Climate change hoax debunked: Sea levels are actually falling, not rising
(dailysceptic.org)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Forget sea levels, I'm more concerned with salt levels in the red sea than anything as that seems to be one of the reasons Egypt is no longer the breadbasket it used to be.
The issue with all this 'climate change' shit is the focus is on reduction and allocation of resources than better land management. They say use less power than focus on nuclear and eventually nuclear fusion. They say stop using plastic than proper disposal of plastic. It's the equivalent of the guy that gives up in a hard task then either persevere or find a more effective solution.
Well, in a roundabout way, if that plastic drinking straw had made its way into a "recycling" bin destined for Asia, it would have ended up in the ocean.
So enjoy your paper straw, pleb.
Which wouldn't have happened in the first place if recycling (outside of several metals) wasn't a massive waste of money.
But you can’t discuss practical solutions when they push climate hysteria. Sad to see young people are literally terrified
I don't know how genuinely they are scared and how much is pretending or going along with it on the hopes someone else deals with it.
We have a staggering lack of responsibility in the Western culture currently..
Well that’s true. Young people blowing something out of proportion for attention is as old as time
Can anyone recommend a book or a good documentary debunking climate change hysteria? Also I find it interesting how they constantly talk about clean energy but refuse to push nuclear
Unsettled by Koonin
Link for the lazy
https://www.amazon.com/Unsettled-Climate-Science-Doesnt-Matters-ebook/dp/B08JQKQGD5/ref=nodl_?dplnkId=cdf0407e-0026-40d8-b4e1-a137b5e47eb3
If you'd rather start with short-form content, realclimatescience.com (Tony Heller - https://odysee.com/@TonyHeller:c) is a good place to go. He does discuss the grand narrative conspiracy, but tends to put out shorter videos and articles centering on individual acts of fraud.
Thanks!
I will also say, Tony has a bit of a monotone presentation, but he does break up the rhythm of ruthless assaults on the false presentation of data and the falsification of data with some glorious shitposts, like his dogs playing in the snow during the "warmest winter on record" or rollicking in the green fields during the "most severe drought on record" or what have you.
There are two great documentaries: Climate Hustle 1&2, available on Bitchute. As with all documentaries, they are a bit biased, but given that all the propaganda that you know is biased in the other direction, they're a good antidote.
Actually, while you're at it, you might want to check out Vaxxed 1&2 also available on Bitchute. They both provide striking evidence that vaccines cause autism, among other things.
Thanks!
No see, that's also "climate change" therefore still give us money.
That's why they shifted from "global warming".
Yep. I love the timeline of all of the different terms and predictions since the 60s. I don't doubt that humans could have an effect on the earth but I've always said massive wealth transfer certainly isn't the answer.
Therefore we'll invest in climate startups and then pass climate policies that create markets for the companies we're invested in, while also harming the middle class.
"And here's why that's a bad thing..." Coming soon to Nat Geo.
Pretty much my opinion.
The fact that Obama is willing to own oceanfront property is all you need to know.
Or it's a short long con to get Leftoids to buy the property afterwards, 6 months before the sea swallows it, because the hero worship is that severe it could and would happen and the more narcissistically inclined social media users/influencers would jump at the chance to claim to live in Obama's house.
Shortly before they drowned suddenly.
Yes and no. The land is rising from the compression it suffered by the ice during the last iceage. Which means sea level drops in reference to the land.
Tails they win, heads you lose. Every change in either direction is proof of climate change according to them.
anyone who has seen that photo of the Statue of Liberty from the early 1900s and compared it to any photo of the statue of Liberty from today knows the sea levels are, at the very least, staying completely neutral.
... in Scandinavia. Post-glacial rebound. Same process in Alaska.
For the "modeling" part, I expect the same acuracy as "covid-19 modeling", that is, none.
Because curve-fitting and group-think promoting catastrophic hypothesies that cannot be questioned without accusations of being a "science / climate-change-denier", ostracisation, and funding cuts / grants refusal.
Yep, and they generally do not account for the effects of volcanic activity or other geological events. We still don’t know what climate effects the deep ocean geothermal vents have around the world.
Do you really need more than that? If any of the bullshit they claimed was true, they would never have to fake results.