Do people forget that Shakespeare had men playing women’s parts or are we just gonna let it be forgotten . This performer is fabulous and I hope she’s having a great day
BRUH. That's a man. That's the issue. God, modern woke nonsense is so retarded. Pick a fucking lane.
And it puts the response in context too:
it’s very weird to look at a theme park performer and wonder about their genitals
No one is wondering about their genitals. That's irrelevant. Ironically, the lefty is linking sex with "gender" yet again. That's a dude pretending to be a lady...badly. Cringe, and it would be disappointing...and it's completely unnecessary. In this day and age...there are plenty of female actresses. So there's no fucking reason for this, and any attempted justification just makes everything even more retarded.
They were right to feel cheated, and this dude shouldn't be playing that role. It's not difficult.
Which is the entire point of the film 'Shakespeare in Love'. You would think a fairly modern ish telling of the issue would sit more in the mind of the general public but then this is the same group who reelects the same fuckups only after a few years so their memoirs evidently count for squat.
Yup, and everyone who knows that men played women back then should know that. But if they've only been fed a line for their trans agenda, instead they end up looking like a total moron like this guy.
It would be hilarious if the movement these people represent didn't have so much power.
Excellent, thank you for the context.
BRUH. That's a man. That's the issue. God, modern woke nonsense is so retarded. Pick a fucking lane.
And it puts the response in context too:
No one is wondering about their genitals. That's irrelevant. Ironically, the lefty is linking sex with "gender" yet again. That's a dude pretending to be a lady...badly. Cringe, and it would be disappointing...and it's completely unnecessary. In this day and age...there are plenty of female actresses. So there's no fucking reason for this, and any attempted justification just makes everything even more retarded.
They were right to feel cheated, and this dude shouldn't be playing that role. It's not difficult.
Arg, I hate Modern Whatever.
The quip about Shakespeare having men playing women isn't the progressive flex they think it is.
Shakespeare had men playing women because women weren't allowed to act, not because Shakespeare was TrAnS InClUsIvE
Which is the entire point of the film 'Shakespeare in Love'. You would think a fairly modern ish telling of the issue would sit more in the mind of the general public but then this is the same group who reelects the same fuckups only after a few years so their memoirs evidently count for squat.
Yup, and everyone who knows that men played women back then should know that. But if they've only been fed a line for their trans agenda, instead they end up looking like a total moron like this guy.
It would be hilarious if the movement these people represent didn't have so much power.