an unthinking racial blob can be bad in the context of having a society of free and vibrant individualism. But also good in the context of living in a society where the systemic guards of individualism have already been crushed and unthinking racial blobs of a different flavor have invaded and are looking to force you into second class citizenship in the country your grandfathers built. When your only salvation is overpowering a people unified in their desire to enslave you, the coordinated strength of an unthinking racial blob might just be the right tool for the job.
Where has it been established that unthinking racialism is the only salvation for checks notes unthinking racialism?
Literally a straw man, I said your only salvation is fighting back. Then said racialism might be the best tool for the job
Stop being a concern troll
When there are people out there who are unthinkingly anti White then the only hope of survival for White people is to be unthinkingly pro White
Reality.
its a good thing if you are the native of the land that seeks to protect your nation
Does Tommy Robinson seek to protect his nation?
Should we have unthinkingly supported and campaigned for him because “he looks like us”?
If we had, would we be more or less like muslims?
Tommy Robinson doesn't seek to protect his nation. If he did he wouldn't be a zionist and he'd be against all immigrants not just muslims
Every non-white demo engages in ruthless tribalism, and every white nation and culture is in catastrophic decline. The evidence of the world around us proves you retarded.
There is nothing wrong with your statement. There are things to admire at Muslim communities while also realizing they are bad in other aspects.
I see no contradiction there.
This is one thing I hate about whites in general, they're the only group with an outside bias. I wished we had more of a community like every single other group out there.
It’s not exactly “outside bias” though it can be thought of that way.
It’s our capacity for empathy.
Which is a big reason our countries aren’t fucking dogshit hellholes of overwhelming crime and suffering (compared to the rest of the world atleast)
If we lost this capacity, or trained ourselves to suppress it, I don’t see many good things resulting from that at all. I certainly don’t see it as our “only salvation” or some kind of foregone conclusion.
It's not empathy that got us this outside bias is the brainwashing we got because of ww2 and slavery.
We are going to be a minority soon enoug. We see each day anti-white racism, at work, in the media, in entertainment, in adds.
When every other group is tribal why white people should not be? You're solution is to just take the abuse until we are dead?
Empathy is a luxury that we can't afford and the rest don't want.
I haven’t presented my solution but I know it doesn’t involve acting as an unthinking mob
How about a thinking mob? Honestly, how do you see this play out? Do you think the anti-white racism, hatred and discrimination will end anytime soon?
Maybe when we are on reservations, although I doubt anyone would give us that luxury, they would have to acknowledge that we're natives in Europe.
I see no main stream movement among any large ethnic group that would even dare to say that maybe we should not demonize white people.
For all the "white privilege" we seem to have we're the only group that has no representation, no significant major party can acknowledge that maybe we should not be demonized or heaven forbid, say we need less immigration or that European culture is in any way good.
A thinking mob is just about the only way forward, but that thinking mob isn’t defined by 23andMe results, but by….what they think
Stop pretending to be White
Lmfao
There's a fundamental misunderstanding of empathy there. Empathy is an innate and instinctual feeling. It's not something that is lost just because you don't enslave yourself to coddling that feeling 100% of the time. Disgust at unhygienic waste is also an innate and instinctual feeling that overall serves a good purpose in society, but parents must learn to temporarily suppress it to clean their children's mess and surgeons need to learn to suppress it to an even greater degree to operate. Empirically, that doesn't make parents of surgeons suddenly morph into disgusting pigs rolling in filth in the rest of their life. Learning to control your emotions and disregard unhelpful instincts for rational goals is part of becoming a healthy, productive adult. People who refuse to do so are just manchildren and liabilities only capable of living under the protective umbrella of others, not shining examples of moral character. People should aspire be higher beings standing on the foundation of their feelings, not a worm crushed under them.
It's not that empathy is bad, having an innate high empathy is good for cooperative societies and history has already proven the overall competitive edge cooperative societies gain. But it's just a crude instinct that gives false positives sometimes. Saying doing what empathy tells you to is always good is like saying shooting people is always bad. That's a path that leads to being the useless idiot trying to stop someone from shooting at someone attempting murder and saving lives. Having high empathy and an adult's emotional control and sense of responsibility is what lead to much of the world having it's first taste in centuries of someone strong enough to depose the marauding warlords not becoming the next marauding warlord. Having high empathy and a child's emotional control and sense of responsibility is what degenerated that into marauding rapists giving the west it's first taste in centuries of the visceral reality of a low trust society.
This is an example of logical thought overpowering emotions, something I advocate and was in fact the driving motivation behind posting my original comment in this thread, if that wasn’t clear
Yes, precisely.
Here is some ancient wisdom:
A logical person would realize that logic doesn’t dictate our reality. Rhetoric is infinitely more effective than dialectic. And racial politics are clearly defeating the whites who don’t practice them.
You’re a midwit. You think you’re high delusions are unassailable, but they don’t map onto our observable reality even a little bit.
Should we found an ADL for whites? Should we then use similar tactics as the ADL for similar goals? Why or why not? If you think we should, who will be our Leo Frank?
Are you a Jew?
Wahhhhhhh someone who doesn’t think like the herd wahhhhhhhhhhh must be a jew wahhhhhhhhhhhh
You tell me goy, what’s my post history say?
No. It's "someone is telling the herd to pay no mind to the cliques of wolves among the flock. They must be a jew."
For obvious reasons.
Please, find me saying anything fucking like that over the last 4 years.
You’d have to be fucking retarded to take my statement about TR’s hypocrisy how you just framed it
If only the paradox of tolerance came as a slapstick, your face would have a job.
What’s paradoxical about thinking a “white supremacist” is retarded for advocating whites act like non-whites?
Hitler drank water.
One absurdly reductive argument deserves another.
Does Tommy Robinson seek to protect his nation?
Should we have unthinkingly supported and campaigned for him because “he looks like us”?
If we had, would we be more or less like muslims?
>says the 18hour old sockpuppet brigader