Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

47
Women are getting selective service mandatory enrollment in 2025 (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by Ahaus667 2 years ago by Ahaus667 +47 / -0
33 comments share
33 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 50 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 50 points 2 years ago +50 / -0

So does that mean that in order to vote, women need to be registered to this like men do?

If so, I 100% SUPPORT this as this will probably cut away a sizable number of liberal women votes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 43 ▼
– dagthegnome 43 points 2 years ago +43 / -0

The real positive outcome from this will be that it hastens the end of Selective Service entirely. Nobody really cared for as long as only men had to formally agree to go die in globalist wars in exchange for their rights, but now that women are effected it will put booster rockets on campaigns to end the practise completely.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 36 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 36 points 2 years ago +36 / -0

Best way to get unjust laws and policies revoked, apply them equally and fully to women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

Selective Service is a PR term to invoke "fairness" in the process with a totally "random" lottery. If the feds are desperate enough, they'll simply conscript your ass, muh rights be damned.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– undecidedmask2 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Conscriptions always a gamble though. Feels like Selective Service is more "acceptable" than forcibly taking you away at gunpoint.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tourgen 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

oh you sweet summer child. you have no idea how bad things are going to get

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– norwegianwikin 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

It should. How many millions of women are eligible to vote and would be required. Any that doesn't wouldn't be eligible in the 2028 election.

Just have to find a way to prevent all those who don't register from voting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I mean, minorities are pretty much allowed to dodge the rule of needing an ID to vote so I’m sure the Democrats have a plan for when this happens. They don’t wanna lose their golden geese after all

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Tourgen 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

no, that's not the deal. in order to not go to jail you must register. that's the deal for men.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I don't think they would ever deny women the right to vote.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Tourgen 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

"they"? It's we. we can do it right now. we just do it. what are they going to do about it? they're women. If we don't do this then our nation and our people are over.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– verylargebrain 24 points 2 years ago +24 / -0

i think this women stuff in the bill is a distraction from claiming to register illegals for the draft. i doubt anyone believes women would meaningfully serve the draft the same as men. the bills true purpose is to justify giving illegals the vote

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Maybe, but once you show who their commander in chief is if they were drafted, I'm betting more will either run back or stay in the shadows...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– LastRights 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

All these wish fulfillment fantasies about women serving in the army. Also, kind of fucked up that they're making women commanding officers just to fill quotas.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– bloodguard 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

If they start firing up a real draft lottery again I predict an explosion of faux trad-wives.

This is going to be hilarious.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

A lot of "soldiers" will get suddenly pregnant.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– LibertyPrimeWasRight 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

In principle, it sounds good to make women bear the same responsibilities that men have for the power to vote, but in practice I think integrating women into the armed forces will actually decrease their effectiveness and get more men killed.

(Also, if we’re being realistic, while giving women the vote probably has some bearing on how we got to this point, at this point, I’m not convinced that the votes of men or women have any real impact on what wars we will fight).

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– EggShenBusTours 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

The army needs secretaries though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– LibertyPrimeWasRight 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

True enough, if they kept them to admin—or maybe trained them as nurses—I don’t think there would be an issue with that. Of course, that’s counting on them to make a rational decision about sex differences and interactions between women and men….

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

There have been hundreds if not thousands of unnamed female pilots since Kara Hultgreen. It's the only combat job that they're decent at.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– KingLion7 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

No. That is the slippery slope that let them into "leadership" roles. I have seen admin go female, then everything go feminist in the workplace. Secretaries, and all other roles, have to be male. Except for prostitutes and wives. Which, in the military at least, are the same thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Adamrises 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

If you look at some of those data maps for elections without X, without women its usually a near solid Red across the entire country. If you limit it to just white men, then its basically only Washington/Oregon that go Blue ever.

So it comes down to what do you think a basically unquestioned Republican government over the 1900s into now would have done to both our home politics and globally, which would then lead to which wars we fight.

I think we'd still have most them, and especially Israel related ones constantly, so you are probably right in that it wouldn't have much change on what wars we fight.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Tourgen 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

we were isolationist and nearly jew-free until women got the vote. if anything we would have joined WWII on the German side.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Mmm, smells like equality.

Ish.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Totsugeki 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

#DraftOurDaughters is no longer a meme.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Women will just get pregnant to avoid being deployed, same as they do now.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LinkR 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Won't matter. Even if, God forbid, there is a draft, they have a very simple get out of jail free card. They've used it before and they will continue to use it. I understand that it might APPEAR the scales are finally being balanced, but this doesn't mean shit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Piroko 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Increases monthly basic pay for junior enlisted servicemembers in the grades of E-1 through E-3

Every Corporal tomorrow be like...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ElmoHassel 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Pay raises? They must be getting desperate.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy