Righty friend meme about women
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Pretty much, the ones that put accountability on their actions and use reason are in the most loving and honest relationships that even in hard times is a pleasure to be in.
A seemingly-dying breed indeed.
It's why I made one for a tabletop gaming campaign. It's real relaxing to be someone so kind-hearted, such a yamato nadeshiko type, even when she has to fight.
I loved animated Teen Titans Starfire for the same reason.
Get yourself a passport, bro.
You'd be surprised how much of Manosphere Twitter ALSO blames the man for the woman cheating.
No, I'm serious.
No. I wouldn't.
The 'women are wonderful' is an obscenely powerful force.
No, in this case it's more "you weren't alpha enough, hit the gym harder, fatty."
Even when you're fit as a fiddle already. No, apparently you need to tren so hard that your heart is the size of a watermelon.
If it's men's responsibility for a woman to cheat, then it should also be their responsibility to punish them for cheating.
But a lot of people don't want to consider that. We've offloaded the authority for punishment onto greater society, and that failed a fuck-off long time ago.
Some people just need a good punch to the face to smack the bitch out of them. Or several. But that's a conversation most people aren't willing to have.
The "be a better man" preachers ignore that in the old halcyon days of "the patriarchy", most men weren't chadly beasts who kept their women on a tight leash or fit the ideal of the Uber Husband any more than men do now. Women were controlled by social and legal pressure of the greater society. If you told your wife what to do, a (good) woman just did as expected out of social obligation, loyalty, and fear of being destitute on the streets. So men do have to try much harder these days simply because the power dynamic is so out of balance, but it's not a result of individual guys being failures.
I thought it'd be at least "you chose poorly and that's on you".
The problem with them is that they want to doubledown and persist within the shitty modern context without ever trying to change it.
If the kitchen was made more appealing to women, no one would then be able to peddle their ebooks and "war rooms". They are like a symbiote to the kudzu vines of progressive materialism that are strangling our better intentions.
Likewise, you can't live in lala land either. You really have to make a significant change in the world or continue to deal until dealt.
Wouldn't surprise me. I've never trusted Andrew Tate--my gut gives me all sorts of red flags about the man. I can't really explain why.
Tate is part of something called "The War Room." It's headed by a man named Miles Sonkin. Mike Cernovich is also part of it. Murphy (real name Jack Goldman) endorsed Cernovich's "Gorilla Mindset" so they appear to be connected as well.
Plus, Tate's dad was in the CIA. He has Muslim glowie written all over him.
The book where, when Cernovich received any criticism whatsoever, he would respond with a screencap of his sales numbers and ask "How's YOUR book doing?"
Turned me off the man for years.
Tate is a literal pimp and a degenerate.
That dude got astroturfed so fucking hard it's ridiculous. His supposed popularity is fake.
It might have something to do with him publicly bragging about scamming people. I know I trust people just a wee bit less when they do that sort of thing.
Were you here when Jack Murphy got outed as a literal cuck? TheImp was his biggest (IIRC only) defender, oddly enough.
It was pretty funny to see him defend a literal tradcuck. I guess he defended Jack because Jack is a Jew or something. It really didn't make a lot of sense.
Its an extreme version of correcting the loci of control from external to internal.
Most people love to live in the external loci side, because they can blame things on external forces and then not have to accept any responsibility to improve or change based on the outcome. Its a self defeating cycle because it never moves you forward.
Internal forces you to blame yourself, and introspect on what actions you took and the consequences of them. Often times in ways you'd not grasp on surface level thinking. Even when its completely wrong and you straight up had zero control over the outcome, you are still working on yourself regardless.
Its basic psychology, being applied by Assholes who think they are rediscovering the wheel, but its not wrong. And in this case, its almost certainly more helpful. It has nothing to do with the women, because they are prizes to be consumed.
Because if a hoe cheats on you and you just move on because that's what sluts do (it is, no lie there), what did you actually gain? If you put some blame on yourself, now you've got motivation to do a few more reps, to speak a little better, etc. Even if you are in reality, blameless.
I couldn't imagine to live that way. Sounds absolutely horrible.
Its reflexive, so if you don't actively work on it you will just be consumed by it. Its like the fundamental attribution error, something literally everyone just does by retarded brain instinct that we absolutely need to be constantly reminded of and working against.
She was feeling so lonely that she "accidentally" landed on a dick.
"You gonna take advice from somebody who slapped Dee Barnes?"
Too cosmopolitan of a reference?
Yet a sex starved husband who eventually caves in and bangs that hot secretary in his office is the most vile and disloyal creature alive.
Better skip past that 65% of women who have entire harems of single male "friends" then.
Choose 'em by flock lads.
But if his wife is a frigid cunt is still men's fault
Might as well just say, "it's her fault for what she's wearing".