Those not logged in to Twitter will not see the context:
A family has reached out to That Park Place claiming they spent over $300 on a character meet and greet dinner at Walt Disney World... only to discover the Evil Queen character was almost certainly a biological male.
The same people who claim that genitals have nothing to do with your sex, think that you're wondering about someone's genitals when you point out their sex.
The Guillotine is just good for mass executions. If you only need to do a few at a time, a sword will do. Or a knife like ISIS these days.
You can cut a lot of throats if you have to. It makes a huge mess, though. The guillotine is among other things cleaner. But still it's a big installation for killing one dude. And you can get someone to clean up.
Apparently a family is mad they paid for a meet n greet with a female Disney character and the actor was actually male. IMO anyone who still gives Disney money deserves what they get.
Do people forget that Shakespeare had men playing women’s parts or are we just gonna let it be forgotten . This performer is fabulous and I hope she’s having a great day
BRUH. That's a man. That's the issue. God, modern woke nonsense is so retarded. Pick a fucking lane.
And it puts the response in context too:
it’s very weird to look at a theme park performer and wonder about their genitals
No one is wondering about their genitals. That's irrelevant. Ironically, the lefty is linking sex with "gender" yet again. That's a dude pretending to be a lady...badly. Cringe, and it would be disappointing...and it's completely unnecessary. In this day and age...there are plenty of female actresses. So there's no fucking reason for this, and any attempted justification just makes everything even more retarded.
They were right to feel cheated, and this dude shouldn't be playing that role. It's not difficult.
Which is the entire point of the film 'Shakespeare in Love'. You would think a fairly modern ish telling of the issue would sit more in the mind of the general public but then this is the same group who reelects the same fuckups only after a few years so their memoirs evidently count for squat.
Yup, and everyone who knows that men played women back then should know that. But if they've only been fed a line for their trans agenda, instead they end up looking like a total moron like this guy.
It would be hilarious if the movement these people represent didn't have so much power.
A family has reached out to That Park Place claiming they spent over $300 on a character meet and greet dinner at Walt Disney World... only to discover the Evil Queen character was almost certainly a biological male.
Yeah fuck every single one of those people commenting. It’s a waste of money but they are free to spend it however they want. Although if I pay money to have my daughter meet “Cinderella” at the very least I would ask that they didn’t dress up some faggot groomer and stick with an actual woman instead.
I would argue that, when it comes to Disney, Universal and WB, people, at least some people, go for the express purpose of meeting the dressed-up staff…
As an adult, I find that quite odd, and it’s partly why I found Universal Studios a bit disappointing (the rides sucked, lol), but clearly some people go for expressly that reason, especially families with children, as here…
In that same Universal Experience, if the Lucille Ball impersonator that came up to us while we were having lunch was a drag queen, I would definitely have freaked the fuck out, lol…
If it's a full body costume like Mickey or any similar character then that can certainly bring up the question at times but only so much. A 6' 5" dude as Goofy will be fairly obvious vs a 5' shortstack as Minnie. It wouldn't surprise me if those costumes are all only one size for production issues so only certain people would get put in them anyway.
The issue becomes greater when it's simply someone dressed up but still showing their face like Gaston and whoever else works like that. The article mentions the "Evil Queen" so if it's the one from Sleeping Beauty then that could be either option while some others are far more likely to be whole body costumes like the later appearances of the similar character from Snow White when she turns into a crone.
Those not logged in to Twitter will not see the context:
The same people who claim that genitals have nothing to do with your sex, think that you're wondering about someone's genitals when you point out their sex.
what the fuck is wrong with normies? why would anyone waste their money on this dumb shit
Apropos of nothing, burning at the stake was a very useful and cost effective method execution.
Waste of firewood. Guillotine is reusable, it’s CO2 neutral, and there’s 0 chance of being rescued once you pull the lever.
Hey lumberjacks still need work man. Can't just cut them out like this.
They can cut the work to build the frames.
I think they can be ahead of the situation with their axes filed.
The Guillotine is just good for mass executions. If you only need to do a few at a time, a sword will do. Or a knife like ISIS these days.
You can cut a lot of throats if you have to. It makes a huge mess, though. The guillotine is among other things cleaner. But still it's a big installation for killing one dude. And you can get someone to clean up.
I've ranted about it before but, holy fuck, "X" is totally unusable if you're not logged in.
EDIT: Incidentally, does anyone have a link to the tweet that is being responded to? I'm only seeing Catherine, and not the OOCParks tweet.
https://twitter.com/OOCParks/status/1784207587111526877
Apparently a family is mad they paid for a meet n greet with a female Disney character and the actor was actually male. IMO anyone who still gives Disney money deserves what they get.
Excellent, thank you for the context.
BRUH. That's a man. That's the issue. God, modern woke nonsense is so retarded. Pick a fucking lane.
And it puts the response in context too:
No one is wondering about their genitals. That's irrelevant. Ironically, the lefty is linking sex with "gender" yet again. That's a dude pretending to be a lady...badly. Cringe, and it would be disappointing...and it's completely unnecessary. In this day and age...there are plenty of female actresses. So there's no fucking reason for this, and any attempted justification just makes everything even more retarded.
They were right to feel cheated, and this dude shouldn't be playing that role. It's not difficult.
Arg, I hate Modern Whatever.
The quip about Shakespeare having men playing women isn't the progressive flex they think it is.
Shakespeare had men playing women because women weren't allowed to act, not because Shakespeare was TrAnS InClUsIvE
Which is the entire point of the film 'Shakespeare in Love'. You would think a fairly modern ish telling of the issue would sit more in the mind of the general public but then this is the same group who reelects the same fuckups only after a few years so their memoirs evidently count for squat.
Yup, and everyone who knows that men played women back then should know that. But if they've only been fed a line for their trans agenda, instead they end up looking like a total moron like this guy.
It would be hilarious if the movement these people represent didn't have so much power.
I mean...
Yeah fuck every single one of those people commenting. It’s a waste of money but they are free to spend it however they want. Although if I pay money to have my daughter meet “Cinderella” at the very least I would ask that they didn’t dress up some faggot groomer and stick with an actual woman instead.
Why. The fuck. Are you thinking about such things at all regarding theme park staff? They're the staff, not the attractions.
I would argue that, when it comes to Disney, Universal and WB, people, at least some people, go for the express purpose of meeting the dressed-up staff…
As an adult, I find that quite odd, and it’s partly why I found Universal Studios a bit disappointing (the rides sucked, lol), but clearly some people go for expressly that reason, especially families with children, as here…
In that same Universal Experience, if the Lucille Ball impersonator that came up to us while we were having lunch was a drag queen, I would definitely have freaked the fuck out, lol…
If it's a full body costume like Mickey or any similar character then that can certainly bring up the question at times but only so much. A 6' 5" dude as Goofy will be fairly obvious vs a 5' shortstack as Minnie. It wouldn't surprise me if those costumes are all only one size for production issues so only certain people would get put in them anyway.
The issue becomes greater when it's simply someone dressed up but still showing their face like Gaston and whoever else works like that. The article mentions the "Evil Queen" so if it's the one from Sleeping Beauty then that could be either option while some others are far more likely to be whole body costumes like the later appearances of the similar character from Snow White when she turns into a crone.
All I can say is No Context Theme Parks seems to be accurately named, because I have no idea what they are talking about.
I assume they're talking about the costumed actors that greet people and take photos. Different characters wherever you go, but it's the same idea.
why do you keep posting these zero engagement nobodies
But we don't wonder, we know you're a man in drag who will never ever be a woman.