Which is the entire point of the film 'Shakespeare in Love'. You would think a fairly modern ish telling of the issue would sit more in the mind of the general public but then this is the same group who reelects the same fuckups only after a few years so their memoirs evidently count for squat.
Yup, and everyone who knows that men played women back then should know that. But if they've only been fed a line for their trans agenda, instead they end up looking like a total moron like this guy.
It would be hilarious if the movement these people represent didn't have so much power.
The quip about Shakespeare having men playing women isn't the progressive flex they think it is.
Shakespeare had men playing women because women weren't allowed to act, not because Shakespeare was TrAnS InClUsIvE
Which is the entire point of the film 'Shakespeare in Love'. You would think a fairly modern ish telling of the issue would sit more in the mind of the general public but then this is the same group who reelects the same fuckups only after a few years so their memoirs evidently count for squat.
Yup, and everyone who knows that men played women back then should know that. But if they've only been fed a line for their trans agenda, instead they end up looking like a total moron like this guy.
It would be hilarious if the movement these people represent didn't have so much power.