I do wish this would shock normies into realizing that far-right is nothing but a meaningless insult thrown at heretics, and then cause them take a second look at everyone else who has been identified as a right-wing bogeyman, but they never seem to get it. Yeah it red pills a few people here and there, but the vast majority always fall into the "No I'M not right-wing, you don't have to be right-wing to protect children!" trap.
Same with "I'm not a racist!" and "No we aren't anti-trans, we just don't want drag queens reading to children." Protestors literally said this not long ago.
In 2050 it will be "I'm not anti-MAP, I just don't appreciate my daughter's math teacher showing her how masturbation works until he's gotten her signed form of consent."
Yes, but it's also important to underline that you definitely don't have to be right-wing to oppose pedos.
It's the way of the world that 50% of people will reflexively oppose any position that is associated with the other side. Which is why most people here opposed AOC when she said that Amazon should not get special treatment and a privileged tax deal to come to New York, even though she was 100% right.
So I try to make it as comfortable as possible for people on the left to take the correct position.
Which is why most people here opposed AOC when she said that Amazon should not get special treatment and a privileged tax deal to come to New York, even though she was 100% right.
I mean, I think most people can recognize "give an inch, lose a mile" from having learned the hard way if not how obvious it is. That's why even when they are right, people don't want to support them as their solution is also a problem.
The same way most people can see the obvious problems with Cops in this country, from the gungho militarization to the inability to have any accountability. But if you even begin to agree with the ACABs on those points, they will make the situation far worse.
I mean, I think most people can recognize "give an inch, lose a mile" from having learned the hard way if not how obvious it is. That's why even when they are right, people don't want to support them as their solution is also a problem.
And I actually agree. In retrospect, I would not have supported homosexual marriage, because it just moved the ball further down the field. But the art of politics is deciding which issues are ones where you're moving the ball further down the field for someone else. I don't see how that would be the case here.
Also, I'll just add that most people did not make this argument, but rather 'THIS MEANS FEWER JOBS FOR NEW YORK'. Which is true, but not an argument in favor of special tax privileges for Amazon.
The same way most people can see the obvious problems with Cops in this country, from the gungho militarization to the inability to have any accountability. But if you even begin to agree with the ACABs on those points, they will make the situation far worse.
Depending on the race of the person shot, I'd say there is too much 'accountability', or rather railroading.
Almost anything AOC would do would simply put more laws on the book that would be loopholed for corporations and then exist entirely to punish small businesses and drive prices up for the rest of us. Very little actual damage would be done to hurt those who actually do need to be reined in.
I'll just add that most people did not make this argument
I'm aware. I think its become reflexive, wherein they know subconsciously the problem and immediately just jump to resist. In this time they are quite susceptible to the first explanation they see, which is always dumb shit from Right wing Grifters, and they end up sounding stupider than they are. T_D was filled with "right, with the wrong understanding" for years because of it.
I'd say there is too much 'accountability', or rather railroading
In the majority of cases, there really isn't. Chauvin was surprisingly not only because of how laughable the case against him was, but that he was a very rare exception. Even the "dindu nuffins" getting shot isn't enough to break their circled wagons most of the time.
Which is why most people here opposed AOC when she said that Amazon should not get special treatment and a privileged tax deal to come to New York, even though she was 100% right.
Indeed it does. The conservative media sphere is heavily invested in cultivating that type of brainless contrarianism. A lot of people on the right also have a huge ideological blind spot for problems stemming from corporations. They've spent their political lives believing that government attacks on private sector market freedom are the defining political conflict. They have a lot of cognitive dissonance to work through before they can see that "woke" shit comes from wealthy private sector actors as much as anything and understand the implications of that.
You know, I don't even think the problem in England is the migrants. I think it's the type of migrants. I think all the foreign countries are laughing hysterically and sending us all their criminals and pedophiles. Meanwhile, the British elite don't have any problem with that, because they are into that shit.
Because this kind of behavior CERTAINLY doesn't happen in Africa, where babies are raped because of a rumor that raping a virgin cures AIDS, and in the Middle East, where they worship a pedophile and the US Army doccumented mass child rape as being unpersicutable for risk of destroying the region's pilars of stability.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen, I'm saying we're specifically recruiting them in particular.
Believe it or not, there's a reason why on muslim pedophile appealed for refugee status. It's because his child sex conviction would see him killed, not even by the state, but by his own local community back in Pakistan.
Additionally, I'll remind you that the Afghan tradition of Bacha Bazi was stopped by the Taliban for being unislamic, and they executed anyone engaging in it.
And yeah, there are roving criminal bandits that will rape babies. Those people are also likely to be lynched, beaten to death, stoned to death, or burned alive with a car tire in those same communities.
That's because those are civilized people living in civilized countries, where as our savage barbarian elites keep importing them and making you pay for it; while all those places are just glad to be rid of them.
there are roving criminal bandits that will rape babies. Those people are also likely to be lynched, beaten to death, stoned to death, or burned alive with a car tire in those same communities.
Sure, if those babies are being raised to be Muslim.
Muslims do not consider us infidels human so we're all just dogmeat to them, and raping our children is the equivalent of what we would call "bestiality."
Even though Islam is Supremacist, this is still not considered normal or acceptable behavior. Even if we were to call it bestiality, that's still a crime.
They're less pakistani communities, and more just pedo communities.
True, I'd say the biggest problem is the English "stiff upper lip" mentality. They've started slowly moving into "Lay back and think of Ukraine". You gotta have someone get mad and throw a punch.
When you start the thread defending pedos, it's a bit too late to try to pretend to be sane later on.
Here's me rewriting your comment in a way that is sane.
This is obviously really bad, but we need to keep our eyes on the ball. The proposed 'misogyny' law would do immeasurable and permanent damage to everyone's rights in the UK, compared to which an underage girl being solicited is of comparatively minor significance. And I have noticed a pattern where such incidents are used to enact sweeping legislation that create wrongs far greater than the original wrong they were supposedly meant to address.
Due to the influence of feminist activists in both parties, the two party system has failed to actually represent ordinary people rather than activism. So it's up to us to show that we are not happy with the way things are going.
You may judge my comment based on my reputation, but that's not the case at all. If this law passes, all that's necessary for your freedom to be taken away is an unsubstantiated accusation that a woman makes.
The migrant rape gangs were ignored for the last decade and now it's finally getting mainstream attention... curiously coinciding with a push to pass some absurd and severe "anti-misogyny" laws...
The correct course of action would be to send all the migrants back to the 3rd world, but because it's Britain, they're trying to build bridges, not walls, so they build tiny walls on all their bridges to stop the van attacks. Likewise, criminalizing staring will not be enforced on migrants in no-go zones.
I do wish this would shock normies into realizing that far-right is nothing but a meaningless insult thrown at heretics, and then cause them take a second look at everyone else who has been identified as a right-wing bogeyman, but they never seem to get it. Yeah it red pills a few people here and there, but the vast majority always fall into the "No I'M not right-wing, you don't have to be right-wing to protect children!" trap.
Same with "I'm not a racist!" and "No we aren't anti-trans, we just don't want drag queens reading to children." Protestors literally said this not long ago.
In 2050 it will be "I'm not anti-MAP, I just don't appreciate my daughter's math teacher showing her how masturbation works until he's gotten her signed form of consent."
Normies are like a herd, they stay with the herd no matter what and it's only when a leader pushes forward do they follow
It's why authorities and leftists try to stop any potential leaders gaining prominence because if they gain momentum they're fucked.
Yes, but it's also important to underline that you definitely don't have to be right-wing to oppose pedos.
It's the way of the world that 50% of people will reflexively oppose any position that is associated with the other side. Which is why most people here opposed AOC when she said that Amazon should not get special treatment and a privileged tax deal to come to New York, even though she was 100% right.
So I try to make it as comfortable as possible for people on the left to take the correct position.
I mean, I think most people can recognize "give an inch, lose a mile" from having learned the hard way if not how obvious it is. That's why even when they are right, people don't want to support them as their solution is also a problem.
The same way most people can see the obvious problems with Cops in this country, from the gungho militarization to the inability to have any accountability. But if you even begin to agree with the ACABs on those points, they will make the situation far worse.
And I actually agree. In retrospect, I would not have supported homosexual marriage, because it just moved the ball further down the field. But the art of politics is deciding which issues are ones where you're moving the ball further down the field for someone else. I don't see how that would be the case here.
Also, I'll just add that most people did not make this argument, but rather 'THIS MEANS FEWER JOBS FOR NEW YORK'. Which is true, but not an argument in favor of special tax privileges for Amazon.
Depending on the race of the person shot, I'd say there is too much 'accountability', or rather railroading.
Almost anything AOC would do would simply put more laws on the book that would be loopholed for corporations and then exist entirely to punish small businesses and drive prices up for the rest of us. Very little actual damage would be done to hurt those who actually do need to be reined in.
I'm aware. I think its become reflexive, wherein they know subconsciously the problem and immediately just jump to resist. In this time they are quite susceptible to the first explanation they see, which is always dumb shit from Right wing Grifters, and they end up sounding stupider than they are. T_D was filled with "right, with the wrong understanding" for years because of it.
In the majority of cases, there really isn't. Chauvin was surprisingly not only because of how laughable the case against him was, but that he was a very rare exception. Even the "dindu nuffins" getting shot isn't enough to break their circled wagons most of the time.
Was that here or the subreddit?
It was the subreddit.
But still, negative partisanship is very powerful.
Indeed it does. The conservative media sphere is heavily invested in cultivating that type of brainless contrarianism. A lot of people on the right also have a huge ideological blind spot for problems stemming from corporations. They've spent their political lives believing that government attacks on private sector market freedom are the defining political conflict. They have a lot of cognitive dissonance to work through before they can see that "woke" shit comes from wealthy private sector actors as much as anything and understand the implications of that.
When the societal norm is to endorse evil, being an extremist is a moral good.
"We dont do that in this country, you got to jail".
No they won't. Been an invader in Europe is by itself a jail immune card. Same as the joggers in the US.
Unless an Hitler figure rises to power and take some drastic measures, the West will essentially be another South Africa in the next 20 years.
You know, I don't even think the problem in England is the migrants. I think it's the type of migrants. I think all the foreign countries are laughing hysterically and sending us all their criminals and pedophiles. Meanwhile, the British elite don't have any problem with that, because they are into that shit.
Because this kind of behavior CERTAINLY doesn't happen in Africa, where babies are raped because of a rumor that raping a virgin cures AIDS, and in the Middle East, where they worship a pedophile and the US Army doccumented mass child rape as being unpersicutable for risk of destroying the region's pilars of stability.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen, I'm saying we're specifically recruiting them in particular.
Believe it or not, there's a reason why on muslim pedophile appealed for refugee status. It's because his child sex conviction would see him killed, not even by the state, but by his own local community back in Pakistan.
Additionally, I'll remind you that the Afghan tradition of Bacha Bazi was stopped by the Taliban for being unislamic, and they executed anyone engaging in it.
And yeah, there are roving criminal bandits that will rape babies. Those people are also likely to be lynched, beaten to death, stoned to death, or burned alive with a car tire in those same communities.
That's because those are civilized people living in civilized countries, where as our savage barbarian elites keep importing them and making you pay for it; while all those places are just glad to be rid of them.
They don't have a problem with raping little girls.
Correct, but at least they banned raping little boys. That's progress, right?
Wasn't the CIA giving them viagra so they could perform while raping little boys? The good guys!
They do if their dad didn't "consent" to it. Which is at least better than what's happening in England I guess.
Sure, if those babies are being raised to be Muslim.
Muslims do not consider us infidels human so we're all just dogmeat to them, and raping our children is the equivalent of what we would call "bestiality."
Even though Islam is Supremacist, this is still not considered normal or acceptable behavior. Even if we were to call it bestiality, that's still a crime.
They're less pakistani communities, and more just pedo communities.
It's not the problem, but it's absolutely a problem.
England has a shitton of problems, one of which is migrants.
True, I'd say the biggest problem is the English "stiff upper lip" mentality. They've started slowly moving into "Lay back and think of Ukraine". You gotta have someone get mad and throw a punch.
Yes, Islamic migrants. I wish we had your fluffy Mexicans.
"At least all of our lawns are mowed"
You are defending a slaver's cult that still practices slavery today.
Correction: Pedophile slaver warlord.
When you start the thread defending pedos, it's a bit too late to try to pretend to be sane later on.
Here's me rewriting your comment in a way that is sane.
This is obviously really bad, but we need to keep our eyes on the ball. The proposed 'misogyny' law would do immeasurable and permanent damage to everyone's rights in the UK, compared to which an underage girl being solicited is of comparatively minor significance. And I have noticed a pattern where such incidents are used to enact sweeping legislation that create wrongs far greater than the original wrong they were supposedly meant to address.
Due to the influence of feminist activists in both parties, the two party system has failed to actually represent ordinary people rather than activism. So it's up to us to show that we are not happy with the way things are going.
You may judge my comment based on my reputation, but that's not the case at all. If this law passes, all that's necessary for your freedom to be taken away is an unsubstantiated accusation that a woman makes.
Its amazing how when you strip away the schizobabble, there is that truth in the center.
The migrant rape gangs were ignored for the last decade and now it's finally getting mainstream attention... curiously coinciding with a push to pass some absurd and severe "anti-misogyny" laws...
The correct course of action would be to send all the migrants back to the 3rd world, but because it's Britain, they're trying to build bridges, not walls, so they build tiny walls on all their bridges to stop the van attacks. Likewise, criminalizing staring will not be enforced on migrants in no-go zones.
No wonder you side with your people, you seethe at White people not tolerating your 3rd world ways.
The Imp is white. And pls don't associate the rest of us with Islamic ways.
You are once again your own worst enemy.
You almost always have at least a sliver of a valid point. Often more than a sliver, and often extremely valid and important.
But you always overshadow it with your male genocide and Big Whamen insanity.