The only evidence to the contrary we had was that he was a registered Republican, and that could easily be so he could vote in their primary to sabotage them. I'm registered as an independent myself because that allows me to pick which primary I want to vote in.
I lived in PA for a while. Pennsylvania literally invented the "register as the other party to screw up their primary" gag.
How do you think we got Doctor Fucking Oz as a Senate candidate? Because a large chunk of his voters were Ds. The state DNC openly suggested it on twitter.
Party registration literally doesn't mean a thing in PA.
Heh, you can't even vote for a general candidate in Pennsylvania. You have to vote for pledged electors, many of whom are fakes drawn up by the other party.
I read somewhere that is is a closed primary in that state, so you had to be registered as republican there if you wished to sabota... vote in their primary.
unless I completely misunderstand the system, which is quite possible.
So he WAS radicalized by extreme far-right conspiracy theorists! That is, radicalized by picking fights with the right on their turf and getting his ass completely stomped on. He didn't take it very well.
The numerator is the number of incarcerated criminals -- which they don't know because they don't know the immigration status of every criminal they collect. The denominator is the number of illegal immigrants, which, again, no one knows.
So not even for the state of Texas. No one knows exactly what the illegal incarceration rate is, much less the crime rate. They also make a point of arguing that incarceration rates parallel crime rates, but again no one can know if that is true to the same degree for illegals as for other groups. In fact, blacks serve longer sentences when they are caught for crimes, supposedly because they're back, but no one can verify that it's not because they commit worse crimes or because they "don't do themselves any favors" in court. So blacks should have relatively more incarcerated per crime committed.
blacks serve more time on average, even for the same crime, because the most effective mechanism for crime reduction was figured out in the 90s... amplifiers like 3-strikes laws.
you can't get 3-strikes in a single case for a reason. justice systems seek to give people a chance, but when someone has shown repeatedly that they disregard the law, it's usually better just to incarcerate them indefinitely. physically remove them from society, and crime falls. the incredible majority of people in jail/prison are not first time offenders.
the wokies don't want to accept that blacks are reported to commit significantly more crime than everyone else, even by other blacks. so when a black person commits more crime, and 3-strikes laws amplify the sentencing duration based on having a prior criminal record, of course they're going to get more.
blacks serve more time on average, even for the same crime, because the most effective mechanism for crime reduction was figured out in the 90s... amplifiers like 3-strikes laws.
Right. Amplifiers are what I was thinking of. The "same crime" often covers a lot of ground, and that's why judges have discretion. Blacks are more violent, so they get longer sentences. They also suck at defending themselves in court. Lawyers know.
It seems like most crimes are down-charged. I see a lot of assault charges for what clearly was armed robbery and definitely involved some kind of battery. That's easier for the prosecutor to prove. But then when it comes to sentencing, the facts are the facts.
in state court, when a plea is agreed to, the prosecutor and defense negotiate the sentence. the judge doesn't have to accept it, but 99% of the time it's rubber stamped. in state court, the down-charged crimes are usually more related to certainty of the evidence, risk in the case, political careers involved of the prosecutor, and cost to the state in actually taking it to trial. when there's no genuine issue of dispute, one side usually folds, and usually that's the defendant. prosecutor will occasionally negotiate down the charge, but usually much less than federal, because they have near total control over negotiating the sentence.
in federal court, this does not exist. the prosecutor and defense can only negotiate to what the prosecutor ADVISES the sentence should be. the judge still has full authority within federal sentencing guidelines, and the defendant is fucked if the federal judge is having a bad day. this is why in federal court, pleas are down-charged far more often... because the defense much less likely to agree to plea to a full charge that has much higher ranges on prison time, when the judge can nuke them after the fact.
Leftists don't act like that. They troll places that have conservatives in it but ONLY if they have leftists to back them up.
Him coming to gab solo just to get blown up is just... weird. I guess it's like the pajeets and leftists that come here to get proverbially slapped by us?
Possibly to observe and keep tabs on right-leaning content creators. Leftists are precisely the sorts who'd actually register for convenience-features, leaving an unnecessary digital trail in the process.
I wish you were right. Let's just say I'm seeing alot of on-the-ground shilling in Reddit that are basically solo-trolling in more right-leaning spaces, like firearms and whatnot.
Most leftists tend to stay in their echo chambers, or try to basically false flag. I see very little effort for leftists to interact with the right in right spaces.
"immigrants cause less crime" is technically true because black crime is so ridiculously high that they bring the average above immigrant crime. But immigrants still commit more crime than Whites.
The only evidence to the contrary we had was that he was a registered Republican, and that could easily be so he could vote in their primary to sabotage them. I'm registered as an independent myself because that allows me to pick which primary I want to vote in.
I lived in PA for a while. Pennsylvania literally invented the "register as the other party to screw up their primary" gag.
How do you think we got Doctor Fucking Oz as a Senate candidate? Because a large chunk of his voters were Ds. The state DNC openly suggested it on twitter.
Party registration literally doesn't mean a thing in PA.
Should just be one primary with everyone listed, the top 2-4 move on -- not ranked choice, but similar??
Heh, you can't even vote for a general candidate in Pennsylvania. You have to vote for pledged electors, many of whom are fakes drawn up by the other party.
Please understand how stupid it is to look at a problem caused by inadequate gatekeeping and think even less gatekeeping is the solution.
Fuck the parties and the l any gatekeeper -- we the people are the gate keepers and deciders of our destiny
I read somewhere that is is a closed primary in that state, so you had to be registered as republican there if you wished to sabota... vote in their primary.
unless I completely misunderstand the system, which is quite possible.
You would think that shooting at a political person would suggest which politics he doesn't, sorry, didn't like
Your mistake was thinking the left would A be honest and B manage to think in multiple steps
So he WAS radicalized by extreme far-right conspiracy theorists! That is, radicalized by picking fights with the right on their turf and getting his ass completely stomped on. He didn't take it very well.
Fucking crime rate data.
The numerator is the number of incarcerated criminals -- which they don't know because they don't know the immigration status of every criminal they collect. The denominator is the number of illegal immigrants, which, again, no one knows.
So not even for the state of Texas. No one knows exactly what the illegal incarceration rate is, much less the crime rate. They also make a point of arguing that incarceration rates parallel crime rates, but again no one can know if that is true to the same degree for illegals as for other groups. In fact, blacks serve longer sentences when they are caught for crimes, supposedly because they're back, but no one can verify that it's not because they commit worse crimes or because they "don't do themselves any favors" in court. So blacks should have relatively more incarcerated per crime committed.
This all, of course, conveniently ignores that they're all criminals for entering the country illegally.
HOW DARE YOU
No criminal is illegal!
blacks serve more time on average, even for the same crime, because the most effective mechanism for crime reduction was figured out in the 90s... amplifiers like 3-strikes laws.
you can't get 3-strikes in a single case for a reason. justice systems seek to give people a chance, but when someone has shown repeatedly that they disregard the law, it's usually better just to incarcerate them indefinitely. physically remove them from society, and crime falls. the incredible majority of people in jail/prison are not first time offenders.
the wokies don't want to accept that blacks are reported to commit significantly more crime than everyone else, even by other blacks. so when a black person commits more crime, and 3-strikes laws amplify the sentencing duration based on having a prior criminal record, of course they're going to get more.
Right. Amplifiers are what I was thinking of. The "same crime" often covers a lot of ground, and that's why judges have discretion. Blacks are more violent, so they get longer sentences. They also suck at defending themselves in court. Lawyers know.
It seems like most crimes are down-charged. I see a lot of assault charges for what clearly was armed robbery and definitely involved some kind of battery. That's easier for the prosecutor to prove. But then when it comes to sentencing, the facts are the facts.
in state court, when a plea is agreed to, the prosecutor and defense negotiate the sentence. the judge doesn't have to accept it, but 99% of the time it's rubber stamped. in state court, the down-charged crimes are usually more related to certainty of the evidence, risk in the case, political careers involved of the prosecutor, and cost to the state in actually taking it to trial. when there's no genuine issue of dispute, one side usually folds, and usually that's the defendant. prosecutor will occasionally negotiate down the charge, but usually much less than federal, because they have near total control over negotiating the sentence.
in federal court, this does not exist. the prosecutor and defense can only negotiate to what the prosecutor ADVISES the sentence should be. the judge still has full authority within federal sentencing guidelines, and the defendant is fucked if the federal judge is having a bad day. this is why in federal court, pleas are down-charged far more often... because the defense much less likely to agree to plea to a full charge that has much higher ranges on prison time, when the judge can nuke them after the fact.
Why would a Biden supporter have a fucking Gab account?
To troll and harass the Trump supporters on Gab, why is that confusing?
Gizortnik has never been an edgy kid on the internet.
This is literally the edgiest I've ever been.
Yes but you never did it as a kid so you have trouble understanding the motivation at that stage of life.
This is all true.
Leftists don't act like that. They troll places that have conservatives in it but ONLY if they have leftists to back them up.
Him coming to gab solo just to get blown up is just... weird. I guess it's like the pajeets and leftists that come here to get proverbially slapped by us?
I guess he REALLY hates us.
..like a typical Redditor.
We get occasional leftist trolls here. They mostly don't last very long.
He was there in 2021, right after Biden's fake win/inauguration, in order to gloat. Entirely consistent with demon Democrat behaviour.
Possibly to observe and keep tabs on right-leaning content creators. Leftists are precisely the sorts who'd actually register for convenience-features, leaving an unnecessary digital trail in the process.
I wish you were right. Let's just say I'm seeing alot of on-the-ground shilling in Reddit that are basically solo-trolling in more right-leaning spaces, like firearms and whatnot.
Even on win there are a few leftists trolls. We just don't see them often
Most leftists tend to stay in their echo chambers, or try to basically false flag. I see very little effort for leftists to interact with the right in right spaces.
Torba, get that info and work with the local PD to verify.
Fuck the Feds, work with local journalist outfits to FIND OUT. Why the fuck is he on gab? Gab's mostly right-populist.
Archive of the tweet
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/olFvA
There is no universe where someone pro-Soandso and also tries to assassinate Soandso live on television.
No matter how many Blue Anons want to pretend this guy was on the right.
They have totally incoherent internal belief systems, so they assume everybody else does too.
"immigrants cause less crime" is technically true because black crime is so ridiculously high that they bring the average above immigrant crime. But immigrants still commit more crime than Whites.
And also have to take into account how much the FBI "rounds up" a lot of statistics into the White category.
Duh