Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

59
‘People of color’ can’t be racist against whites, UW-Madison teaches law students (www.thecollegefix.com)
posted 2 years ago by NatalieBiden 2 years ago by NatalieBiden +59 / -0
‘People of color’ can’t be racist against whites, UW-Madison teaches law students | The College Fix
One UW-Madison student called the DEI training ‘incredibly toxic.’…
www.thecollegefix.com
43 comments share
43 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (43)
sorted by:
▲ 42 ▼
– NatalieBiden [S] 42 points 2 years ago +42 / -0

I posted this because I see many pRedditors deny that anyone ever claims this.

And here we see law students are taught this.

Imagine the damage to our legal system.

Meanwhile the only true measure of racism (interracial crime stats) show that almost all racism comes from blacks…

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Nikola_S1 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I believe I have an interesting counter: OK, people of color can't be racist against whites, however they can be racist++. See, racism++ is the same as racism, except that people of color can be racist towards whites. This obviously makes it worse, so why aren't we doing anything to fight racism++?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– deleted 22 points 2 years ago +22 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– NatalieBiden [S] 21 points 2 years ago +21 / -0

Step 1- Introduce “hate” laws that force police to prioritize protecting certain groups.

Step 2- Defund the police so only priority crimes are ever solved.

Step 3- AGGRESSIVELY Prosecute self defense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Kaarous 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Curious, what does preparing accordingly look like for you? As far as I can recall you're British so I'm curious what you plan on doing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Kaarous 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Ah,I take it you just plan to move to, or already live in a rural area then, and plan to ride it out? Or did I misunderstand?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Kaarous 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

See, my concern wasn't food. It was defensibility. Much like my own, your government has imported millions of foreign barbarians to assist in oppressing you, and I was curious to what extent your nation was preparing to deal with such a thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 17 ▼
– realerfunction 17 points 2 years ago +17 / -0

so you admit "racism" is a fake concept only intended to be used as a weapon against european diaspora.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Kaarous 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

Given that it was first popularized by Trotsky, that cat was out of the bag long ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– BlueDrache 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

Objectively false.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– barwhack 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

Corrollary: leftists cannot have civil societies.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Guy_Incognito76 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

Racism just means "White people are the Devil" now. If it ever meant anything else.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Smith1980 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I hate this logic. Makes zero sense

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

If you consider the facts that the term racism was popularized to be a weapon against White people and that "anti-racist" is code for "anti-White", it makes perfect sense. See also the stages of genocide.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Smith1980 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I get that but I guess it really annoys me because it goes against everything I was raised to believe

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

I get you, I was raised to be colorblind too. Realizing just how many people, who I was raised to treat fairly, hate me simply for for being White was a difficult redpill to stomach.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SR388-SAX 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I still judge people as individuals but I'm definitely no longer colorblind.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Smith1980 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I still see myself as colorblind in the sense that I’m not going to make a judgement about an individual solely based on race but I’m not blind to what goes on around me like I once was. I still try to be a good Christian

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

We aren't commanded to be doormats or pacifists, you know. There's nothing wrong with keeping your guard up when interacting with people from groups that typically hate the groups you belong to. While we're told to love our neighbor, we're also told the man who doesn't take care of his own household is worse than a nonbeliver.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Smith1980 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I know but just in the sense of the individual. I want to give people a chance but you do have to be guarded in certain situations

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– fauxgnaws 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Also any time somebody talks about "people of color" rephrase it as "anti-white" in your response. Because that's what it means.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

So a black person can be "imma kill your white ass. I hate white people and im gonna kill you and rape your wife and daughter because they are white. Im doing this because im racist against white people"... not motivated by racism.

These assholes are the same ones that write "believe all women" even when there is proof the woman maliciously made up a lie.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RoulerBleu 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

In Clownada, a court rules that an aboriginal woman screaming "I hate White people" as she punched a White woman in the face would not be charged with a hate crime because who could really know if that motivated her, or if it was simply a manifestation of systemic racism opressing the poor non-White in mysterious ways.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ElmoHassel 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

This assumption has been in operation for decades and is nothing new:

“People of color, as a social group, do not have the societal, institutional power to oppress white people as a group,” the training states. “An individual person of color abusing a white person – while clearly wrong, (no person should be insulted, hurt, etc.) is acting out a personal racial prejudice, not racism.”

The mealymouthed PR flak for U of W says:

I think the way in which this particular project was executed made more people feel excluded than included in these kinds of conversations and that’s the opposite of what we want.

The hivemind has no time for the individual. To them the individual is at all times operating under the abstract groups alleged assumptions.

This must be what it's like to think like an ant in an anthill, or a bee in a hive. But this disrespects ants and bees.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– I_Bent_My_Wookiee 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

“We do not expect students to automatically accept the views expressed in the document referred to, any more than they would the reasoning of a legal brief, judicial opinion, or their professors,” the spokesperson said. “Intellectual and academic freedom are core values of the Law School.”

If you do not accept these beliefs, we will have struggle sessions with you until you do.

“Accordingly, we welcome and encourage vigorous debate over important questions of law and policy, and this session provided a forum for such discourse,” the spokesperson said.

Yes, please stick your neck out so we know who to protest, level false allegations against and eventually expel from university.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– deleted 27 points 2 years ago +27 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– Happygo 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

You won't ever be selected for jury duty. They will use a bunch of random chinks, niggers, spics, and kikes to convict you.

A jury of your "peers". Like we are equal to women and third world shit skins. How insulting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy