That's really it, and they won't do it. Highest chance of that would be rural USA and I'm not sure they would even protest enough there.
They wouldn't even have to protest. Just quit sending all the kids to school until everyone who had knowledge of this event and said nothing is dismissed. But they won't because they can't give up their daycare. This being the UK too, I bet they'd just start arresting people for not sending kids to school.
Shame Fox News is controlled opposition and still pretends anal sex is a thing, it’s physically impossible for gay people to have sex, otherwise they would be straight, changing holes and bastardizing language doesn’t make it to sexual intercourse.
Controversial take, but a correct one. Calling sodomy "anal sex" is like calling masturbation "hand sex" lol. It's a bastardization of language. Just an old enough bastardization that most people have internalized it.
Technically the legal definition of rape says you can’t be forced to penetrate someone, but the unwilling penetration of any orifice with a penis is still considered rape, this is a conflation or rape and sex as sex itself is not the only definition of rape nor has it ever been.
I agree with this line of thinking. Sex is vaginal sex, anything else is a "sex act" or any other euphemism. "Gender" should not be asked for on answer forms unless that is specifically what they are researching, only "sex" should. And your first name is your "Christian name" (I don't know if this was a thing outside of the UK). Bring it all back!
Retard, define sexual intercourse. No one said that sodomy stops being sodomy when a man and woman do it. Decondition from the cognitive dissonance you clearly have.
but funny how no one can be converted to 1 sexuality or the other. but your kind are insistent that you can "fix" someone who's gay... but yet it never works.
but my god man you sound just delusional as the teachers in that school
Why do you think that 'sex' is called 'sex', my man? A good case can be made that two men and two women cannot engage in sex, because the act of supposed sex does not involve the sexual organs of both partners.
Under this framework, 'gay' (homosexual) is not a legitimate category. Just because someone desires to do stuff with the same sex, does not make you anything but 'someone who desires that'. Well, people have all sorts of sinful desires, Christians believe.
tell them what they're doing isn't considered sex!...
I made an argument, and you don't seem to have a counterpoint.
because we say so. even if they don't get turned on by the opposite sex. we can fix them and make them normal! that'll work!
It worked for millennia, and there is no reason why it should not 'work' now. I don't care what "turns" someone on, nor do I care about people's happiness.
Before you bring out all the 'isms' against me, I am bisexual. Unfortunately, the spread of acceptance of homosexuality seems to be correlated with the absolute destruction of society. So yeah, I'd rather that it not be pushed in everyone's faces, particularly the faces of children the activists seem to be most interested in grooming.
but big ups for admitting your bi in a very hateful place for gays.
You lost? I'm the founder of this place.
it hasn't worked. so many in the closet gays back then, so many were miserable going into loveless relationships, fake happy families. and some of them couldn't take it and ended themselves.
Great, but it seems that suicides are much higher now than in the past. It seems that sowing gender confusion among children (and I'm not saying you support this) does not do much for lowering suicides, quite the contrary. What were they doing right that people now don't?
i think having moderate family views. and not pushing for this actual degeneracy could work! and without the anti gay stuff. HELL! have you even heard of gays against groomers?
Yeah, big fan. I'm also happy that nearly all of the "conservative gays" got behind the Parents' Rights Bill in Florida.
you could've been straight, gay, pansexual...
No one is 'pansexual', because that is not a thing.
i judge people by their actions and not some irrelevant trait they may or may not have.
And so do I. This does not prevent me from seeing that things are going very much in the wrong direction. There are many good gay people, like Glenn Greenwald, and David Starkey, and Dave Rubin, but that does not require one to approve of homosexuality.
and judging by you... you seem like an awful gay person and and awful straight person to boot!
All this because I explained Thomistic ideas to you? I bet you can't even tell me why exactly I'm suddenly 'awful'.
i did, you just don't consider it to be sex because you base your logic off of homophobic laws.
What laws? I explained why a good argument can be made why it's not sex, and you did not dispute, let alone refute, the arguments.
cool it doesn't exist because you don't believe in it.
I just explained it to you. Not sure why you're resistant to logic. It doesn't fulfill the final cause of sex, and can therefore be argued to not be sex.
with sexuality, you have physical proof. so you can't really much make that argument, because you have to literally tell people who can't change how they feel to... change how they feel to conform to your wants/desires.
The issue is that with all the glorification of homosexuality, and the recruitment/grooming, vastly larger numbers of people now claim to be bisexual or homosexual. So it's clear that people are changing due to incentives.
Sex has very specific conditions that have to be met to be sex. That’s why it’s defined as sexual intercourse and sexual reproduction, as other orifices don’t allow sexual reproduction or intercourse they do not meet the definition of sex. Retards and hedonists have conflated any stimulation of sexual organs as sex to normalize their degeneracy.
Fellatio is oral stimulation of sexual organs. The fact is even today despite the social engineering the majority of straight people don’t engage in sodomy. The std transmission rates and lack of hiv also support this reality. I have never felt the urge to fuck a butthole as is the same with sane people who don’t want easily spread diseases due to micro abrasions.
you say fellatio like it's fine but treat anal like it's a sin.
Fellatio has an egregiously lower risk of disease than sodomy. You would have to be retarded to not hold them to different standards.
still not all the different from sex in a vagina.
Tell that to HIV
also... wear-wear a fucking condom. cause you can fuck only pussies from dusk till dawn! and still get an std/hiv... you asshole
Show me any study that has the same transference rates of stds from anal as vaginal. Almost like vaginas were… biologically formed to compensate for sexual intercourse and buttholes were… biologically formed for the expulsion of waste.
which is why for anal or vaginal sex you need to wear a condom.
No, actually you don’t, the biggest reason men wear a condom for sexual intercourse is to prevent pregnancy, while the main reason fags wear condoms is to prevent micro abrasions.
even if you do have a case to be made that fucking someone up the ass! has a higher risk of std's. you can still contract it anyways via vaginal sex!
The rate of transference isn’t even debatable, buttholes were not designed for penises, and the main reason female pornstars get HIV is from doing anal intercourse.
so it makes no difference if one or the other has a lower/higher change of getting something nasty.
If that’s the case then the next time you have surgery you won’t care if they sanitize the tools?
You don’t agree with basic biology defined in a dead language so the definition doesn’t change because it has a specific purpose? Is a pulmonary embolism the same as cardiac arrest and should we treat them the same because simpletons can’t understand the difference or even the base reason for why we use dead languages or is it only because fags cry about it?
I still can't believe that drag queen story hour is an actual thing. You couldn't create a better environment for degenerates to groom children if you tried. Yet we're not only supposed to act like it's normal. We're supposed to celebrate it like it's a positive thing.
Find this faggot and beat the living shit out of him
The representative also alleged that one group of students was taught how to perform anal and oral sex. Another group was shown how skin grafts are taken from a patient’s arm to create an artificial penis for a transgender man.
Cox said some students are too "traumatized" to talk with their parents about what transpired.
The natural consequences of being a people who glorify their enslavement to monarchs.
They repeatedly drove people who wanted liberty from their country, generation after generation - then picked fights with them and lost. Every genetic line of free men has left britain. Now only serfs remain.
Their whole existance as a nation and people has been cucked. They're already dead.
What nonsense. I assume you think the genocidal regime of the French Revolution, or the pipsqueaks of the Great Rebellion were those who 'wanted liberty'?
England was the envy of the world in the 19th century, under the monarchy. It was the monarchy that brought civilization, roads and civic institutions to the farthest places in the globe. It was the monarchy that extirpated slavery. And it was the monarchy that ended Hitler's regime. And in fact, when the monarchy had a good deal more power than it has today. Don't blame today's oligarchic collectivism on a powerless monarchy.
That's really it, and they won't do it. Highest chance of that would be rural USA and I'm not sure they would even protest enough there.
They wouldn't even have to protest. Just quit sending all the kids to school until everyone who had knowledge of this event and said nothing is dismissed. But they won't because they can't give up their daycare. This being the UK too, I bet they'd just start arresting people for not sending kids to school.
Just one guy with a shovel.
Shame Fox News is controlled opposition and still pretends anal sex is a thing, it’s physically impossible for gay people to have sex, otherwise they would be straight, changing holes and bastardizing language doesn’t make it to sexual intercourse.
Controversial take, but a correct one. Calling sodomy "anal sex" is like calling masturbation "hand sex" lol. It's a bastardization of language. Just an old enough bastardization that most people have internalized it.
So then is anal rape still rape?
I've seen feminists claim "men can't be raped"...
Technically the legal definition of rape says you can’t be forced to penetrate someone, but the unwilling penetration of any orifice with a penis is still considered rape, this is a conflation or rape and sex as sex itself is not the only definition of rape nor has it ever been.
I agree with this line of thinking. Sex is vaginal sex, anything else is a "sex act" or any other euphemism. "Gender" should not be asked for on answer forms unless that is specifically what they are researching, only "sex" should. And your first name is your "Christian name" (I don't know if this was a thing outside of the UK). Bring it all back!
Oh no, a person who couldn’t pass basic biology appear. Tell me genius, what is sexual intercourse or sex?
Retard, define sexual intercourse. No one said that sodomy stops being sodomy when a man and woman do it. Decondition from the cognitive dissonance you clearly have.
I’m assuming you’re a blithering retard who can’t even read
Why do you think that 'sex' is called 'sex', my man? A good case can be made that two men and two women cannot engage in sex, because the act of supposed sex does not involve the sexual organs of both partners.
Under this framework, 'gay' (homosexual) is not a legitimate category. Just because someone desires to do stuff with the same sex, does not make you anything but 'someone who desires that'. Well, people have all sorts of sinful desires, Christians believe.
I made an argument, and you don't seem to have a counterpoint.
It worked for millennia, and there is no reason why it should not 'work' now. I don't care what "turns" someone on, nor do I care about people's happiness.
Before you bring out all the 'isms' against me, I am bisexual. Unfortunately, the spread of acceptance of homosexuality seems to be correlated with the absolute destruction of society. So yeah, I'd rather that it not be pushed in everyone's faces, particularly the faces of children the activists seem to be most interested in grooming.
You lost? I'm the founder of this place.
Great, but it seems that suicides are much higher now than in the past. It seems that sowing gender confusion among children (and I'm not saying you support this) does not do much for lowering suicides, quite the contrary. What were they doing right that people now don't?
Yeah, big fan. I'm also happy that nearly all of the "conservative gays" got behind the Parents' Rights Bill in Florida.
No one is 'pansexual', because that is not a thing.
And so do I. This does not prevent me from seeing that things are going very much in the wrong direction. There are many good gay people, like Glenn Greenwald, and David Starkey, and Dave Rubin, but that does not require one to approve of homosexuality.
All this because I explained Thomistic ideas to you? I bet you can't even tell me why exactly I'm suddenly 'awful'.
What laws? I explained why a good argument can be made why it's not sex, and you did not dispute, let alone refute, the arguments.
I just explained it to you. Not sure why you're resistant to logic. It doesn't fulfill the final cause of sex, and can therefore be argued to not be sex.
The issue is that with all the glorification of homosexuality, and the recruitment/grooming, vastly larger numbers of people now claim to be bisexual or homosexual. So it's clear that people are changing due to incentives.
Sex has very specific conditions that have to be met to be sex. That’s why it’s defined as sexual intercourse and sexual reproduction, as other orifices don’t allow sexual reproduction or intercourse they do not meet the definition of sex. Retards and hedonists have conflated any stimulation of sexual organs as sex to normalize their degeneracy.
You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.
Yes, you blithering retard
No, you blithering retard, it just makes it sodomy, not sex
Is her butthole a different human or are you a blithering retard?
I’m hoping you’re a troll, because the cognitive dissonance and stupidity coming from you is well… pathetic
Fellatio is oral stimulation of sexual organs. The fact is even today despite the social engineering the majority of straight people don’t engage in sodomy. The std transmission rates and lack of hiv also support this reality. I have never felt the urge to fuck a butthole as is the same with sane people who don’t want easily spread diseases due to micro abrasions.
Oral sex is unnatural, in the Thomistic Aristotelian sense that it does not serve the purpose of sex. It is sodomy just like anal sex is.
Fellatio has an egregiously lower risk of disease than sodomy. You would have to be retarded to not hold them to different standards.
Tell that to HIV
Show me any study that has the same transference rates of stds from anal as vaginal. Almost like vaginas were… biologically formed to compensate for sexual intercourse and buttholes were… biologically formed for the expulsion of waste.
No, actually you don’t, the biggest reason men wear a condom for sexual intercourse is to prevent pregnancy, while the main reason fags wear condoms is to prevent micro abrasions.
The rate of transference isn’t even debatable, buttholes were not designed for penises, and the main reason female pornstars get HIV is from doing anal intercourse.
If that’s the case then the next time you have surgery you won’t care if they sanitize the tools?
You don’t agree with basic biology defined in a dead language so the definition doesn’t change because it has a specific purpose? Is a pulmonary embolism the same as cardiac arrest and should we treat them the same because simpletons can’t understand the difference or even the base reason for why we use dead languages or is it only because fags cry about it?
If that were MY kid I’d buy him a PS5 and take him wakeboarding as a reward. Good lad
I still can't believe that drag queen story hour is an actual thing. You couldn't create a better environment for degenerates to groom children if you tried. Yet we're not only supposed to act like it's normal. We're supposed to celebrate it like it's a positive thing.
Epstein and Skippy Pedosta did.
Who's worse, the troon reading, the host of the event, or the parent bringing their kid to it?
I'm assuming no two parents discuss this and decide it's a good idea.
Find this faggot and beat the living shit out of him
I wouldn't have talked about anything like this with my parents had this happened back then either, even if it wasn't due to trauma.
They denied 73 genders. The other 66 were okay, but that's over half of them denied!
The natural consequences of being a people who glorify their enslavement to monarchs.
They repeatedly drove people who wanted liberty from their country, generation after generation - then picked fights with them and lost. Every genetic line of free men has left britain. Now only serfs remain.
Their whole existance as a nation and people has been cucked. They're already dead.
What nonsense. I assume you think the genocidal regime of the French Revolution, or the pipsqueaks of the Great Rebellion were those who 'wanted liberty'?
England was the envy of the world in the 19th century, under the monarchy. It was the monarchy that brought civilization, roads and civic institutions to the farthest places in the globe. It was the monarchy that extirpated slavery. And it was the monarchy that ended Hitler's regime. And in fact, when the monarchy had a good deal more power than it has today. Don't blame today's oligarchic collectivism on a powerless monarchy.
You're not making a good case.
Not to crazy people.
I agree, you're making a great case for you and your multiple personalities, all of which are sane.
I personally think it was the Boy Scouts and roast beef that won both world wars (and one World Cup).
The leftovers of the british population are the serfs who let themselves be ruled.
Literally no, Churchill was running england then and the Russians would have taken Germany if the US hadn't met them there.
Are you a filthy brit or just roleplaying?
They let women vote.