The Leftist "moderator" is a shithead, liar, manipulator, the Lying Media.
Yeah debates are fake. I lose respect for anyone participating in the process, unless their goal is to shit on the institution, make a fool of the host, and teabag their opponent on live TV.
I would have just told her "if you don't stop asking me the same question over and over again, talking over me so I can't be heard me as I attempt to answer it, I'm leaving."
This behavior isn't just an accidental case of rudeness. Not being heard and understood is one of the most aggravating things you can experience when speaking. This is a deliberate tactic to make sure that he can't actually answer while at the same time pissing him off to either fluster him or make him have an outburst.
This is actually exemplary Fortune 500 management-tier bullshit corporate line toeing that this woman is executing here. Just call her a slur if you wanna do that, but don’t misunderstand what and who we’re all up against here
True. I guess his only hope would be that the people who actually watched it would see her badgering him and not letting him answer.
These days, that seems like too high of a burden to ask, unfortunately. I've been in a number of conversations about "the news" with people aggressively defending positions that were based on the headline alone because they hadn't read the article and gotten the salient facts.
Go back to see the response the media had when Trump said in an interview: "Boy, you're a nasty woman". That's how they would have responded.
But of course, like back then, all it would have taken for people to agree with the take would be to actually watch the context and see how obnoxious the twat was being.
The 1/6 videos they deleted counts as evidence. They just destroyed it. They told us we can't see the video because it would out undercovers. They can't even keep their lies straight.
This is nothing new, during Rudy Giuliani's tour across America the Democrat participants were using the exact same tactics. They'd show a video of someone pulling out ballots to scan in secret and the politicians would respond "But where is the evidence?" Poll monitors would testify about being kicked out of the room or seeing some shady shit and the Democrat would reply "You all live in an alternate reality."
For about the last hundred and fifty years in fact.
These people are dishonest enough to claim that labor has value. There is no lie they won't tell. Once someone is identified as a liberal, write them off.
you'd be surprised. while I agree most leftists are brainwashed into groupthink, I know a whopping three leftists in my life who I have been able to convince of certain things. the key is to identify if said leftist is looking for the truth, or if said leftist is looking for the advancement of their side.
"WHY WEREN'T YOU MORE FORCEFUL?! THIS IS WAR! YOU SHOULD HAVE CUT THAT CONSERVATIVE CURRY EATER OFF AS MUCH AS YOU COULD! IF YOU CANT DO WHATS RIGHT, WE MIGHT JUST HAVE TO "FIND" INCRIMINATING MATERIAL IN YOUR FINANCES OR ON YOUR COMPUTER.
She was already doing exactly what the Control Room was telling her to do through her ear piece. That's evidenced by the pause when he brought up the Whitmer "kidnapping" -- they weren't prepared for that and needed a moment to catch up.
Ray Epps is a fed.
The Leftist "moderator" is a shithead, liar, manipulator, the Lying Media.
When the media accuses of "misleading", they mean "leading to a conclusion that is damaging to our agenda".
Yeah debates are fake. I lose respect for anyone participating in the process, unless their goal is to shit on the institution, make a fool of the host, and teabag their opponent on live TV.
All propagandists need to face the wall.
He's CI. That's fed adjacent.
I would have just told her "if you don't stop asking me the same question over and over again, talking over me so I can't be heard me as I attempt to answer it, I'm leaving."
This behavior isn't just an accidental case of rudeness. Not being heard and understood is one of the most aggravating things you can experience when speaking. This is a deliberate tactic to make sure that he can't actually answer while at the same time pissing him off to either fluster him or make him have an outburst.
She clearly diversity hired her way through life.
This is actually exemplary Fortune 500 management-tier bullshit corporate line toeing that this woman is executing here. Just call her a slur if you wanna do that, but don’t misunderstand what and who we’re all up against here
It's a no-win situation, which I think is most of the reason politicians tend to speak with friendly outlets.
True. I guess his only hope would be that the people who actually watched it would see her badgering him and not letting him answer.
These days, that seems like too high of a burden to ask, unfortunately. I've been in a number of conversations about "the news" with people aggressively defending positions that were based on the headline alone because they hadn't read the article and gotten the salient facts.
Go back to see the response the media had when Trump said in an interview: "Boy, you're a nasty woman". That's how they would have responded.
But of course, like back then, all it would have taken for people to agree with the take would be to actually watch the context and see how obnoxious the twat was being.
Yup - it’s very clear her handlers are in her earpiece screaming to just interrupt him and change the topic as much as possible.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
The 1/6 videos they deleted counts as evidence. They just destroyed it. They told us we can't see the video because it would out undercovers. They can't even keep their lies straight.
This is nothing new, during Rudy Giuliani's tour across America the Democrat participants were using the exact same tactics. They'd show a video of someone pulling out ballots to scan in secret and the politicians would respond "But where is the evidence?" Poll monitors would testify about being kicked out of the room or seeing some shady shit and the Democrat would reply "You all live in an alternate reality."
For about the last hundred and fifty years in fact.
These people are dishonest enough to claim that labor has value. There is no lie they won't tell. Once someone is identified as a liberal, write them off.
Katherine Watts traced it to 1913 last I checked.
You can't make a leftist aware of something they don't want to know, and the harder you try, the more agitated they become.
Doublethink is a valued skill for leftist faggots.
you'd be surprised. while I agree most leftists are brainwashed into groupthink, I know a whopping three leftists in my life who I have been able to convince of certain things. the key is to identify if said leftist is looking for the truth, or if said leftist is looking for the advancement of their side.
There are a few exceptions here and there, especially if it was pre-Trump.
NPCCluster B tacticsDon't forget the massive pile of evidence suddenly ceases to exist once its been determined to not be proof
That bitch's boss was probably like
"WHY WEREN'T YOU MORE FORCEFUL?! THIS IS WAR! YOU SHOULD HAVE CUT THAT CONSERVATIVE CURRY EATER OFF AS MUCH AS YOU COULD! IF YOU CANT DO WHATS RIGHT, WE MIGHT JUST HAVE TO "FIND" INCRIMINATING MATERIAL IN YOUR FINANCES OR ON YOUR COMPUTER.
She was already doing exactly what the Control Room was telling her to do through her ear piece. That's evidenced by the pause when he brought up the Whitmer "kidnapping" -- they weren't prepared for that and needed a moment to catch up.
Earpiece guy musta said, "just keep talking." She looks like such an npc.
See also: flat-earthers.
Saw one on another win last night counter every piece of logic and evidence with a diatribe ending in the same two words:
"Not proof."
That clip is like a reddit "debate" in video form.