I don't know why the right ever thought Destiny was moderate or a "more rational leftist".
To me he is exactly like that atheist "The cosmic skeptic". If you watch debates with older atheists, there will be times where atheists will concede points because they have actual viewpoints that they're willing to say yes or no to.
With cosmic skeptic, he gets held up as a new more rational atheist because he seems like he listens more by not having a hard and fast opinion, but what he's really doing is just not standing on any point so that no point can ever be conceded while conducting himself like a "reasoned intellectual". This gives the impression of more intelligence, rationality and level-headedness, but it's really just intellectual cowardness so that the goal post can always be moved and all roads lead to "I'm right".
Destiny, I got the same sense from him. He presented like a good faith engage-r, but I noticed he too was just a weasley wormy vaush-lite that takes a position only to the extent where he doesn't have to concede anything.
I never got the sense that he was moderate, and his opinions were never intelligent. I'm not sure why the right thought he was decent.
Again, I've always seen him as Vaush-lite. Basically if Vaush cared about optics, you'd have Destiny.
The internet truly has the memory of a goldfish to think Destiny was ever rational or moderate. He's repeatedly wished death on conservatives before but apparently a satirical tone got him a pass for that. Besides that, you have admitting to straight up premeditated double murder (wanted to kill a troll and his dad, decided not to) and justifying incest.
His brand in the past has been edgy and doubling down, but guess what retards? He really is a soulless psycho. Wow. Who could have seen that coming.
The desire for a competent debate and the lack of any biden/harris supporter to fill the role. Who else could? I think Cenk is worse. Seems every good leftist has abandoned biden, or at least not come out to support him.
I know it sounds like an SJW thing to say, but you cannot have a competent debate with someone who truly holds leftist values.
I know this paints with a broad brush like reddit's "All cops are bad" or "all white people are implicitly white supremacist", but in the case of leftists it's true, for the same reason Scientologists don't engage in debates, or Mormons.
Because when a belief is completely outside of reality, the person holding that belief falls into 1 of 2 categories.
The ignorant and the blind, who when faced with countering viewpoints, would rather just shut the whole thing down with rhetoric and cognitive dissonance rather than face some uncomfortable truths. Many on the left fall into this category which is why they don't typically engage with conservatives despite us being more than willing to engage with them.
People who are not ignorant, but rather intelligently and with full knowledge embrace the ideology with all of its' radical insanity. Why they do this could be many things. Maybe there's something they think some sort of communist revolution will get them. Maybe they hate America and want to see it fall. Maybe they're anti-Christian and want an "anything goes" pagan morality to be the law of the land. There's many reasons, but everyone who falls into this category has theirs, or maybe a combination of reasons.
Someone "coming across the aisle" to have some sort of debate, does not fall into the first category. If an ideology is cultish enough, which the leftist ideology is at this point, then anyone even giving the impression of reason rather than insulation falls into option 2, and it's just a matter of how well they hide it.
Now are there exceptions that prove the rule? Very possible, but I've yet to see them.
political differences can be discussed and engaged with such as "what's the best way to fix infrastructure problems, how do we decrease the national debt, how do we get unemployment down, etc". But once a political party starts saying that men can get pregnant and that there should be drag queen story hour for children, you've left the arena of intelligence and reason and entered into the realm of a cult, and the engagement with a cult is totally different. There's no reasoning with Jim Jones adherents or the Manson family. The only thing you can do with cultists is try to shake them until they sober up and if that fails, you ban them from polite society. There's no debate or reasoning to be had with genuine cultists.
The first group is easy because they don't think linearly from principle to derive moral rules like fully actualized humans. In this way they aren't really any different than most normies. What they believe is down to chance rather than anything else. But normies can't be considered to have a self so it's by the by.
For the second group, is far more akin to an alien race. What they believe is completely logical and consistent. They start from a different value set than most of humanity however and that leads to conclusions that seem ludicrous.
Your system of language and values DOESNT HAVE ready made definitions for what they are, which is why it's a struggle to map them appropriately in your picture of the world. Like trying to plot four dimensional objects on paper, it just doesn't fit.
Reminds me of a parody commercial where a guy was soliciting advice from a so-called financial guru.
"Do you think I should put my money into the stock market right now?"
"Well if you buy stocks now now then unexpected events can cause your stock to go down over time...but if you don't then you could miss an opportunity to have your personal portfolio increase in value over time. I don't subscribe to the market being either bullish or bearish; it just has ups and downs."
Why does anyone care what this guy thinks? I think I ask this every time he gets his 15 seconds of internet clout again by saying something retarded.
But I'll just ask you guys, as I doubt he has fans here, why does it matter what he thinks or says? Why would you give anything he is doing any views or energy or time?
It almost certainly only takes a few minutes of hearing the retard talk (even about non-politics) to know you never need to waste anymore of your limited lifespan listening to him.
Because there are alot of people that agree with him.
Pushing back against him is good for multiple reasons. One, it makes clear to his followers what'll happen to them if they start spouting off their opinions in public - or, worse, making those opinions a reality by escalating to violence. If we cut people like them off here, now, we ameliorate alot of potential trouble in the future.
Two, he's a smug, sanctimonious, evil, retarded asshole who hasn't thought his own opinions through to the ultimate conclusion. ('Oh, you're saying that it's okay to murder people to achieve political aims? So... what stops people from doing the same to you?') Having him end up ruined and penniless is the nice option as to what his overall philosophy will end up at.
Because he is the intellectual leader (lol) of internet atheists. If you don't pay attention to leaders and attempt to engage with them, you risk allowing them to brainwash too many people
Because he's done an effective job until recently of coming across as the moderate voice of reason for lots of gullible normies. Anyone younger than boomers thinks the neoliberal status quo sucks, whether left or right, and he was basically the establishment's attack poodle on social media.
I saw some of that Boogie2298 cancer drama coverage and saw that Destiny was on these streams and people were acting like it was a big deal and I just don't get it.
Smart move by the parents would be to cut him off completely, contact, inheritance, etc. I know he's not likely to need the money from them but it still sends the message that if he wishes them dead, then he should be dead to them.
He's been falling off and has become a lolcow, esp after interviewing a Houthi pirate and telling him that he's "just like Luffy from One Piece." Apparently even a lot of the tards who'd previously followed him thought that was too much.
I don't know why the right ever thought Destiny was moderate or a "more rational leftist".
To me he is exactly like that atheist "The cosmic skeptic". If you watch debates with older atheists, there will be times where atheists will concede points because they have actual viewpoints that they're willing to say yes or no to.
With cosmic skeptic, he gets held up as a new more rational atheist because he seems like he listens more by not having a hard and fast opinion, but what he's really doing is just not standing on any point so that no point can ever be conceded while conducting himself like a "reasoned intellectual". This gives the impression of more intelligence, rationality and level-headedness, but it's really just intellectual cowardness so that the goal post can always be moved and all roads lead to "I'm right".
Destiny, I got the same sense from him. He presented like a good faith engage-r, but I noticed he too was just a weasley wormy vaush-lite that takes a position only to the extent where he doesn't have to concede anything.
I never got the sense that he was moderate, and his opinions were never intelligent. I'm not sure why the right thought he was decent.
Again, I've always seen him as Vaush-lite. Basically if Vaush cared about optics, you'd have Destiny.
The internet truly has the memory of a goldfish to think Destiny was ever rational or moderate. He's repeatedly wished death on conservatives before but apparently a satirical tone got him a pass for that. Besides that, you have admitting to straight up premeditated double murder (wanted to kill a troll and his dad, decided not to) and justifying incest.
His brand in the past has been edgy and doubling down, but guess what retards? He really is a soulless psycho. Wow. Who could have seen that coming.
He sucks Israel's dick so conservative pundits started rehabilitating him.
You're not wrong here, can someone explain why this is downvoted? (EDIT: this was at +1 -2 at the time)
Basically the only two things that he got right was Israel and Kyle Rittenhouse. That's basically it.
I only count one.
Especially Ben Shapiro. IIRC Ben did a big interview with him and so did Ben’s employee Jordan Peterson.
The desire for a competent debate and the lack of any biden/harris supporter to fill the role. Who else could? I think Cenk is worse. Seems every good leftist has abandoned biden, or at least not come out to support him.
I know it sounds like an SJW thing to say, but you cannot have a competent debate with someone who truly holds leftist values.
I know this paints with a broad brush like reddit's "All cops are bad" or "all white people are implicitly white supremacist", but in the case of leftists it's true, for the same reason Scientologists don't engage in debates, or Mormons.
Because when a belief is completely outside of reality, the person holding that belief falls into 1 of 2 categories.
The ignorant and the blind, who when faced with countering viewpoints, would rather just shut the whole thing down with rhetoric and cognitive dissonance rather than face some uncomfortable truths. Many on the left fall into this category which is why they don't typically engage with conservatives despite us being more than willing to engage with them.
People who are not ignorant, but rather intelligently and with full knowledge embrace the ideology with all of its' radical insanity. Why they do this could be many things. Maybe there's something they think some sort of communist revolution will get them. Maybe they hate America and want to see it fall. Maybe they're anti-Christian and want an "anything goes" pagan morality to be the law of the land. There's many reasons, but everyone who falls into this category has theirs, or maybe a combination of reasons.
Someone "coming across the aisle" to have some sort of debate, does not fall into the first category. If an ideology is cultish enough, which the leftist ideology is at this point, then anyone even giving the impression of reason rather than insulation falls into option 2, and it's just a matter of how well they hide it.
Now are there exceptions that prove the rule? Very possible, but I've yet to see them.
political differences can be discussed and engaged with such as "what's the best way to fix infrastructure problems, how do we decrease the national debt, how do we get unemployment down, etc". But once a political party starts saying that men can get pregnant and that there should be drag queen story hour for children, you've left the arena of intelligence and reason and entered into the realm of a cult, and the engagement with a cult is totally different. There's no reasoning with Jim Jones adherents or the Manson family. The only thing you can do with cultists is try to shake them until they sober up and if that fails, you ban them from polite society. There's no debate or reasoning to be had with genuine cultists.
Destiny got soundly defeated in two different pro life debates on the whatever podcast, once by Lila rose and once by Trent horn.
He's just an evil, bitter, typical atheist
You've mischaracterized the second group.
The first group is easy because they don't think linearly from principle to derive moral rules like fully actualized humans. In this way they aren't really any different than most normies. What they believe is down to chance rather than anything else. But normies can't be considered to have a self so it's by the by.
For the second group, is far more akin to an alien race. What they believe is completely logical and consistent. They start from a different value set than most of humanity however and that leads to conclusions that seem ludicrous.
Your system of language and values DOESNT HAVE ready made definitions for what they are, which is why it's a struggle to map them appropriately in your picture of the world. Like trying to plot four dimensional objects on paper, it just doesn't fit.
I’ve had some great debates with Mormons.
Reminds me of a parody commercial where a guy was soliciting advice from a so-called financial guru.
"Do you think I should put my money into the stock market right now?"
"Well if you buy stocks now now then unexpected events can cause your stock to go down over time...but if you don't then you could miss an opportunity to have your personal portfolio increase in value over time. I don't subscribe to the market being either bullish or bearish; it just has ups and downs."
"...oh."
Destiny is who gave us both Vaush and Cenk's Nephew, although the latter was too retarded to actually learn anything that cuck boy taught him.
He's in a vulnerable place right now after his wife left him for a gay vegan with woman arms.
Only Destiny could make that dude look like a Based Giga-Unit 😆
Why does anyone care what this guy thinks? I think I ask this every time he gets his 15 seconds of internet clout again by saying something retarded.
But I'll just ask you guys, as I doubt he has fans here, why does it matter what he thinks or says? Why would you give anything he is doing any views or energy or time?
It almost certainly only takes a few minutes of hearing the retard talk (even about non-politics) to know you never need to waste anymore of your limited lifespan listening to him.
Because there are alot of people that agree with him.
Pushing back against him is good for multiple reasons. One, it makes clear to his followers what'll happen to them if they start spouting off their opinions in public - or, worse, making those opinions a reality by escalating to violence. If we cut people like them off here, now, we ameliorate alot of potential trouble in the future.
Two, he's a smug, sanctimonious, evil, retarded asshole who hasn't thought his own opinions through to the ultimate conclusion. ('Oh, you're saying that it's okay to murder people to achieve political aims? So... what stops people from doing the same to you?') Having him end up ruined and penniless is the nice option as to what his overall philosophy will end up at.
That is all pretty fair, I am not against openly mocking the guy or his followers by any means.
Because he is the intellectual leader (lol) of internet atheists. If you don't pay attention to leaders and attempt to engage with them, you risk allowing them to brainwash too many people
Because he's done an effective job until recently of coming across as the moderate voice of reason for lots of gullible normies. Anyone younger than boomers thinks the neoliberal status quo sucks, whether left or right, and he was basically the establishment's attack poodle on social media.
Agreed. I can't believe he's still a thing.
I saw some of that Boogie2298 cancer drama coverage and saw that Destiny was on these streams and people were acting like it was a big deal and I just don't get it.
If people on this very website didn't mention him, I'd have no idea who he is. I don't think his influence is as cosmic as they do.
Smart move by the parents would be to cut him off completely, contact, inheritance, etc. I know he's not likely to need the money from them but it still sends the message that if he wishes them dead, then he should be dead to them.
Now for the Nepo Baby Hasan. Get that giggling tool.
He's been falling off and has become a lolcow, esp after interviewing a Houthi pirate and telling him that he's "just like Luffy from One Piece." Apparently even a lot of the tards who'd previously followed him thought that was too much.
send him back to turkey