I would dismiss it out of hand by simple virtue of claiming that Nick Fuentes and Enrique Tarrio are "white-nationalists and neo-fascists." These are the completely unsupported and typical Leftist smears against thorns in their side. Their usage is meaningless, and a note including them is as trustworthy as a $20 in Minneapolis.

As for the Stormer targeting Spanish-speakers, there are plenty of randos you could use simply as foot soldiers for your ideology, and "white supremacists" are regularly fighting people that also target Spanish-speakers, anyway. Why not reach out to them to make them Allies of convenience?

The fact of the matter is that the meaning of "white supremacist" is diluted into meaninglessness when you start to ascribe it to people that are NOT WHITE. Hispanics can have light skin, but they're still not white. Their inclusion into the label of "white," I strongly suspect, is to merge a clearly Hispanic crime percentage into actual white people's much smaller one in order to falsify statistics for political purposes.

Hispanic supremacists have their own supremacist ideology called 'La Raza'.

As for the 'white supremacist' angle, it most likely has to do with Enrique Tarrio's conviction for 'seditious conspiracy' and the January 6th DNC media circus, that the average American is completely indifferent to.

By establishing that there are more hispanic 'white supremacists', the clown circus conviction of Tarrio might become more convincing, and in so doing, lend credence to the January 6th DNC media circus (complete with film directors).

Spaniards are white so of course a Spanish name doesn't mean someone can't be a straight up white supremacist. It's not his name that is at issue though. The dude is pretty dark skinned and is probably mestizo.

I haven't seen anything out of the Proud Boys that is white supremacist. Gavin is a liberal civnat. Fuentes could has been all over the map, working with Kanye as well as Laura Loomer.

The shooter strikes me as a genuine extremist in that he is merely anti-social and lashing out. He also praised Audrey Hale, a tranny and killer of white children. The media will latch onto his usage of Nazi iconography, but that doesn't indicate an ideological belief. It's likely just his way of being anti-social, by embracing the "bad guy" ideology.

Hispanic name

BRUH, LOOK AT HIS FUCKING PHOTOGRAPH.

There's going to be both right and left using community notes, it's just that thanks to autism and facts, they'll be way more useful to us than the left.

As for the content of this note on particular, the Hispanics are more hating of American blacks than the whites SHOULD be. A lot of the other races in America don't have as much tolerance for the chimping out the blacks do so it's no surprise they'd be more in line with what the left imagine 'white supremacists' are in their minds.

Now that any political position to the right of Mao is "white supremacy", of course you'll find "white supremacy" among people of any race that actually know how to think.

They've got a demon by the tail; Left-aligned institutions are learning that non-white ethnicities don't have white guilt and don't give a single flying fuck what their nanny propaganda apparati tell them to think.

And because said non-white tribes and ethnic groups are racist as fuck, now that they're getting attention, they're scrambling like mad to make it so racism is a white-only thing, regardless of all the flaming hoops and chasms they've got to jump through/over to make it work.

Well, work for them, atleast. Who knows how the normies take it.

Like East Asians before them, Hispanics are in the process of having their Diversity Card revoked.

The way I see it, when people think of white people or white nationalism/supremacy, they don't necessarily think of hispanics, so it's unfair to refer to them as white when virtually everyone who looks at a photo of them would consider them hispanic.

Therefore, this Community Notes is bullshit. Along with the one about Congress being able to pass gun control laws, it's easy to see where the future of Community Notes is headed - lies with the reputation of being trustworthy.

Community Notes: Nazis, often considered white supremacist, used black platoons in war. The Afrikaans divisions.

Community Notes: Black Lives Matter, a recognized black supremacist terrorist group, has many white liberal financiers and supporters.

Community Notes: There are vegans who work in slaughterhouses, and carnivores who package "beyond meat" fake meat products.

Unless the post these community notes are adding context to is literally just "they can't be white supremes because they have those fancy names", they are just muddying issues. If that IS the post they're adding context to, then it is indeed fine and helpful, if worded in an overtly biased manner.

When everyone critical of the leftist elite is a white supremacist, anyone can be one. They even called Larry Elder the "black face of white supremacy"

Mexicans do hate blacks and love their huwites, they all wish they look like the white Spaniards in their tv and movies

Source?

Leftists still have access to community notes so they can write this shit and get it approved. Rate the note unhelpful and it can eventually get taken down.

It's true that latinos can be nazis; anyone can agree with nazi ideological principles. Even some black men follow Der Fuhrer, probably for the same reasons white people support BLM: a vague resentment that finds expression in following half-understood ideologies.

However, the term "fascist" has become meaningless, has been meaningless for decades now. It means "anyone whose political orientation I don't like."

Completely accurate. The best part about white nationalism is how inclusive it is.