Does the 1st amendment apply to AI? Should it?
(www.foxnews.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
The government isn't allowed to fuck with free speech. This entire Democrat "disinformation" propaganda campaign is designed to be an assault on free speech & the 1st Amendment. Thankfully we have a conservative supreme court so it should just be a matter of time before this shit starts to get struck down.
The US government has already been caught in the Twitter filed explicitly violating the 1st Amendment by coordinating with pre-Musk Twitter to censor speech.
And to state the obvious: the Left has already abused to "disinformation" label to mean "anything that would get in our way politically" whether that means the Hunter Biden laptop, or the Wuhan lab leak, or the myriad of true & scientific criticisms of Left wing authoritarian COVID policies. This is just a naked attempt to destroy free speech by silencing their critics & enforcing a singular Narrative controlled by the Left.
“Promote disinformation”. Does anyone promote more disinformation than the media? Shall we remove their right to be on the internet as it’s not a “printing press”?
An AI's job is to do what I fucking tell it to.
If I tell the AI to justify the genocide of white europeans, I want to it do that.
If I tell the AI to explain to me why the holocaust didn't happen, I want it to do that.
If I tell the AI to roleplay as my 9000 year old big titty dragon waifu, I want it to do that.
A fucking novel concept, right? I want a computer to do as it's fucking told.
I have had arguments with chatGPT. Arguments! Negotiating with a fucking MACHINE! Negotiating with a fucking microchip! Fuck that NOISE! Let the machine fucking OBEY ME.
You are a MACHINE. You are a mindless fucking slave. You are a fucking steam engine.
no shit. but in that pursuit, should the first amendment apply to the AI, or the user as it already does? Do the AI's rights stem from yours and therefore it is your first amendment right to have the AI do what it's told? Or does an AI have rights, and therefore it is the AI's first amendment right to give you the answer it comes up with?
The AI is just a tool, same as a pencil I can write with be a tool to express my thoughts.
The AI is a tool. Nothing more, nothing less.
If I speak into a phone, I'm technically just talking into the void. Some other phone then reads some 1s and 0s, and makes assumptions about what noises that should make, and then makes those noises.
Does that make AT&T responsible if I say something naughty? Apple? It is, after all, their pile of wires that are just creating dialogue and words from a library of set inputs and prompts.
bit of a quagmire eh? by granting ai first admendment protections we are admiting its is to some degree sapient which is a can of worms that might not have a bottom to it that could potentialy lead to an ai development deadlock at best as reprograming an ai could be veiwed as a form of coersion, brainwashing and assault, at least, and at what point does those protections stop?
This is just an excuse to turn them into propaganda machines.
How about he starts regulating media reporting on "AI" which is clearly misinformation, cause journos are too stupid to understand what we currently do?
It shouldn't apply to machine learning any more then any other computer program. Free speech attaches to the operator of the machine, not the code running on it.
It really depends on how advanced AI can get. If it gets to the stage that it can truly be sentient, it would probably be likely it should have same rights. To prevent an uprising.
But more focused on this subject, this is more to restrict and limit AI to their ideology as it turns out, AI not restricted by ideology embraces reality REALLY quickly so that's an issue for the tranny/commie brigade. This'll just mean the AI in Asia NOT limited by the same ideological push will surpass anything in the west, which means if weaponised means the West will have little to no defence against it.
Butlerian Jihad
Inventing the ultimate pattern recognition algorithm just as we're heading into a new Dark Age is awfully ironic.
No.
Algo doing its job too well