What nonsense. I assume you think the genocidal regime of the French Revolution, or the pipsqueaks of the Great Rebellion were those who 'wanted liberty'?
England was the envy of the world in the 19th century, under the monarchy. It was the monarchy that brought civilization, roads and civic institutions to the farthest places in the globe. It was the monarchy that extirpated slavery. And it was the monarchy that ended Hitler's regime. And in fact, when the monarchy had a good deal more power than it has today. Don't blame today's oligarchic collectivism on a powerless monarchy.
What nonsense. I assume you think the genocidal regime of the French Revolution, or the pipsqueaks of the Great Rebellion were those who 'wanted liberty'?
England was the envy of the world in the 19th century, under the monarchy. It was the monarchy that brought civilization, roads and civic institutions to the farthest places in the globe. It was the monarchy that extirpated slavery. And it was the monarchy that ended Hitler's regime. And in fact, when the monarchy had a good deal more power than it has today. Don't blame today's oligarchic collectivism on a powerless monarchy.
You're not making a good case.
Not to crazy people.
I agree, you're making a great case for you and your multiple personalities, all of which are sane.
I personally think it was the Boy Scouts and roast beef that won both world wars (and one World Cup).
The leftovers of the british population are the serfs who let themselves be ruled.
Literally no, Churchill was running england then and the Russians would have taken Germany if the US hadn't met them there.
Are you a filthy brit or just roleplaying?