Why it’s important to speak up but while that’s easy to say people don’t want to lose jobs. I think things can be turned if we do the right things but it will be tough.
"The weight of this sad time we must obey.
Say what we think, not what we ought to say."
All kidding aside, I bet it's far less dangerous than people think it is. We hear the horror stories, not of all the people who say reasonable, rational thinks and don't get fired for it.
I can see that. Definitely a pick your battles situation. My company pushes DIE big time and they have voluntary discussions. I wonder if they could handle polite disagreements
Me being me, I wouldn't very polite (but I would definitely recommend that others be).
So some guy once said that "we want diversity because we want people with different life experiences".
I thought later on that I should have burst in with a question of: how do you know this 'diversity' automatically means different life experiences? Or: so... how many redheads are there, because they have had different life experiences like being bullied in school. Or: would that include people with bad body odor? They sure have different experiences?
If they ever bring up transgenderism, I'd point to my beard and ask if they would consider me female.
I've honest had it up to here with this nonsense, but the good thing is that we don't have that 'internalized racism' crap here (yet).
That hasn’t appears at my job as of yet. Hopefully it doesn’t but I have asked people to really consider the absurdity of assuming something is good simply because it is diverse
I've found that people who waver realize the issue when it's their hide on the line. So they don't care about 'university admissions' in the abstract, but hiring pilots for reasons of diversity, or surgeons.
No, no, it's supposed to hurt other people. Not me! DO IT TO JULIA!
And the crazy thing is that I have relatives who support affirmative action but get mad that there is a perception that a black person didn’t earn their promotion or is only a diversity hire. Or lowering standards on tests. I try to point out this is precisely why the perception exists. They don’t see the connection.
I think Sowell pushed back once on lefties who wanted to do away with background checks because they said it was racist. It actually made things worse.
Those were caused by Eurotrash putting their fingers on the scales. Had the Rhodies and Afrikaaners not been forced to stop the process, they would have cleaned house in short order, and SA in particular was well on the way to stability before the UN forced them to let black commies into government for... feels reasons, basically.
including the ones that believe state influence in economy leads to making said system less capitalistic.
I agree with libertarians very little, but this particular belief is obviously true, or at the very least the way the American regime influences the economy makes it less capitalistic. Airline bailouts, forcing citizens to buy healthcare products; many such cases. The government just paid billions in tax payers dollars to global mega corps and then tried to force us to take these "free" vaccines.
Now if we were talking about a theoretical government forcing an industry to stop making a harmful but highly profitable product then I would agree with that action (although it by definition would be making the system less capitalistic), but in almost all cases our actual government backs the harmful but highly profitable product up until the point where the harm can no longer be denied, which is worse than no interference at all.
You mean the system under which we live in? Yeah, I wonder why.
If you define "capitalism" as "the system under which we live" then ... well ... I'd suggest that your definition of "capitalism" is so overbroad that trying to discuss it with you would be fruitless.
I'd instead suggest that we just limit our discussion to "bogeymen" and in that case, I can agree with you that "bogeymen" are very bad indeed.
I really think this has the chance of being far worse than the 1940s in Germany were for Jewish people.
I say no, for several reasons:
Most of the people bashing white people the hardest are other white people, whose point is not to demonize white people, but to demonstrate that they are "one of the good ones".
Furthermore, white people won't be screwed. The elites don't care about skin color. They'll use it to advance their interests, but they don't care about it. They care about your obedience. If white people became slaves to the elites, they'd be as pro-white as it gets.
There is also a process that is already beginning: minorities will become less anti-white as time goes on (except blacks so far, but their anti-whiteness is continuously reinforced). Both because of assimilation, and because it will be increasingly difficult to portray whites as the source of their issues. In majority-non-white California, a proposition to allow racial discrimination was defeated by a majority of all ethnic groups and 1/3 of blacks, which is pretty good!
At least not on institutional level, on societal (inter-ethnic crime, harassment, abuse) for sure, probably way more.
Jews received fairly little of that from ordinary Germans, as much as the Nazi regime attempted to encourage it. Mostly they had to use their thugs to do it and then say that the "German nation, angry over X, rose up against the Jews".
That's because of asians, but racial discrimination is a lib meme to begin with.
Hispanics who theoretically benefit from it voted against it. That isn't "because of Asians". Same for 1/3 of blacks.
“Colorblindness” was an anti-white psyop designed to defang white peoples ahead of aggressive attacks on white peoples, cultures, and nations. Non-whites, collectively, never participated in the “colorblind” ceasefire.
Non-whites, collectively, never participated in the “colorblind” ceasefire.
People outside the West generally don't think in terms of color. A Japanese does not feel kinship with a Chinese just because they are both yellow, nor does an Arab Christian feel kinship with an Arab Muslim because they are both brown (though he might for reasons of nationalism).
Both thinking in terms of race and the opposing "colorblind" ideology are primarily Western creations (mostly in America) because the idea of an ethnic group or race requires interacting or mixing with some other races. When you get an influx of different types of people into your territory, it's natural to start drawing tribal lines based on the most obvious differences. Not going to happen but hypothetically if Asian countries started getting flooded with Africans you'd start to see the old national/ethnic walls break down and a rise in "Yellow Pride" movements in 100 years or so. (or maybe they'd be the new White by then)
im american of asian descent and i recognize once white people and christianity go bye bye in the usa.. its gonna be mad max bullshit with bulkanization. minorities killing and raping each other to be the main power. i also recognize asians are probably next on the chopping block once whites are "defeated". asians are the next successful demographics and all the other minorities will be jealous and come up with all sorts of excuses to mass murder us.
i just prefer to remain as the 1-2% minority that is just minding their own business and celebrate christmas and eat bbq ;s.
Organized minority beats a disorganized majority every time. Unfortunate way to learn the lesson but what can you do? I'm just trying to position myself opposite the mongrel hordes with as many dipshit leftists between as possible. The true believers will eat it the hardest.
I really think this has the chance of being far worse than the 1940s in Germany were for Jewish people.
This guy points out how white people in the US are going to be screwed when they are in the minority because these people are racist as fuck.
Why it’s important to speak up but while that’s easy to say people don’t want to lose jobs. I think things can be turned if we do the right things but it will be tough.
"The weight of this sad time we must obey.
Say what we think, not what we ought to say."
All kidding aside, I bet it's far less dangerous than people think it is. We hear the horror stories, not of all the people who say reasonable, rational thinks and don't get fired for it.
I can see that. Definitely a pick your battles situation. My company pushes DIE big time and they have voluntary discussions. I wonder if they could handle polite disagreements
Me being me, I wouldn't very polite (but I would definitely recommend that others be).
So some guy once said that "we want diversity because we want people with different life experiences".
I thought later on that I should have burst in with a question of: how do you know this 'diversity' automatically means different life experiences? Or: so... how many redheads are there, because they have had different life experiences like being bullied in school. Or: would that include people with bad body odor? They sure have different experiences?
If they ever bring up transgenderism, I'd point to my beard and ask if they would consider me female.
I've honest had it up to here with this nonsense, but the good thing is that we don't have that 'internalized racism' crap here (yet).
That hasn’t appears at my job as of yet. Hopefully it doesn’t but I have asked people to really consider the absurdity of assuming something is good simply because it is diverse
I've found that people who waver realize the issue when it's their hide on the line. So they don't care about 'university admissions' in the abstract, but hiring pilots for reasons of diversity, or surgeons.
No, no, it's supposed to hurt other people. Not me! DO IT TO JULIA!
And the crazy thing is that I have relatives who support affirmative action but get mad that there is a perception that a black person didn’t earn their promotion or is only a diversity hire. Or lowering standards on tests. I try to point out this is precisely why the perception exists. They don’t see the connection.
I think Sowell pushed back once on lefties who wanted to do away with background checks because they said it was racist. It actually made things worse.
I work for myself and say what I please
That’s good. My job definitely pushes the nonsense we see everywhere so I have to be careful. Congrats on having your own business
I don't think that's going to be the case.
Things will collapse long before white people become a small minority.
Then we'll end up with open tribal/ethnic warfare, just like what happens everywhere else in the world when social structures collapse.
Then white people will 'win' again, for the same reasons they've won every other time.
And I don't say any of that with any sort of glee or self-satisfaction. It's just what seems almost inevitable to me.
'Cause Rhodesia and South Africa were wins, right?
Those were caused by Eurotrash putting their fingers on the scales. Had the Rhodies and Afrikaaners not been forced to stop the process, they would have cleaned house in short order, and SA in particular was well on the way to stability before the UN forced them to let black commies into government for... feels reasons, basically.
And you think it'll be any different elsewhere?
If not Eurotrash with their fingers on the scales, then why not the WEF, or the Chinks?
I'd argue that the fighting never really started in those places because the combat was one-sided.
I don't see the US going down that way.
Yeah, and you blame everything on capitalism, so I'll take your opinions with a bucket of salt.
The regime interferes with the economy way too fucking much to call it capitalism.
I agree with libertarians very little, but this particular belief is obviously true, or at the very least the way the American regime influences the economy makes it less capitalistic. Airline bailouts, forcing citizens to buy healthcare products; many such cases. The government just paid billions in tax payers dollars to global mega corps and then tried to force us to take these "free" vaccines.
Now if we were talking about a theoretical government forcing an industry to stop making a harmful but highly profitable product then I would agree with that action (although it by definition would be making the system less capitalistic), but in almost all cases our actual government backs the harmful but highly profitable product up until the point where the harm can no longer be denied, which is worse than no interference at all.
If you define "capitalism" as "the system under which we live" then ... well ... I'd suggest that your definition of "capitalism" is so overbroad that trying to discuss it with you would be fruitless.
I'd instead suggest that we just limit our discussion to "bogeymen" and in that case, I can agree with you that "bogeymen" are very bad indeed.
I say no, for several reasons:
Most of the people bashing white people the hardest are other white people, whose point is not to demonize white people, but to demonstrate that they are "one of the good ones".
Furthermore, white people won't be screwed. The elites don't care about skin color. They'll use it to advance their interests, but they don't care about it. They care about your obedience. If white people became slaves to the elites, they'd be as pro-white as it gets.
There is also a process that is already beginning: minorities will become less anti-white as time goes on (except blacks so far, but their anti-whiteness is continuously reinforced). Both because of assimilation, and because it will be increasingly difficult to portray whites as the source of their issues. In majority-non-white California, a proposition to allow racial discrimination was defeated by a majority of all ethnic groups and 1/3 of blacks, which is pretty good!
Jews received fairly little of that from ordinary Germans, as much as the Nazi regime attempted to encourage it. Mostly they had to use their thugs to do it and then say that the "German nation, angry over X, rose up against the Jews".
Hispanics who theoretically benefit from it voted against it. That isn't "because of Asians". Same for 1/3 of blacks.
“Colorblindness” was an anti-white psyop designed to defang white peoples ahead of aggressive attacks on white peoples, cultures, and nations. Non-whites, collectively, never participated in the “colorblind” ceasefire.
People outside the West generally don't think in terms of color. A Japanese does not feel kinship with a Chinese just because they are both yellow, nor does an Arab Christian feel kinship with an Arab Muslim because they are both brown (though he might for reasons of nationalism).
Both thinking in terms of race and the opposing "colorblind" ideology are primarily Western creations (mostly in America) because the idea of an ethnic group or race requires interacting or mixing with some other races. When you get an influx of different types of people into your territory, it's natural to start drawing tribal lines based on the most obvious differences. Not going to happen but hypothetically if Asian countries started getting flooded with Africans you'd start to see the old national/ethnic walls break down and a rise in "Yellow Pride" movements in 100 years or so. (or maybe they'd be the new White by then)
Will watch it all later but it always feels good to see people talking about this.
Thanks. Started subscribing to him
Yellow...African...European?
im american of asian descent and i recognize once white people and christianity go bye bye in the usa.. its gonna be mad max bullshit with bulkanization. minorities killing and raping each other to be the main power. i also recognize asians are probably next on the chopping block once whites are "defeated". asians are the next successful demographics and all the other minorities will be jealous and come up with all sorts of excuses to mass murder us.
i just prefer to remain as the 1-2% minority that is just minding their own business and celebrate christmas and eat bbq ;s.
Organized minority beats a disorganized majority every time. Unfortunate way to learn the lesson but what can you do? I'm just trying to position myself opposite the mongrel hordes with as many dipshit leftists between as possible. The true believers will eat it the hardest.