Shame Fox News is controlled opposition and still pretends anal sex is a thing, it’s physically impossible for gay people to have sex, otherwise they would be straight, changing holes and bastardizing language doesn’t make it to sexual intercourse.
Controversial take, but a correct one. Calling sodomy "anal sex" is like calling masturbation "hand sex" lol. It's a bastardization of language. Just an old enough bastardization that most people have internalized it.
Technically the legal definition of rape says you can’t be forced to penetrate someone, but the unwilling penetration of any orifice with a penis is still considered rape, this is a conflation or rape and sex as sex itself is not the only definition of rape nor has it ever been.
I agree with this line of thinking. Sex is vaginal sex, anything else is a "sex act" or any other euphemism. "Gender" should not be asked for on answer forms unless that is specifically what they are researching, only "sex" should. And your first name is your "Christian name" (I don't know if this was a thing outside of the UK). Bring it all back!
Retard, define sexual intercourse. No one said that sodomy stops being sodomy when a man and woman do it. Decondition from the cognitive dissonance you clearly have.
but funny how no one can be converted to 1 sexuality or the other. but your kind are insistent that you can "fix" someone who's gay... but yet it never works.
but my god man you sound just delusional as the teachers in that school
Why do you think that 'sex' is called 'sex', my man? A good case can be made that two men and two women cannot engage in sex, because the act of supposed sex does not involve the sexual organs of both partners.
Under this framework, 'gay' (homosexual) is not a legitimate category. Just because someone desires to do stuff with the same sex, does not make you anything but 'someone who desires that'. Well, people have all sorts of sinful desires, Christians believe.
tell them what they're doing isn't considered sex!...
I made an argument, and you don't seem to have a counterpoint.
because we say so. even if they don't get turned on by the opposite sex. we can fix them and make them normal! that'll work!
It worked for millennia, and there is no reason why it should not 'work' now. I don't care what "turns" someone on, nor do I care about people's happiness.
Before you bring out all the 'isms' against me, I am bisexual. Unfortunately, the spread of acceptance of homosexuality seems to be correlated with the absolute destruction of society. So yeah, I'd rather that it not be pushed in everyone's faces, particularly the faces of children the activists seem to be most interested in grooming.
Sex has very specific conditions that have to be met to be sex. That’s why it’s defined as sexual intercourse and sexual reproduction, as other orifices don’t allow sexual reproduction or intercourse they do not meet the definition of sex. Retards and hedonists have conflated any stimulation of sexual organs as sex to normalize their degeneracy.
Shame Fox News is controlled opposition and still pretends anal sex is a thing, it’s physically impossible for gay people to have sex, otherwise they would be straight, changing holes and bastardizing language doesn’t make it to sexual intercourse.
Controversial take, but a correct one. Calling sodomy "anal sex" is like calling masturbation "hand sex" lol. It's a bastardization of language. Just an old enough bastardization that most people have internalized it.
So then is anal rape still rape?
I've seen feminists claim "men can't be raped"...
Technically the legal definition of rape says you can’t be forced to penetrate someone, but the unwilling penetration of any orifice with a penis is still considered rape, this is a conflation or rape and sex as sex itself is not the only definition of rape nor has it ever been.
I agree with this line of thinking. Sex is vaginal sex, anything else is a "sex act" or any other euphemism. "Gender" should not be asked for on answer forms unless that is specifically what they are researching, only "sex" should. And your first name is your "Christian name" (I don't know if this was a thing outside of the UK). Bring it all back!
Oh no, a person who couldn’t pass basic biology appear. Tell me genius, what is sexual intercourse or sex?
Retard, define sexual intercourse. No one said that sodomy stops being sodomy when a man and woman do it. Decondition from the cognitive dissonance you clearly have.
Why do you think that 'sex' is called 'sex', my man? A good case can be made that two men and two women cannot engage in sex, because the act of supposed sex does not involve the sexual organs of both partners.
Under this framework, 'gay' (homosexual) is not a legitimate category. Just because someone desires to do stuff with the same sex, does not make you anything but 'someone who desires that'. Well, people have all sorts of sinful desires, Christians believe.
I made an argument, and you don't seem to have a counterpoint.
It worked for millennia, and there is no reason why it should not 'work' now. I don't care what "turns" someone on, nor do I care about people's happiness.
Before you bring out all the 'isms' against me, I am bisexual. Unfortunately, the spread of acceptance of homosexuality seems to be correlated with the absolute destruction of society. So yeah, I'd rather that it not be pushed in everyone's faces, particularly the faces of children the activists seem to be most interested in grooming.
Sex has very specific conditions that have to be met to be sex. That’s why it’s defined as sexual intercourse and sexual reproduction, as other orifices don’t allow sexual reproduction or intercourse they do not meet the definition of sex. Retards and hedonists have conflated any stimulation of sexual organs as sex to normalize their degeneracy.
You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.
Yes, you blithering retard
No, you blithering retard, it just makes it sodomy, not sex
Is her butthole a different human or are you a blithering retard?
I’m hoping you’re a troll, because the cognitive dissonance and stupidity coming from you is well… pathetic