I repeat the question from the previous post. What is your plan to keep porn away from kids that also "protects privacy"?
If you don't have one and just crap on the ones other people make then you made it clear that exposing millions of kids to porn is less important to you than being slightly inconvenienced when you want to rub one out.
But even if ID for porn is implemented I can solve your "privacy" problem. Go buy a magazine with cash. I guarantee you the clerk will forget your face in about 20 seconds and any camera footage is wiped weekly if not daily, assuming the cameras work at all.
On the Internet, the responsibility is to properly tag content where appropriate. If porn ends up in a space that is not for porn, that is indeed a problem. Similarly, if a content provider is intentionally advertising to inappropriate consumers, that is also very much a problem. However, if everything is properly labeled, what more can they be held liable for?
An individual breaking the law is the responsibility of the individual. If this individual is a minor, then that responsibility falls on the parents/guardians. In this case, parents have the tools to keep their kids safe. If they choose to ignore these tools and let their kids break the law, I'd almost call that neglect.
I repeat the question from the previous post. What is your plan to keep porn away from kids that also "protects privacy"?
If you don't have one and just crap on the ones other people make then you made it clear that exposing millions of kids to porn is less important to you than being slightly inconvenienced when you want to rub one out.
But even if ID for porn is implemented I can solve your "privacy" problem. Go buy a magazine with cash. I guarantee you the clerk will forget your face in about 20 seconds and any camera footage is wiped weekly if not daily, assuming the cameras work at all.
I already posted it.
Filter it at the network level, It's stupid easy with the tools that are available today.
you dont think the sites run by billion dollar corporations have any responsibility?
On the Internet, the responsibility is to properly tag content where appropriate. If porn ends up in a space that is not for porn, that is indeed a problem. Similarly, if a content provider is intentionally advertising to inappropriate consumers, that is also very much a problem. However, if everything is properly labeled, what more can they be held liable for?
An individual breaking the law is the responsibility of the individual. If this individual is a minor, then that responsibility falls on the parents/guardians. In this case, parents have the tools to keep their kids safe. If they choose to ignore these tools and let their kids break the law, I'd almost call that neglect.