Nobody gave a shit about drag queens until there was an orchestrated push to get them talking about sex and gay shit in front of children, or stripping and gyrating in front of children.
Pantomime dames have existed forever.
Bugs bunny has been dressing up as a woman for 70 years.
Drag queens have been on TV for as long as I've been alive.
But it isn't the same any more. The tone of the content has shifted away from 'gay men making fun of women' to 'genderqueer weirdos obsessed with getting up close with children.'
Another difference between then and now that I notice- their real name used to be publicized almost as much as their stage name, drawing a distinction between the man and his fictitious female persona. Today, either the stage name is all you see, or they don't even bother with one. This an quiet insistence that the persona is the reality, even though we know it isn't.
Not every 'drag show' is a problem. But the recent trends - that have been promoted by corporate media - those trends need to be stopped dead in their tracks.
Title is wrong, 64-75% of Americans think that drag shows should not be available for children. 25% of US are pro-pedophiles. That is 1 in 4 Americans.
As an experiment we should move them all in one city/ state and see if it goes the way of Sodom and Gomorrah
So is every third world shithole that Western tradcucks like to point to as a moral example that we should aspire to. Every rightoid who spends his time championing the "based Muslims" as an alternative to Western degeneracy will have another think coming if he decides to move his family there.
Galloway doesn't recognize the fact that it's the actions of pedophile trannies that has increased revulsion against such things among conservatives, when they would have been looked at with tolerable disgust in the past, and in his desire to score a political gotcha ignores that 8% of Demographics and 9% of Independents agree.
Also "not sure", which is how I'd answer if there were other people in the room. It's not safe to be openly anti-pedophile in Weimerica. Nobody who's in favor of using drag to groom kids is going to answer "not sure". They're very sure how they feel.
Ideally "They should be allowed for everyone" is the best answer...but that assumes a sane world. It really is sad this is a thing that has to be legislated, regulated, or argued over at all.
Don't bring your kids to "family friendly" drag shows, you sick libfucks.
As other comments pointed out, no one cared, until groomers tried to force it down children's throats, and highly suspect liberal parents (usually mothers) started virtue signaling with their poor kids.
You're missing my point, that in a sane world those people wouldn't try this shit, because people wouldn't put up with it.
Let me put it this way, and I want to be very clear I am not claiming causation: We had less tranny problems when we didn't have/need laws telling them not to drag or trans the kids. Those laws simply weren't necessary, because they didn't yet dare. That's my point. The fact that we need these laws is very damning of our society. We shouldn't need these laws.
Nobody gave a shit about drag queens until there was an orchestrated push to get them talking about sex and gay shit in front of children, or stripping and gyrating in front of children.
Pantomime dames have existed forever.
Bugs bunny has been dressing up as a woman for 70 years.
Drag queens have been on TV for as long as I've been alive.
But it isn't the same any more. The tone of the content has shifted away from 'gay men making fun of women' to 'genderqueer weirdos obsessed with getting up close with children.'
Another difference between then and now that I notice- their real name used to be publicized almost as much as their stage name, drawing a distinction between the man and his fictitious female persona. Today, either the stage name is all you see, or they don't even bother with one. This an quiet insistence that the persona is the reality, even though we know it isn't.
Not every 'drag show' is a problem. But the recent trends - that have been promoted by corporate media - those trends need to be stopped dead in their tracks.
Sounds "impish".
Quite a general statement some might say 🤔
Title is wrong, 64-75% of Americans think that drag shows should not be available for children. 25% of US are pro-pedophiles. That is 1 in 4 Americans.
As an experiment we should move them all in one city/ state and see if it goes the way of Sodom and Gomorrah
I hear Tunisia is a fan of Pedophiles with money.
So is every third world shithole that Western tradcucks like to point to as a moral example that we should aspire to. Every rightoid who spends his time championing the "based Muslims" as an alternative to Western degeneracy will have another think coming if he decides to move his family there.
Pretty sure you can raise your kids as you see for in Muslim countries. More so than here at least.
Yes you're right- forgot about the total ban vote which would obviously include the groomer shows.
And when you include the not sure's that means more than half of Dems could support it.
Galloway doesn't recognize the fact that it's the actions of pedophile trannies that has increased revulsion against such things among conservatives, when they would have been looked at with tolerable disgust in the past, and in his desire to score a political gotcha ignores that 8% of Demographics and 9% of Independents agree.
TBF I missed counting the "ban all drag" vote which brings it up to about 2/3rds.
Also "not sure", which is how I'd answer if there were other people in the room. It's not safe to be openly anti-pedophile in Weimerica. Nobody who's in favor of using drag to groom kids is going to answer "not sure". They're very sure how they feel.
The telling thing is that the independents are largely in the same camp as the Republicans and 4/10 of Democrats want it age gated.
Says that all their messaging that it's 'inclusive and loving letting your kids go to a bunch of pedophilic clowns' is not working.
And what's the only group that leans Democrat? Single women.
And BIPOCs.
Imp, you're using your alt account again...
There's a LOT of groups that lean democrat: Women, blacks, non-Cuban hispanics, the dead...
That’s an odd way of saying a bunch of republicans do too.
Every single person involved should get executed along with all those who voted against banning it
Ideally "They should be allowed for everyone" is the best answer...but that assumes a sane world. It really is sad this is a thing that has to be legislated, regulated, or argued over at all.
Don't bring your kids to "family friendly" drag shows, you sick libfucks.
As other comments pointed out, no one cared, until groomers tried to force it down children's throats, and highly suspect liberal parents (usually mothers) started virtue signaling with their poor kids.
Why would allowing deranged psychopaths access to children be the ideal answer in a sane world any more than it is in clown world?
You're missing my point, that in a sane world those people wouldn't try this shit, because people wouldn't put up with it.
Let me put it this way, and I want to be very clear I am not claiming causation: We had less tranny problems when we didn't have/need laws telling them not to drag or trans the kids. Those laws simply weren't necessary, because they didn't yet dare. That's my point. The fact that we need these laws is very damning of our society. We shouldn't need these laws.
Such a plebeian, next you’ll say you don’t get the artistic brilliance of Spirit Cooking
Ah, that's a classic reference I haven't heard in a while. It's sad to say even those times were less cancerous than what we're seeing today.
When your culture is more satanic than actual satanism. Oof.
Oof indeed.
Oh sorry maybe you know it by it’s other name, Satanic blood rituals
You best start believin' in spiritual war...yer in one!