I guess if they didn't declare incels (and by definition, not having a girlfriend or wife) misogynistic, they'd never get their results published by any institution. Because the consensus among the publishers is that heterosexual men are valued based on their ability to attract a woman and if they can't, the rejection by women is by itself an act of misogyny. Fail to adhere to that belief and you're not getting published anywhere.
Reminds me of the DANMASK study which had to be gimped in order to be published because of the overwhelming assumption that face masks were good (they're not) and this study debunked their claims alongside a century of studies that were all dismissed in 2020 because of political correctness and the need to "do something".
It's a real problem in the social sciences where if your findings do not match the beliefs of the consensus, you're not getting published.
I guess if they didn't declare incels (and by definition, not having a girlfriend or wife) misogynistic, they'd never get their results published by any institution. Because the consensus among the publishers is that heterosexual men are valued based on their ability to attract a woman and if they can't, the rejection by women is by itself an act of misogyny. Fail to adhere to that belief and you're not getting published anywhere.
Reminds me of the DANMASK study which had to be gimped in order to be published because of the overwhelming assumption that face masks were good (they're not) and this study debunked their claims alongside a century of studies that were all dismissed in 2020 because of political correctness and the need to "do something".
It's a real problem in the social sciences where if your findings do not match the beliefs of the consensus, you're not getting published.