Ever been in a situation where a bunch of girls in a scene start giving you weird looks, ignore you, whisper to each other in front of you, and freeze you out of anything important, all because you said something that made someone feel "uncomfortable"? That's what's happening to Jason Aldean and anyone who gets cancelled. A bunch of people (mostly women and Jews) who get the "ick" about someone and decide they can't hang around the little friend group they call the economy of the United States of America anymore.
Sometimes these situations are resolved when a mean girl pokes a psycho girl a little too many times and they end up brawling in the parking lot where the psycho always wins. It's possible we need a similar solution.
The internet is a great example of how women shouldn't be in positions of power. Sure, some handle it alright, but on average they're much, much worse at wielding power in a fair and pleasant manner than men. It's pretty damn clear.
Transgenders and gays are actually more of the mean-girls type than most women, because they've imbued that "mean girl" behavior into their identity, and pursued as aggressively as only a man can. Match that with the aggression, intimidation, propensity for violence, and disagreeableness that are so common in men rather than women; and they are the meanest bitches in the world.
In addition to that, there's certainly almost no chance that they have anything even resembling healthy and balanced hormone levels.
It's a case of the mean girls finding your presence "uncomfortable" and behaviour gives them the "ick", the jocks back them up using strength by numbers and they all go to Principal Biden, Principal Trudeau or Headmaster Sunak who promptly expels you because everyone deems you a threat to others safety and security.
I have noticed the jocks back this society up as well unfortunately. The girls make the demands and they immediately follow.
Yes and no. The classic jock has been replaced by the preppy type in 6 different social clubs so he can get a good playing job that his tiger mom approves of. There was even a book about that phenomenon and the changes in education from the 80s onwards. That said, lots of former jocks fit the stereotype of getting fat and following the rules blindly. Normies gotta normie. So, yes and no. The old school dudes who played for fun and then went on with their lives don't really exist, at least not in large numbers.
Those are usually basketball or soccer players. Aka sports that require degrees in theater.
As opposed to... what? The NFL having LGBT patches and kneeling for black lives matter? Only hockey and MMA fighters seem to have the balls to resist cultural degradation. MLB players did too, for a time, but I have been told they have been giving in.
Honestly, I only watch fighting sports so I wouldn't know. Has the NFL gotten that bad?
Yes. Yes it has. Progressive commercials where they mock their viewers, progressive half time shows, pink jerseys for breast cancer, a couple minutes of plays for several minutes of commercials, dumbed down plays, and the aforementioned lgbt/ black lives matter. Even some of the normies have noticed, friends of mine call it the "National Felon League" and have switched to college ball. Still a lot of normies watch it though, but there has been enough of a drop in viewers that even South Park had mocked the NFL.
We absolutely do.
We live in what amounts to a matriarchal tyranny, despite it not being entirely run by women.
I have a longer discussion on this about how authoritarian systems fundamentally always seek to disempower and de-individuate men, thus creating a maximized hypergamy, where the tyrant is effectively always cucking the men below him, and creating a social structure that secures his power and status to himself, and around himself, while fulfilling women's need for provision, protection, and status securing.
The one specific difference is that women are involved in the political process (which is not the norm in history), and as a result our tyrannical system has developed feminine methods of coercion: reputation destruction, social ostracism, receptive sexual degeneracy, obsession with youth, obsession with material reward, etc.
There are so many women involved in the political process, and so many of them have entered what I would call "the tyrant's harem" that our institutions have developed feminine methods of violence and coercion. Women don't really solve problems by physical violence, which is why we don't see mass executions, like you might in "Old Left" Communist states. Instead with see deaths from negligence. We abandoned 65,000 American citizens in Afghanistan, the way a ratchet mother might leave her kid home alone to go party. Andrew Cuomo made an insane mistake of putting covid patients in nursing homes that killed (IIRC) 48,000 people, and tried to cover it up; the way a bad mother might bore an unwanted baby in a bathroom and leave it in a dumpster. The media keeps trying to normalize abortion, euthanasia, and population reduction, the way an evil girlfriend might try to convince her boyfriend to comit suicide rather than break up with him. Frankly, the lockdowns are psychologically just this.
This is, unfortunately, why women can offer no solution. They are entirely trapped in this psychological conditioning and abuse. Men, and only men, can actually stand up and say, "I don't give a shit about your reputation destruction garbage because it means nothing to me." Only men can do that. Women are far to dependent on social ordering to rebel against it and utterly overthrow it, but a man can reject it entirely and build a new one by virtuous actions. That is how you build a parallel society / civilization that can survive the collapse of this one.
Great analysis. Unfortunately, the past shows the only real way for this to end is for a nomadic warrior elite to march in and conquer. Otherwise, everything will just keep degrading.
That's really just not true. Elite can be deposed, outflanked, or abandoned. They don't really need to be deposed by nomads. They can be swapped by other elites, or you can build a parallel structure, which is the best way to go for western civilization.
You're not gonna like the nomad option, because our nomads are basically Islamists. As a Dhimmy, you're life would get even worse than it is now. Ask the Spanish.
Well said, especially the opener about it being a matriarchy despite not being all run by women. Look at how woke typed want people to act, it’s always in a female way, regardless of whether the person is literally female. Look at what wokeness promotes and emphasizes, it’s always stuff that can be analogized to the things individual females want on an individual level. It’s all about how things feel rather than how they are, all about social conformity, all about personal attention, all about the mean-girling discussed at length by others in this post.
Right, that's the effect of the Tyrant's Harem that I was referring to. It's placating individual women, in a heavily women-populated environment, that exists as a dependency of the tyrant. The tyrant is not typically a woman, and even in the event that they are, they are typically not doing anything for women as a class, just using women as a harem to create a racket of influence.
Mother of God, they high school all their media and now they're high schooling the world...
Waiting for the whole country to implode (i.e. psychobitch retaliation) is going to leave ghastly blowback on our culture. Hopefully the next society realizes that innocence =/= virtue, and keeps enablers(normies) in check.
No because I am a man and we generally didn't do that kind of stupid "mean girls" type shit. Our shit was often more physical, but then over quickly and everyone moved on and usually got along again after.
In my day we had the honour and etiquette to not actually have the fight at school. You'd get called out and have to meet at the local park at 4pm. Not showing up was the worse thing you could do. Then all you really had to do was give a good account and not cry if you got beaten. As long as you tried you got respect and then left alone. There is no honour any more
I envy you. Working in government is like being stuck in a 90s teen drama. Currently dealing with the fact that my department head doesn't like me because her 3 BFFs (all fucking morons) don't like me. HR is now pissed because department head's one BFF just won Employee of the Quarter... because department head failed to write her up for verbally attacking everyone else in the BFF's office.
I wish I could solve this issue with a few punches to the face. I'm like 90% certain that if I KO'd my department head one time, she would improve both in her intelligence and her problem solving skills.
Exactly. I hate the thought of bullying weaker people, but condescending bitches make me want to stroke out.
What could any reasonable person expect when you allow feminism to become codified in law? People with no responsibility have all the rights.
And it's been in effect for so long that bypassed even the gender barrier. Weak and uninfluential men embrace female ways to behaving as an attempt to get what they need since they lack any male role models thanks to the celebration of the Holy Single Mom.
That's exactly what's happening. It's not even a new thing, it's just magnified and exacerbated by social media--a product that almost uniquely reasonates and amplifies the worst impulses of female social interaction. People talk about "toxic masculinity"? Well social media is the realization of "toxic femininity."
I won't link to wikipedia, but read the page on Nietzsche's view of women. It's fun.
For any other lazy chaps out there who couldn't be bothered to go to wikipedia even if you cared to, here's a nice collection of quotes.
TIL Nietzche was (a much smarter) TheImpossible1.
Welcome to the longhouse
Into the Longhouse you go!
Welcome to my world?
Yeah because I wouldn't kiss their asses and eventually they tried to get a dude to beat me up so I kicked the shit out him. Solved that problem real quick
Thats a very good way to summarize the situation