Yes, and people in the 50’s also used to put radioactive materials on their body because they believed it increased fertility. There’s a social cognitive dissonance when it comes to the gate creaking open and masses flooding through. We see one troon and go “aw it thinks it’s a woman” we see 500k and go “why are these creepy fucks demanding legal rights to use bathrooms with underage girls?”
Fake and gay. It used to be socially acceptable to beat the hell out of someone because they were homosexual, so does anyone seriously believe people would tolerate a male pretending to be a woman?
Just bugs bunny. But even then its because they know he's supposed to laughed at or mocked when he's doing it and his victims mocked and laughed at even further for falling for his act.
Cross-Dressing and Transgenders aren't even close to the same thing, and the entirety of the Queer movement is lying and they are pretending that it's not true. Same thing with Drag Queens. Drag Queens are never transgender. It's a performance attire. If someone is being a drag queen off stage, then they are a lunatic.
Absolutely, but the exact question I'm replying to said "a male pretending to be a woman". Drag was considered funny (and it still is funny). The people of the 1950s would tolerate a man dressing as a woman but they would very bluntly callout someone for actually believing they are the gender they are disguising themselves as.
Despite being raised in the dirty South, none of my upbringing even brought up homos or trannies. We didn't have any so no one even bothered to teach us about them. My entire first experience with them was seeing drag queens on TV and Pride Parades on the news. Both of which gave me an instant revulsion and disgust that has not changed to this day.
Them "normalizing" themselves just created a world where more and more people are aware of their existence, and their "normal" is disgusting enough that most people will hate it without being scared into acceptance.
They definitely left out that bit of context, but I can't tell if it was on purpose or if they're too stupid to realize. It honestly wouldn't surprise me if they used the "bearded woman" as some kind of proof for trans acceptance next.
I've seen UFOtards reference The Weekly World News without having a clue that it was basically not just a tabloid, but an admittedly fictional newspaper that was mostly useful for getting an easy writing credit for writing the most absurd news story you could possibly submit.
In fairness to the Weekly World News (the world’s only reliable news source) they did publish a true story about a woman dying in a town near me when she was smoking while putting on hairspray.
A 1950s sex change and a modern troon freak have almost nothing in common. It's like when they pretend Japanese genderbending stories are culturally connected to troonism or the Vikings were raiding with proud trans PoC folx.
Considering the surgical techniques of the time period, I seriously doubt they would have been doing shit like skin grafts and using the colon as a neo-vagina. The likelihood of death from those kinds of surgeries would have been astronomical.
Yes, but they used to have to hide it instead of having rallies where the police will use deadly force to defend bacha bazi rituals at noon in major US cities.
"TRANS PEOPLE WERE ALWAYS ACCEPTED SEE LOOK AT THIS JEWISH NEWSPAPER CHUD!"
hahahahaha they would have put you with the fucking circus clowns with the world's fattest (200lb) woman. They thought that shit was so funny that it was a regular part of comedy for a man to dress up as a woman for actual shits and giggles.
How do you accept transgenderism, when gender was invented in the 1970's?
We don't even know what newspaper this is from, it says "Daily News". Is this from *the New York Daily News" or is it something else?
Do you understand that they would have still called him a Transvestite Homosexual in every other point?
This is like when they say "There have always been transgender bathrooms". No. You're thinking of family restrooms, and both sex restrooms; not "all gender" or "transgender".
For those that don’t know there are 4 major news papers in NYC. Two are read mostly by people outside of NYC. Those are The New York Times and the Wall Street journal. And two are read by New Yorkers. Those are the NY Daily News and the NY Post. And wouldn’t you know it, two of them are left wing and two are right wing.
Pointing to this paper is like pointed to the Village Voice or some other faggot paper. And I’d imagine most of the people who read this story were thinking “wow that nutjob chopped off his dick,” and not “yassss slay queen.”
Yes, and people in the 50’s also used to put radioactive materials on their body because they believed it increased fertility. There’s a social cognitive dissonance when it comes to the gate creaking open and masses flooding through. We see one troon and go “aw it thinks it’s a woman” we see 500k and go “why are these creepy fucks demanding legal rights to use bathrooms with underage girls?”
Fake and gay. It used to be socially acceptable to beat the hell out of someone because they were homosexual, so does anyone seriously believe people would tolerate a male pretending to be a woman?
Just bugs bunny. But even then its because they know he's supposed to laughed at or mocked when he's doing it and his victims mocked and laughed at even further for falling for his act.
Cross-Dressing and Transgenders aren't even close to the same thing, and the entirety of the Queer movement is lying and they are pretending that it's not true. Same thing with Drag Queens. Drag Queens are never transgender. It's a performance attire. If someone is being a drag queen off stage, then they are a lunatic.
Wearing a dress and makeup doesn’t make you a woman.
See: kabuki theater, or traditional garb in both China and Japan.
Absolutely, but the exact question I'm replying to said "a male pretending to be a woman". Drag was considered funny (and it still is funny). The people of the 1950s would tolerate a man dressing as a woman but they would very bluntly callout someone for actually believing they are the gender they are disguising themselves as.
I concur, I'm just adding to it since there is intentional conflation about Cross-dressers, transexuals, transvestites, and transgenders, by queers.
Yeah, they always overlook the fact that he only cross-dressed to make fools out of his enemies.
Despite being raised in the dirty South, none of my upbringing even brought up homos or trannies. We didn't have any so no one even bothered to teach us about them. My entire first experience with them was seeing drag queens on TV and Pride Parades on the news. Both of which gave me an instant revulsion and disgust that has not changed to this day.
Them "normalizing" themselves just created a world where more and more people are aware of their existence, and their "normal" is disgusting enough that most people will hate it without being scared into acceptance.
The Daily News was a tabloid.
This is the 50s equivalent of "Hillary Clinton Adopts Alien Baby" or "Man Fries Eggs On His Bald Head".
They definitely left out that bit of context, but I can't tell if it was on purpose or if they're too stupid to realize. It honestly wouldn't surprise me if they used the "bearded woman" as some kind of proof for trans acceptance next.
I've seen UFOtards reference The Weekly World News without having a clue that it was basically not just a tabloid, but an admittedly fictional newspaper that was mostly useful for getting an easy writing credit for writing the most absurd news story you could possibly submit.
In fairness to the Weekly World News (the world’s only reliable news source) they did publish a true story about a woman dying in a town near me when she was smoking while putting on hairspray.
The Weekly World News was such a guilty pleasure of mine. I still miss it dearly.
All equally more tolerable things than modern day troons
A 1950s sex change and a modern troon freak have almost nothing in common. It's like when they pretend Japanese genderbending stories are culturally connected to troonism or the Vikings were raiding with proud trans PoC folx.
Considering the surgical techniques of the time period, I seriously doubt they would have been doing shit like skin grafts and using the colon as a neo-vagina. The likelihood of death from those kinds of surgeries would have been astronomical.
"Trans people have always been marginalized and oppressed unless it is convenient to me to claim that they weren't."
Yeah were they always going after toddlers too?
This criteria is always baffling. Suddenly the progressives don't think change is necessary
They were - John Money, the "scientist" they reference here, was a pedophile who experimented on children.
Yes, but they used to have to hide it instead of having rallies where the police will use deadly force to defend bacha bazi rituals at noon in major US cities.
One of those "oddity" stories newspapers run to bait in more readers.
Great, then let's go back to the 1950s.
hahahahaha they would have put you with the fucking circus clowns with the world's fattest (200lb) woman. They thought that shit was so funny that it was a regular part of comedy for a man to dress up as a woman for actual shits and giggles.
How do you accept transgenderism, when gender was invented in the 1970's?
We don't even know what newspaper this is from, it says "Daily News". Is this from *the New York Daily News" or is it something else?
Do you understand that they would have still called him a Transvestite Homosexual in every other point?
This is like when they say "There have always been transgender bathrooms". No. You're thinking of family restrooms, and both sex restrooms; not "all gender" or "transgender".
For those that don’t know there are 4 major news papers in NYC. Two are read mostly by people outside of NYC. Those are The New York Times and the Wall Street journal. And two are read by New Yorkers. Those are the NY Daily News and the NY Post. And wouldn’t you know it, two of them are left wing and two are right wing.
Pointing to this paper is like pointed to the Village Voice or some other faggot paper. And I’d imagine most of the people who read this story were thinking “wow that nutjob chopped off his dick,” and not “yassss slay queen.”
Mhm. If it was actually normalized, it would never make the news. "Breaking: Woman identifies as a woman, makes a sandwich. More at 9."
It's a freakshow, always has been.
This must be why 'Glen or Glenda?' was a box office smash that put Ed Wood at the top of the industry.
Let's just forget that it's front page news because of sensationalism and being extremely rare.
“Pull the strings”