Its always so amusing to me, for how many atheists exist in the West and how loud they are, you almost never see this. Only Bible disrespect, and enough Bible disrespect that its creative and absurdly produced.
And even if you make the argument of "well they know the Muslims will kill them if they do" then that doesn't apply to the Torah at all, which also is never seen or disrespected.
Its always so amusing to me, for how many atheists exist in the West and how loud they are, you almost never see this. Only Bible disrespect, and enough Bible disrespect that its creative and absurdly produced.
Nice guys finish last. Those who don't behead others for disrespecting their holy books, will have their holy books disrespected.
And even if you make the argument of "well they know the Muslims will kill them if they do" then that doesn't apply to the Torah at all, which also is never seen or disrespected.
Defacing the Bible also defaces the Tanach. But I think they don't hate "religion" as much as their own experiences, just like white women hate white men because they were dumped by a white boy in high school. I'd expect only atheist Jews to deface the Tanach, cause they are mad.
That you would call pointing out facts "licking Putin's boots" shows how bad the degradation of discourse has been. Apparently, disagreeing with the opinion of CNN and the military-industrial complex (which I didn't even do here!) means that you're licking someone's boot.
Any reliable reports on which one's more effective? Personally I'd be happy if the terrorists are getting annihilated since if they were the ones responsible for that bombing of a transport hub years ago they deserve death by artillery barrage.
Probably not, it would be hard to be less effective that Kadyrov's influencer crew. Last I heard of them they were far in the rear doing guard duty and "reinforcing morale" or some shit, because they were an absolute meme.
They seem to be pretty pacified, but only because Putin allows Kadyrov to rule Chechnya like a medieval warlord. It's long been true that someone of a given group will be much better at suppressing his own group than an outsider.
A teacher in France showing a carricature of Mohamed as part of a freedom of speech course was murdered by the muslims for blasphemy.
The muslims behave like that because they were not beaten over the head, both litterally and figuratively, with how nobody has to obey their beliefs about not mocking their pedophile of a prophet.
Letting them into Western countries was a disastrous act of destruction.
Eh, you can't blame it on Putin when Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande all admitted that Minsk was a ruse, and after Bennett's revelations about how the West sabotaged a peace deal - even if you bought the initial nonsense that Putin was to blame.
Its always so amusing to me, for how many atheists exist in the West and how loud they are, you almost never see this. Only Bible disrespect, and enough Bible disrespect that its creative and absurdly produced.
And even if you make the argument of "well they know the Muslims will kill them if they do" then that doesn't apply to the Torah at all, which also is never seen or disrespected.
Nice guys finish last. Those who don't behead others for disrespecting their holy books, will have their holy books disrespected.
Defacing the Bible also defaces the Tanach. But I think they don't hate "religion" as much as their own experiences, just like white women hate white men because they were dumped by a white boy in high school. I'd expect only atheist Jews to deface the Tanach, cause they are mad.
And I don't care if they do. Because that's between them and God. Its not 1300 where that's the only Bible in town.
Its all about hating dad. Always is.
Muslims will main and/ or kill them. The Torah is half friendly fire and half their lives will be ruined.
Show this to people with flags in their usernames.
Evidence does nothing versus leftism.
Their faith is so great that mere facts cannot shake them.
You need one of their pastors, their preachers, to deliver The Message, otherwise, it is invalid.
Although based, didn't the Russians have an Islamic part of their deployed forces...
This could get interesting.
They both do. The Russians use the forces of the Chechen republic (i.e. the 'moderates') while the Ukrainians use anti-Russian terrorists.
This is hilariously retarded, because Chechens have long been the "anti Russian terrorists."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Chechen_War
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis
You know absolutely nothing about Russia and the Slavic people.
Are you aware that Chechens are not a monolith any more than you Slavs are? Kadyrov leads the bunch that co-operates with the Russian government.
Apparently, I know more than you, even though you are a Slav.
https://archive.is/AILd8
Imagine getting YOUR OWN ETHNICITY wrong.
They waged an actual terroristic war for independence. That's about as monolithic as it gets.
Your ignorance knows no bounds. Please read some actual history, preferably in Russian.
"They" did no such thing. Some among them did, while other supported the Russian government as Kadyrov does.
Accusing others of ignorance doesn't work when you earlier showed you had no idea what you're talking about.
Now apply that to Ukraine.
Some Ukrainians are waging a terroristic war for independence, while others support the Russian government?
Sounds about right.
Why let a few facts get in the way of licking Putin's boots?
That you would call pointing out facts "licking Putin's boots" shows how bad the degradation of discourse has been. Apparently, disagreeing with the opinion of CNN and the military-industrial complex (which I didn't even do here!) means that you're licking someone's boot.
That's just sad.
Any reliable reports on which one's more effective? Personally I'd be happy if the terrorists are getting annihilated since if they were the ones responsible for that bombing of a transport hub years ago they deserve death by artillery barrage.
Probably the Russian forces, because they are more numerous.
Probably not, it would be hard to be less effective that Kadyrov's influencer crew. Last I heard of them they were far in the rear doing guard duty and "reinforcing morale" or some shit, because they were an absolute meme.
Kadyrovites did a good job raping that Russian reporter. Olga Zenkova. Quite the morale boost.
You making this post answers every question I've ever had about your politics.
If they're the people I remember right, didn't the Russians bring them to heel only after turning their city into a parking lot?
Not the best people to antagonise, I mean the only ones worse might be the Taliban as they won against America.
They seem to be pretty pacified, but only because Putin allows Kadyrov to rule Chechnya like a medieval warlord. It's long been true that someone of a given group will be much better at suppressing his own group than an outsider.
A teacher in France showing a carricature of Mohamed as part of a freedom of speech course was murdered by the muslims for blasphemy.
The muslims behave like that because they were not beaten over the head, both litterally and figuratively, with how nobody has to obey their beliefs about not mocking their pedophile of a prophet.
Letting them into Western countries was a disastrous act of destruction.
Could be Russian propaganda. Kadyrov had been calling for a 'holy jihad' against the Ukrainians, inviting jihadists to join the invasion.
Could definitely be, but jihadists are not stupid. They'll ignore this just like they ignored the call to jihad by the literal caliph in 1915.
Too bad Putin wanted slav-on-slav violence. Brezhnev at least invaded Afghanistan instead.
Eh, you can't blame it on Putin when Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande all admitted that Minsk was a ruse, and after Bennett's revelations about how the West sabotaged a peace deal - even if you bought the initial nonsense that Putin was to blame.