Yeah but women don't hate sluts for the right reasons even though hating sluts is good. Women hate sluts out of jealousy and because women believe sluts devalue them so they will have a harder time exploiting men for their own gain. Women understand supply/demand and they know when you reduce supply you increase the price and women want the supply of sex reduced so they can get higher prices from men. It's all about benefiting women to the detriment of men.
Logically explain how sluts don't benefit men then without using the word "degenerate".
If good looking women want to have casual sex with men, without any strings attached, and you're one of the men she wants to have sex with. That's a benefit. Of course being married to a 10/10 18yo virgin who cannot leave you and is forced by law to do everything you say is ideal but you can't guarantee that woman to every man even in a society without whores and sluts so in the absence of enough of these kinds of women to go around for men, some men do indeed benefit instead from sluts.
While I'm quite a fan of sluts, he has a point. Having casual sex does not benefit you. It's like saying that going to McDonald's benefits people, because of the momentary pleasure.
Of course being married to a 10/10 18yo virgin who cannot leave you and is forced by law to do everything you say is ideal
I can't imagine why someone who wants a slave, has some difficulty finding a woman.
In his mind, because she's criticizing free porn sites for allegedly turning a blind eye to human trafficking, she's supporting paid porn sites. Because this anti-porn group wants you to pay for porn, so that women receive money.
It isn't that outlandish by his standards. He earlier claimed that Mastercard took action against pornhub in order to benefit women working on Onlyfans (which he especially hates because the porn stars get more of the earnings), and even found some woman working for Mastercard whom he held responsible.
if you must coomsoom, coomsoom drawings and animations. no chance of fucked-up sex trafficking and no giving money to talentless whores. it's a win win.
You said porn was women's weapon to create simps and distract men. I guess you are so right about everything you even get right the things that contradict eachother
I don't argue to ban porn, only that we should phase out using real people for it by promoting AI and drawn more BECAUSE of all the exploitation, trafficking and indoctrination tactics they already admit to.
These cunts being more 'ban porn because I ain't getting my paycheck' are the bitches you avoid at all costs as no matter what, they see men as moving atms.
we have the ability to filter porn sites without the feds spying on you. parents need to use it, as well as actually being in the habit of admining their kid's internet access.
Those are separate arguments. Parents shouldn't let their kids try to walk into strip clubs but the clubs should also check ID. Multiple gates avoid single points of failure.
How is it spying more than asking for ID to buy beer?
When asking for I D at the bar, a waiter is simply looking at the date on a piece of plastic. They don't log your face, location, or anything else.
On the Internet, every ID verification pings a database of some sort, and that database will be programmed to log who asked for whose id, for what purpose, when, and where. These databases will be exposed to any government official that has sway, and we all know how good they are at abusing these systems.
I don't dispute anything you are saying and at the same time I really don't care.
The privacy of coomers is FAR down the list of important topics compared to protecting children from porn.
If you come up with a system that is as effective or more effective but doesn't have the same privacy concerns then I would support it. But until someone invents that an ID check is about the best have.
That's just it, it won't stop at the coomers. They will use social taboos to trojan-horse Digital ID.
It's already implemented for gun owners, and there is a push to implement it for coomers. Next it will be drinkers, then gamblers, then sports car drivers, then junk food eaters, then regular car drivers, then grocery buyers. Finally, everything will require an ID checkin. Why? not only is the data profitable, but they can control everything about your life so they can keep exploiting you.
Once it's got a foothold, it will never go away. Don't give digital ID an inch.
I repeat the question from the previous post. What is your plan to keep porn away from kids that also "protects privacy"?
If you don't have one and just crap on the ones other people make then you made it clear that exposing millions of kids to porn is less important to you than being slightly inconvenienced when you want to rub one out.
But even if ID for porn is implemented I can solve your "privacy" problem. Go buy a magazine with cash. I guarantee you the clerk will forget your face in about 20 seconds and any camera footage is wiped weekly if not daily, assuming the cameras work at all.
Unless you think hardcore porn should be displayed on billboards across the street from elementary schools then you are also in favor of some rules about it.
You'll claim anything proves your point. Remember that your claim was that she attacks Pornhub and not Onlyfans, because at Onlyfans more earnings go to the women. Now you're trying to shift the goalposts to: eh, they're actually fine with anything, as long as there is a female CEO.
Women don't like how men can get porn for free. That's it. The end. It's also why women hate sluts because the men are getting it for free.
You're missing out part of it, "because it lowers their own value when others do it for free".
Women hating sluts is the correct course of action, and they should do it more.
Yeah but women don't hate sluts for the right reasons even though hating sluts is good. Women hate sluts out of jealousy and because women believe sluts devalue them so they will have a harder time exploiting men for their own gain. Women understand supply/demand and they know when you reduce supply you increase the price and women want the supply of sex reduced so they can get higher prices from men. It's all about benefiting women to the detriment of men.
Sluts do not benefit men so hating them does not harm men.
Sluts can benefit men, if they aren't entitled.
degenerate
Logically explain how sluts don't benefit men then without using the word "degenerate".
If good looking women want to have casual sex with men, without any strings attached, and you're one of the men she wants to have sex with. That's a benefit. Of course being married to a 10/10 18yo virgin who cannot leave you and is forced by law to do everything you say is ideal but you can't guarantee that woman to every man even in a society without whores and sluts so in the absence of enough of these kinds of women to go around for men, some men do indeed benefit instead from sluts.
Sluts are not wife and mother material. Slutting around is causing the absence you are complaining about. How the hell did you miss that?
While I'm quite a fan of sluts, he has a point. Having casual sex does not benefit you. It's like saying that going to McDonald's benefits people, because of the momentary pleasure.
I can't imagine why someone who wants a slave, has some difficulty finding a woman.
Supporting marriage doesn't benefit men, but I don't think you'll drop that crusade.
Yes, yes, yes. I know. Watch porn. Don't have kids. Hate your own women. Support Israel. There is no anti-White agenda. 🧯🧯🧯
I'm starting to get deja vu from our conversation.
We already had a discussion about the risks and probabilities.
It's not my fault if you can't understand it but you owe it to everyone here to acknowledge how low the chance of success is.
Am I crazy? The posts in the image say the exact opposite of what is claimed in the title.
In his mind, because she's criticizing free porn sites for allegedly turning a blind eye to human trafficking, she's supporting paid porn sites. Because this anti-porn group wants you to pay for porn, so that women receive money.
It isn't that outlandish by his standards. He earlier claimed that Mastercard took action against pornhub in order to benefit women working on Onlyfans (which he especially hates because the porn stars get more of the earnings), and even found some woman working for Mastercard whom he held responsible.
Ok, gotcha. I just wasn't doing the correct mind-reading.
Amazing what conclusions one can come to when one adopts insane premises.
Anti porn people are anti porn, not anti free porn in favor of paid porn.
Imp is actually an insane troon, so. The only people who hate women this much are "men" who used to be women.
Nah, Imp is actually an FtM pooner
Yeah, you're crazy.
But that's not surprising.
if you must coomsoom, coomsoom drawings and animations. no chance of fucked-up sex trafficking and no giving money to talentless whores. it's a win win.
Do you not remember that furry, diaper troon who was using real images of babies as reference material?
forgot about that, that's pretty fucked up. did they book him?
Whoever this woman is, she doesn't seem to be a fan of OnlyFans either.
https://nitter.net/LailaMickelwait/status/1428495772522213378
That was before the female CEO.
All of these "porn bad" shills magically stopped caring about things like that when the men stepped down.
It's still owned by Leonid Radvinsky, right?
I'm not sure what you want me to do with that information.
The entire board is female, but you know better!
You said porn was women's weapon to create simps and distract men. I guess you are so right about everything you even get right the things that contradict eachother
Imp holds all positions simultaneously, so yeah, of course he's always right.
I don't argue to ban porn, only that we should phase out using real people for it by promoting AI and drawn more BECAUSE of all the exploitation, trafficking and indoctrination tactics they already admit to.
These cunts being more 'ban porn because I ain't getting my paycheck' are the bitches you avoid at all costs as no matter what, they see men as moving atms.
Don't ban porn. Make it a crime to display it in a manner that is accessible to minors without a practically functional age gate.
Not an "are you 18" checkbox but an actual ID check.
we have the ability to filter porn sites without the feds spying on you. parents need to use it, as well as actually being in the habit of admining their kid's internet access.
https://cleanbrowsing.org/
Those are separate arguments. Parents shouldn't let their kids try to walk into strip clubs but the clubs should also check ID. Multiple gates avoid single points of failure.
How is it spying more than asking for ID to buy beer?
When asking for I D at the bar, a waiter is simply looking at the date on a piece of plastic. They don't log your face, location, or anything else.
On the Internet, every ID verification pings a database of some sort, and that database will be programmed to log who asked for whose id, for what purpose, when, and where. These databases will be exposed to any government official that has sway, and we all know how good they are at abusing these systems.
I don't dispute anything you are saying and at the same time I really don't care.
The privacy of coomers is FAR down the list of important topics compared to protecting children from porn.
If you come up with a system that is as effective or more effective but doesn't have the same privacy concerns then I would support it. But until someone invents that an ID check is about the best have.
That's just it, it won't stop at the coomers. They will use social taboos to trojan-horse Digital ID.
It's already implemented for gun owners, and there is a push to implement it for coomers. Next it will be drinkers, then gamblers, then sports car drivers, then junk food eaters, then regular car drivers, then grocery buyers. Finally, everything will require an ID checkin. Why? not only is the data profitable, but they can control everything about your life so they can keep exploiting you.
Once it's got a foothold, it will never go away. Don't give digital ID an inch.
I repeat the question from the previous post. What is your plan to keep porn away from kids that also "protects privacy"?
If you don't have one and just crap on the ones other people make then you made it clear that exposing millions of kids to porn is less important to you than being slightly inconvenienced when you want to rub one out.
But even if ID for porn is implemented I can solve your "privacy" problem. Go buy a magazine with cash. I guarantee you the clerk will forget your face in about 20 seconds and any camera footage is wiped weekly if not daily, assuming the cameras work at all.
These pricks use libertarian lobby groups in the courts to inhibit those ID checks.
Retarded anarchist argument.
Unless you think hardcore porn should be displayed on billboards across the street from elementary schools then you are also in favor of some rules about it.
You'd do it if it kept women in check
Pimps and hoes go together like peas and carrots.
Archive Link
Apparently it's no longer trafficking if you pay for it.
OnlyFans, a platform caught verifying literal CP, gets a pass because it's run by women, for women's benefit.
It took me 20 seconds to fine the following, from this same account:
Bing, when did Tim Stokely resign as CEO of OnlyFans
December 2021
You're just proving my point. She shut up when women took charge, which was also when the exploitation of "customers" started ramping up heavily.
You'll claim anything proves your point. Remember that your claim was that she attacks Pornhub and not Onlyfans, because at Onlyfans more earnings go to the women. Now you're trying to shift the goalposts to: eh, they're actually fine with anything, as long as there is a female CEO.
I've missed your charming delusions.
You don't think it's weird she hasn't said anything about them since 2021?
Considering that OnlyFans was actually busted for selling CP in 2022?
I think it's weird that you said that OnlyFans 'gets a pass' when it doesn't. In fact, the only ones who hate OF as much as you are GC people.
Because they think that the 0.01% who earn a lot from it encourage young girls to ruin their lives for what ends up being an average of $10 a month.
One wonders if you're not just a feminist trying to persuade people of feminist views like "OF is bad" with anti-feminist arguments.
My theory of GC being people who live in the exact opposite of reality continues to work out.
The exploitative whores are not victims. Also, $10 a month is more than the bastards deserve.
So has Pornhub...