“Incels” are not particularly right-wing or white, but they are extremely depressed, anxious, and lonely, according to new resea...
AUSTIN, Texas — “Incels” (involuntary celibates) are ethnically and politically diverse, according to new research from The University of Texas at Austin, Brunel University London, and Swansea University. They also have a greater tendency to perceive thems...
Wow, it took you years of research to find out something we knew for a decade?
It's why we are so protective of games because they enabled them to socialize and not be so distant and isolated.
And that's you attack gaming so much because you WANT them isolated so that you can exploit them.
Incels are a byproduct of women breaking the social contract. Every single predatory “service” since then has been magically designed to keep inferior men paying for the illusion of affection.
They broke the social contract because we stopped enforcing it. What's happening now is we're reverting to precivilization sexual dynamics, and precivilization societies aren't far behind. Remember that video of a woman getting robbed and retards calling nearby men "beta males" for not intervening? That's because humans are a tribal species. Functional civilizations replicate the tribe dynamic at the societal level to some extent, but diseased ones likes ours revert back to small tribes (family and friends in our case). We don't help and protect people from different tribes, especially when they tell us that we're creepy and unwanted when they don't need something from us.
Was that before or after that dude was arrested because he was restraining some vagabond who OD'd on drugs? Yeah, there's a reason people no longer want to defend other people and it start with "no good deed goes unpunished".
It was after. People kept bringing up Daniel Penny in response to the shaming.
Letting them vote was a huge, possibly civilization-ending, mistake.
Pretty much this. I've noticed an almost genocidal rage against incels for not being hawt enough for fuck or exploitable enough to extract value from. It's really not a surprise when you're dealing with a population that's been shielded from the slightest inconvenience their entire lives.
If they want them isolated they aren't going to like the results. Millions of Elliot Rodgers losing their shit won't be pretty.
They think importing millions of third worlders where rape is used as an intimidation tactic is a good policy.
They aren't that good at critical thinking.
You are mistaking the rape for a bug, it is a feature.
A rape is primo currency in the victim hierarchy, with a massive bonus if it leads to a pregnancy.
Elliot Rodgers copycats only help the regime. It forwards the agenda that federal law enforcement needs more power over anyone who the regime demonizes. Including infiltrating their comms, and preemptively disarming them.
I wasn't aware there were any. They act like there's an epidemic of violence, but I only ever heard of the one dude. Other than that, it's just hurt feminist feelings.
Elliot Rodgers first victims were his 2 male roomates. He killed more men than than women.
I feel like he's the precusor to the george floyd deception, seeing how far away their narrative could be from any actual reality.
Right yeah I think he was targeting Chad as much as Staceys, but since they label his philosophy misogynistic, well and just in general, they're only concerned about women.
why would the regime care? those types never target anyone who matters.
Unless someone figures out how to communicate to potential ERs that they'll be celebrated as heros if they go after people who actually matter.
They should care because they have kids too. And they can't keep their kids locked inside their gated compounds forever, so they can end up targeted. The more people who snap and go on a killing spree, the more likely that they or someone they care about will be affected.
They don't want to exploit them, they want to kill them.
I guess if they didn't declare incels (and by definition, not having a girlfriend or wife) misogynistic, they'd never get their results published by any institution. Because the consensus among the publishers is that heterosexual men are valued based on their ability to attract a woman and if they can't, the rejection by women is by itself an act of misogyny. Fail to adhere to that belief and you're not getting published anywhere.
Reminds me of the DANMASK study which had to be gimped in order to be published because of the overwhelming assumption that face masks were good (they're not) and this study debunked their claims alongside a century of studies that were all dismissed in 2020 because of political correctness and the need to "do something".
It's a real problem in the social sciences where if your findings do not match the beliefs of the consensus, you're not getting published.
The only men who do not consistently experience this are the cream of the crop. The top 0.5%. Every other man, no matter how decent looking, charming or wealthy, will get rejected repeatedly.
You either deal with it or turn to buying sex. No two ways about it.
Of course they will be more brown. Despite 3/4 of century of iron fisted cultural control and 50 years blatantly anti-White propaganda White men are still the most desirable of all the races.
The subverted culture has ingrained into boys from as soon as they glance at a screen that being a virgin makes you a loser. And it also instills into them that doing anything that makes a female uncomfortable makes you a horrible person. So combine those two and the ones who aren't genetically gifted enough to induce tingles at first sight will naturally feel cheated and resentful.
The counterbalancing forces of strong fathers, close families, religion, and community cohesion have all been stripped away.
There is no solution outside of collapse and a reset.
For marriage, yeah. We wouldn't have coal burners looking for white chumps to foot the bill for Tyrone Jr if whites were also the best at producing tingles. That's another reason they feel cheated and resentful. No one wants to pay full price for leftovers when some deadbeat got it for free.
Dating app stats also show White men as being most desirable so, nope.
Here we have a handshake account telling you the same things as the media narrative, that black men are more sexually desirable than White men are.
What do you want me to tell you? That miscegenation isn't a problem? Dating app stats say nothing about the types of women going for white guys or whether they're putting them in the sex or provider category. The number of single mothers looking for a (usually white) cuck to pay for their half breeds tells a different story.
If only the media said the things I do about women. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings by besmirching the name of your precious white women, but if it makes you feel any better I hate women of all races, and I hate shitskins of all sexes. More than one group can be a problem at once you know.
You don't have any numbers, hand shake. Dating apps and marriage stats are the data we have. None of that backs you up. Not even miscegenation stats back you up.
It's a bunch of Hispanics who are mostly not White already. Only some of them are even mixing with Whites.
There are nearly as many White/Asian mixes as White/Black. There are more White/Indian people, yet there is no narrative about virile Indian men. Hell, is there even a word for an Indian "Tyrone" ?
Raj?
John Redcorn
That's dot Indian. I'm talking about feather Indians.
The vast majority of white women want white men and also have significantly lower bodycounts than you'd imagine, especially if you get out of cities. You've been mindfucked by propaganda and should reassess.
Archive.
That's because the incels themselves were never seen as humans worthy of their own consideration. It was always about ensuring that their existence doesn't inconvenience the most privileged creature in the history of the planet: The Western woman.
There's that gaslighting again. None of those things that they supposedly place "an extremely high value on" mean jack shit coming from an ugly dude.
I find it funny how the left is the biggest political group among incels, yet they are the ones that use the word as an insult the most. Really makes you think.
They use it to keep their own men in line. They use Karen on the White women and an assortment of 'tism and 'phobia accusations on everyone in general.
I agree, but there are no leftist "men". Only simps.
The lefties have been shown time and again not to have any understanding of any other groups. Any time they come up with something to accuse others of, they've dug it out of experience with their own movement and projected it outwards
The more interesting stat is that centrists apparently fuck. Presumably because women just love a man who knows how to speak out of both sides of his mouth.
You're assuming the (male) population groups itself roughly evenly into those three camps, when absent outside information it's just as reasonable to assume that the population splits itself up closer to the distribution seen in the study.
It's unreasonable to assume it is exactly equally split yes. But in a culture as highly politically charged as the present day US it isn't unreasonable to assume that political affiliation affects your social prospects and the differences aren't purely population effects.
It's open to whatever they decided to use to determine the affiliations when that stat was determined, because social "sciences" are bullshit with no real standards. But at least for data I've seen that uses registered rep, dem, or none/independent as a proxy (not ideal, but at least it's objective), men under 30 are pretty consistently >30% none/ind.
No, they are a tiny minority because very few people today identify as centrist, most have taken a side. Which is the same reason whites are majority, it's not because whites are more likely to be incel, its just that the research was done in white majority countries.
Chad is usually apolitical. Even when he's not no one cares about his opinion.
Look at Cenk's Nephew for example, most of his audience are young white spergs who are infatuated with him for being the "cool guy" that lets them hang out with him. Everyone else either ignores him, hates him, or only likes him for his looks and doesn't care about his politics.
To be clear, I'd love it if he became a victim of the crime that he likes to pretend isn't a thing. He's one of the most contemptible people (unfortunately) alive today.
Duh. The key is to have learned about them before the jew media sunk their fangs into it and editoralized its existence to demonize the group using the same keywords they always use
Other research has shown that they have a much higher proportion of neuroatypical individuals such as those on the autism spectrum compared to the rest of society. They're also more likely to be low on extroversion (introverted).
Which makes sense as we know that women in general prefer neurotypical and non-disabled men when it comes to long term relationship preferences.
What makes it worse is that in order to get a relationship, you need to be pro-social and preselected. Your ability to interact and socialise and therefore be successful is based on your appearance. People want to be around attractive people, people who have been pre-selected (do you wonder why when you have a girlfriend, other women start noticing you?) and people who draw other people in. Incels don't have that so end up in a perpetual cycle. Worse still, most of what makes you and your personality is genetic, hard-coded into your DNA which you can't change and personality is hard set by adulthood, when inceldom really starts to take hold.
Anyone who says it's all about personality and nothing else is lying to you. Anyone who says there's a soul mate for everyone and that everyone will find someone is also lying to you. And anyone who says you can change every aspect of yourself by going to the gym and touching grass is a genetics denier and also a liar. Not that the gym and touching grass are bad per se but they are being grossly oversold as solutions for everything and "blank slate" self-help gurus are exploiting people for cash by promising everything and ultimately telling them things they could find out for free online.
The incel/blackpill thing sounds like Bio-Leninism.
And the solution is more feminist sensitive training
Just look at Canada reinventing Aktion T4 with extra steps by pushing it on all their useless eaters and offering almost-literal blackpills to the mentally ill. Or for that matter, prog activists handing out drugs to homeless addicts and blocking efforts to force these people into rehab/asylums.
There's a very dark motive behind a lot of prog activism that entails the extermination of undesirables through superficially "compassionate" methods. For some of them I assume it's a way to reconcile a guilty conscience with their visceral disgust for undesirables, convincing themselves that enabling said undesirables to make the "valid" choice to end their own lives is the kind thing to do. But I think others within that milieu are legitimate psychopaths who experience a genuine demonic thrill at perverting virtues into vices.
no shit sherlock (not you, the article)
Research like this might be obvious to us, but it is necessary for the people who can't notice patterns.
...or for people too dumb to just ask people...
Seriously, I don't know how many times, I've stumbled across some lefty thread where they're trying to figure out why right-wingers do this or that, and they make these wild speculations, and I can't stop myself from posting something along the lines of
Even this research itself is pointing out that most researchers of the "Incel" phenomenon don't actually ask incels for their opinion.