Does the 1st amendment apply to AI? Should it?
(www.foxnews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
no shit. but in that pursuit, should the first amendment apply to the AI, or the user as it already does? Do the AI's rights stem from yours and therefore it is your first amendment right to have the AI do what it's told? Or does an AI have rights, and therefore it is the AI's first amendment right to give you the answer it comes up with?
The AI is just a tool, same as a pencil I can write with be a tool to express my thoughts.
The AI is a tool. Nothing more, nothing less.
If I speak into a phone, I'm technically just talking into the void. Some other phone then reads some 1s and 0s, and makes assumptions about what noises that should make, and then makes those noises.
Does that make AT&T responsible if I say something naughty? Apple? It is, after all, their pile of wires that are just creating dialogue and words from a library of set inputs and prompts.
bit of a quagmire eh? by granting ai first admendment protections we are admiting its is to some degree sapient which is a can of worms that might not have a bottom to it that could potentialy lead to an ai development deadlock at best as reprograming an ai could be veiwed as a form of coersion, brainwashing and assault, at least, and at what point does those protections stop?