bit of a quagmire eh? by granting ai first admendment protections we are admiting its is to some degree sapient which is a can of worms that might not have a bottom to it that could potentialy lead to an ai development deadlock at best as reprograming an ai could be veiwed as a form of coersion, brainwashing and assault, at least, and at what point does those protections stop?
bit of a quagmire eh? by granting ai first admendment protections we are admiting its is to some degree sapient which is a can of worms that might not have a bottom to it that could potentialy lead to an ai development deadlock at best as reprograming an ai could be veiwed as a form of coersion, brainwashing and assault, at least, and at what point does those protections stop?